September 27, 1996 – The deadliest of three known flu viruses circulating in the US in 1996 is the “Type-A Wuhan virus” (also see this and this). Nancy Arden of the Center for Disease Control’s National Center for Infectious Diseases said at the time, “A strain similar to Wuhan caused 38 percent of all cases of the flu in the United States last year. If the elderly or others who are chronically ill get the harsh Wuhan strain, they are more likely to get pneumonia or other life-threatening illnesses.” While this seems an awful lot like the current health threat facing the US, I find it funny how The NY Slimes and others called the flu strain the “Wuhan virus” when reporters often bickered with President Trump for pointing out where the COVID-19 pandemic originated from.
February 4, 1998 – Bill Gates is slammed in the face with a pie (for video click here) in Brussels, Belgium as he entered a government building to give a speech on education. It was at this exact moment Gates decided to kill or enslave every useless eater on the planet (I made the last part up, but for now let’s consider it a “known unknown”). Be sure to watch James Corbett’s excellent four-part series on Gates: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4. Backups: part 1, part 2, part 3, part 4.
April 25, 2004 – “The latest outbreak of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) in China, with eight confirmed or suspected cases so far and hundreds quarantined, involves two researchers who were working with the virus in a Beijing research lab… Antoine Danchin, an epidemiologist with the Hong Kong University Pasteur Research Center, who studied the SARS epidemic in Hong Kong, told The Scientist the latest incidents were probably the result of lab accidents.”
May 18, 2004 – The World Health Organization publishes an article about the safety concerns that exist at the Wuhan Institute of Virology in China. The article states, “During and after the SARS outbreak of 2003, a large number of specimens were collected from possible human cases, animals and the environment. These specimens, which may contain live SARS coronavirus, are still kept in various laboratories around the world. Some of them are stored in laboratories at an inappropriate containment level. SARS coronavirus has also been propagated in reference and research laboratories, and distributed to other laboratories for research purposes. Research using live and inactivated SARS coronavirus – and other pathogens capable of causing serious illness – is being conducted in many laboratories.” The article ends on a positive note, however, praising “Chinese authorities for taking swift action to contain the latest outbreak once it was recognized and reported, by way of extensive contact tracing and the quarantine…” I hope you can sense my sarcasm, because there will plenty more moving forward.
March 1, 2005 – The New York Slimes prints an article describing how 758 scientists sent a letter of protest to the National Institute of Health because grants dedicated to studying bioweapons – valued in the hundreds of millions of dollars – had seen a fifteen fold increase since 2001, while grants dedicated to the study of “regular” diseases that regularly impact a large portion of the entire population had been steadily decreasing.
April 29, 2005 – The Center for Global Development releases a 129-page book titled, “Making Markets for Vaccines: Ideas to action.”
August 22, 2005 – A study is published online titled, “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” The study’s conclusion states in part, “Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection.” Fast forward to 2020 and the media and the left (but I repeat myself) would rather have people suffer and die than use a drug touted by President Trump.
May 2010 – The Rockefeller Foundation, along with the Global Business Network, releases a planning report titled “Scenarios for the Future of Technology and International Development.” Included in the document are several “scenarios” that describe “four very different futures.” These scenarios are “designed to be both plausible and provocative, to engage your imagination while also raising new questions for you about what that future might look and feel like. Each scenario tells a story of how the world, and in particular the developing world, might progress over the next 15 to 20 years, with an emphasis on those elements relating to the use of different technologies and the interaction of these technologies with the lives of the poor and vulnerable.” One of these scenarios is titled “Lock Step” and it’s based on “A world of tighter top-down government control and more authoritarian leadership, with limited innovation and growing citizen pushback” following a pandemic… Click here to read my full breakdown of the Lock Step scenario.
November 23, 2011 – Science.org publishes an article titled “Scientists Brace for Media Storm Around Controversial Flu Studies.” The piece begins with, “Locked up in the bowels of the medical faculty building here and accessible to only a handful of scientists lies a man-made flu virus that could change world history if it were ever set free.” The article isn’t too lengthy and worth taking the time to read. It was around this time that a still-ongoing debate sparked within the scientific community about the risks and usefulness of “dual-use research of concern” (DURC) and the overarching ethical considerations the practice presented (for some examples see this, this, this, this, this, this, this and this). Far too many people maintain the default position that all scientific research and experimentation is ethical and necessary, but unfortunately it is not. Moreover, there are many scientific endeavors occurring on a regular basis that most people – if they were aware of them – would consider too risky to engage in and therefore should be avoided.
I’ve also noticed that since COVID began circulating around the globe, some of the “scientific” publications out there began including the following editor’s note (or something similar) at the top or bottom of articles which detailed the dangers and concerns about these man-made viruses escaping from labs: “Editors’ note, March 2020: We are aware that this story is being used as the basis for unverified theories that the novel coronavirus causing COVID-19 was engineered. There is no evidence that this is true; scientists believe [emphasis mine] that an animal is the most likely [emphasis mine] source of the coronavirus.” This is a lie. There’s plenty of evidence.
May 27, 2014 – The National Institute of Allergies and Infectious Diseases, which Dr. Anthony Fauci has been in charge of since the mid-80s, begins sending money (also see this) to the Wuhan Institute of Virology for “gain of function” research through an organization called EcoHealth Alliance.
August 18, 2014 – “China and France are jointly constructing a top-level biosafety lab in Wuhan, Hubei province, which will facilitate scientific research into dangerous viruses such as Ebola.” While the lab was inaugurated on January, 31 2015, it did not become operational until 2017 because of delays connected to suspicions about the Chinese military getting involved in the architecture and design process.
October 17, 2014 – The US government puts a “pause” on funding dangerous “gain-of-function” research. The Scientist reported at the time, “The White House Office of Science and Technology Policy (OSTP) and Department of Health and Human Services last week announced it was launching a detailed review into so-called gain-of-function research, in which pathogens are manipulated to alter their capabilities.” This decision may have halted funding for the collaborative efforts of Dr. Ralph Baric (University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill) and Dr. Shi Zhengli (Wuhan Institute of Virology) who were conducting this type of research at the time of the “pause.”
November 3, 2014 – A now-deleted article is published on the Horn of Africa website titled “US Cannot save Ethiopia from Tigray-Peoples-Liberation-Front.” The article contains an image of former President Obama sitting alongside Susan Rice, John Kerry, Samantha Power and others, at a table with then Ethiopian Prime Minister Hailemariam Desalegn Boshe, then Ethiopian Defense Minister Siraj Fegessa, then Ethiopian Minister of Foreign Affairs Workneh Gebeyehu Negewo, and Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus. Aside from the regime in Ethiopia being a bunch of terrorists, the article itself is pretty innocuous – which begs the question: why was it taken down? Perhaps it’s because Dr. Tedros would become head of the WHO three short years later and terrorism and health are two things that have never been compatible in any way.
November 9, 2015 – A study is published online about the “threat of cross-species transmission events leading to outbreaks in humans” in regard to coronaviruses originating in bats. In the main section of the report they write about how they are creating chimeras: “Therefore, to examine the emergence potential (that is, the potential to infect humans) of circulating bat CoVs, we built a chimeric virus encoding a novel, zoonotic CoV spike protein – from the RsSHC014-CoV sequence that was isolated from Chinese horseshoe bats – in the context of the SARS-CoV mouse-adapted backbone. The hybrid virus allowed us to evaluate the ability of the novel spike protein to cause disease independently of other necessary adaptive mutations in its natural backbone.” The study isn’t too long and worth the read. Dr. Shi Zhengli and Ralph Baric both contributed. I mentioned in an earlier entry that funding for the collaborative efforts of these two doctors may have been halted more than a year earlier, but there is no submission date attached to this study, and it could have preceded the funding halt. For general information on viruses see this and this.
October 28, 2016 – A series of NIH-Moderna Confidential Agreements begin arranging for the transfer of proprietary information between Moderna and NIH. The info being exchanged includes “NIAID’s proprietary information and data related to the development of vaccines for HIV, influenza, Ebola and MERS and development of broadly neutralizing monoclonal antibodies for preventative and therapeutic use” and “Moderna’s proprietary and confidential information related to design and manufacture of a messenger RNA platform and messenger RNA constructs for treatment and prevention of disease.” It’s probably just a coincidence that just as these technologies were developed to the point they were getting ready to be deployed for profit we see a virus leak from a Chinese lab that is being funded by one of the very entities signing on to these agreements – of which there are many. Also see this.
November 10, 2016 – Forbes publishes an article (backup here) by Ida Auken titled “Welcome To 2030: I Own Nothing, I Have No Privacy, And Life Has Never Been Better.” According to the bio provided at the World Economic Forum website, Auken “is the Former Minister for the Environment in Denmark… She is member of the Danish Parliament for The Social Liberal Party and is Chairman for The Parliament’s Climate and Energy Committee. Ida Auken was the first Danish politician chosen to be a Young Global Leader for the World Economic Forum and has also been elected to be one out of the 40 most promising young leaders under 40 in Europe.” The article is a dystopian, futuristic propaganda piece aimed at selling poverty and slavery as the only solution to the supposed climate crisis. In the future, Auken writes, people don’t own anything – not even clothes – because possessions have become services. People do not need any money or possessions because everything is free and can be accessed upon demand. There is no rent because “someone else is using our free space whenever we do not need it” (her room is apparently used for business meetings when she’s not there). In this fictional (and delusional) world, artificial intelligence (AI) and robots are doing so much of the work that people have time “to eat well, sleep well and spend time with other people” – you know, because that’s unheard of now. And while all this sounds great, there is of course a downside… for some people anyway. Auken’s biggest concern is “all the people who do not live in our city. Those we lost on the way. Those who decided that it became too much, all this technology. Those who felt obsolete and useless when robots and AI took over big parts of our jobs. Those who got upset with the political system and turned against it. They live different kind of lives outside of the city. Some have formed little self-supplying communities. Others just stayed in the empty and abandoned houses in small 19th century villages.” What she is really saying is that those who do not want to live in a dystopia will be kicked to the curb and left to fend for themselves until they eventually die off. Auken also says that in the future everything people think and dream about will be recorded and that she “hopes” nobody will use this information against her. The article, while not very long, has a creepy factor that is off the charts. This is the type of worldwide socialism garbage pushed by elites like those at the World Economic Forum and the Forum for the Future. In the future they envision, the world population will be culled by 90%. Those who remain will be divided into two groups: the elite and everyone else. While Auken paints a picture meant to make this world seem appealing, the more realistic conclusion is that this will be a life of hardship and misery for those who do not submit. Just look at how many people in the US – and around the world – are suffering today.
January 10, 2017 – Dr. Anthony Fauci predicts the Trump administration will be faced with a “surprise outbreak” during a keynote address at Georgetown University. For the full speech click here. Fauci has now advised and served in six presidential administrations as the head of the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases since his appointment in 1984. Fauci is a Bill Gates stooge (also see this and this) and part of what we now commonly refer to as the “deep state.”
February 22, 2017 – It is reported the level 4 lab in Wuhan, China that began construction with the help of the French government in 2014 and was later inaugurated in 2015, is getting set to go operational with level 4 activities. At this point, only other parts of the lab complex were operational. Take note of the editor’s note at the end.
September 20, 2017 – Founder and Executive Chairman of the World Economic Forum, Klaus Schwab, speaks at the Harvard Kennedy School Institute of Politics. During a forum called “Strengthening Collaboration in a Fractured World,” Schwab brags about controlling various governments around the world (backup link here) through the WEF’s Young Global Leaders program saying, “And I have to say, when I mention our names, like Mrs. Merkel, even Vladimir Putin and so on, they all have been young global leaders of the World Economic Forum. But what we are very proud of now is the young generation like Prime Minister Trudeau, president of elsewhere, Argentina and so on… So we penetrate the cabinets. So yesterday, I was at a reception for Prime Minister Justin Trudeau and I would know that half of this cabinet or even more than half of this cabinet are from our actually young global leaders of the world… It’s true in Argentina, and it’s true in France now, I mean Mr. President who is a young global leader…” In retrospect, it’s no coincidence that the world leaders who were the most tyrannical during the pandemic came out of this program. Jacinda Ardern would be a good example. So yes, there’s actually a school where these people are indoctrinated into globalist thinking so that when a global crisis is manufactured, they can act in lockstep with one another as they work to usher in global governance. The full event can be seen here (Schwab’s previously-mentioned comments begin around the 1:08:15 mark). Update (2/19/22): During a Canadian session of parliament, conservative MP Colin Carrie asks about Klaus Schwab and the WEF’s undue influence over Canadian politics, specifically asking for the names of the Cabinet members that have “penetrated” the body on behalf of the WEF. Before any answer can be given, the speaker pretends the audio and video were “really really bad” – when they clearly were not – and simply ignores the question. Carrie is then followed by MP Charlie Angus who accuses Carrie of “promoting open disinformation.” As you can see from this entry, Schwab is clearly on record saying these things. So is it safe to assume that Angus is on the WEF payroll?
October 2017 – The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security publishes a “Futuristic Scenario for Public Health Risk Communicators” called “The SPARS Pandemic: 2025 – 2028.” The 89-page document is broken into 19 chapters that go through every aspect of what a pandemic response would look like after an outbreak of a fictional illness known as the St. Paul Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SPARS). The illness is a coronavirus. The document also uses fictional “medical countermeasures, characters, news media excerpts, social media posts, and government agency responses” to “illustrate the public health risk communication challenges that could potentially emerge during a naturally occurring infectious disease outbreak requiring development and distribution of novel and/or investigational drugs, vaccines, therapeutics, or other medical countermeasures.” As you will see, the similarities between this fictional scenario and the COVID pandemic are eerie to say the least. This document is basically a playbook that political leaders throughout the western world closely followed once the COVID pandemic kicked off. Click here to read my chapter-by-chapter breakdown of the SPARS report.
December 19, 2017 – The National Institutes of Health announces they will resume funding “gain-of-function” research, which was likely already being funded in China.
January 25, 2018 – During the World Economic Forum’s annual summit in Davos, Switzerland, a panel discussion is held titled “Transforming Health in the Fourth Industrial Revolution.” Participating in the discussion is Albert Bourla (Chief Operating Officer of Pfizer), Satya Nadella (Chief Executive Officer of Microsoft), Michael F. Neidorff (Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Centene), and Rajeev Suri (President and Chief Executive Officer of Nokia). The event is moderated by Rebecca Blumenstein, the Deputy Managing Editor of the New York Slimes. At the 45:20 mark of the linked video, the panel is asked a question by Hooman Hakami, head of the diabetics division for Medtronic. Hakami asks about “patient engagement” and expresses concern that no matter how great the new drugs or advancements Big Pharma creates are, there’s no guarantee that a patient will “take the drug or wear the device,” and so he asks, “How are you thinking about technology to engage the patient?” Albert Bourla jumps in and responds by saying, “Again, maybe I will use an example. I think it’s fascinating what is happening in this field right now. I mean FDA approved the first ‘electronic pill,’ if I can call it like that. So it is basically a biological chip that is in the tablet and, once you take the tablet, and it dissolves into your stomach, it sends a signal that you took the tablet. So imagine the applications of that, the compliance. The insurance companies to know that the medicines that patients should take, they do take them. It is fascinating what happens in this field. But of course there will be an initial cost, and someone needs to invest.” Unfortunately, it’s not a stretch to imagine a scenario where my ability to get the things that I need depends entirely on my level of “compliance.” If millions, or even billions, of people are forced to comply with what their government or a pharmaceutical company thinks is best, this could have a disastrous impact on the concept of what it actually means to be free (and healthy).
April 4-6, 2018 – A flu symposium is held at the William and Ida Friday Center located in Chapel Hill, NC to mark the 100 year anniversary of one of the deadliest pandemics in human history. One of the presenters at the symposium is Ralph Baric of UNC Chapel Hill (see above). The title on the slide he uses to start his presentation reads: “How Bad Could the Next Pandemic Be, What Might it Look Like, and Will We Be Ready.” To start, Baric makes with the cheesy jokes, saying that he fears being known as “an arbiter of doom” and assures everyone that he’s not one of the four horsemen of the apocalypse, but instead “really kind of a nice guy.” Baric goes on to list all previous pandemics before stating that coronaviruses currently represent the biggest threat to the world, summing it up with “If you don’t believe me ask Bill Gates. He clearly thinks 10M people could easily be killed in the next decade or so from infectious diseases.” That’s right, the actual scientist is recommending you go ask the nerdy, non-scientist billionaire about the next pandemic. Let that sink in. He then goes on to discuss the work he’s been doing with Shi Zhengli, namely the creation of chimeric viruses, or Frankenviruses which are composed of different features from different viruses, and which have no cure. At the 32:00 mark Baric says that the next pandemic will lead to shortages and doctors having to decide “who gets care, who lives and who dies” before shifting the lecture to “Market Indicators” because he wants to give you “some good news eventually.” At the 33:30 mark he begins giving advice to the audience should they want to “be prepared and make money in the next pandemic.” Baric says they should buy stock in companies that make hazmat suits or PPE, as well as drug companies that will produce the particular types of drugs needed to treat people saying, “you’ll probably do pretty well.” He then puts up a slide titled “Pandemics: Opportunity” to explain how pandemics offer people the opportunity for political gain, financial gain and personal gain “during times of social upheaval.” During his closing remarks he of course makes references to “conspiracy theories” like I’m sure any mad scientist would do while engaging in dangerous and unnecessary research. The lecture is good overall if you want to learn about the history of pandemics, what the “experts” believe are the biggest threats to humanity, and what crazy people do while at work. A backup link to the presentation can be found here.
September 21, 2018 – Microsoft applies for a patent with the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) for a “cryptocurrency system using body activity data.” The patent was published 3/26/2020. Also see this and this.
January 16, 2019 – Bill Gates writes an article published in the Wall Street Journal titled, “The Best Investment I Ever Made.” The investment he is writing about is the $10B he invested “to help provide vaccines, drugs, bed nets and other supplies in developing countries…” which, by his estimation has “created an estimated $200 billion in social and economic benefits.” And in case you were wondering, he is only doing this because he loves us. Gates writes, “What if we had invested $10 billion in energy projects in the developing world? In that case, the return would have been $150 billion. What about infrastructure? $170 billion. By investing in global health institutions, however, we exceeded all of those returns…” This guy deploys some of the slickest propaganda out there, whether penned by him, or the media he funds. Make no mistake, Gates profits from these investments every step of the way. He uses the money in his “foundation” – which is protected from tax liability – to fund various causes the Bill and Melinda Gates Fund has invested heavily in. The Gates know exactly what they’re doing.
June 20, 2019 – Microsoft applies for another patent with the WIPO for a “cryptocurrency system using body activity data.” The patent was published 3/26/2020. The publication number for this patent is WO/2020/060606... You just can’t make this shit up.
July 5, 2019 – Virologist Xiangguo Qiu, her husband Keding Cheng, and a number of her international students lost security clearance to Canada’s National Microbiology Laboratory’s Vaccine Development and Antiviral Therapies section in the Special Pathogens Program after suspicions arose that these doctors may have been illegally transferring intellectual property back to the Chinese government, and that the Chinese government is using this property towards the development of biological weapons.
September 20, 2019 – The ID2020 Alliance and GAVI partner with the government of Bangladesh and other developing countries to establish a digital biometric identity database to track vaccination records. The city of Austin, Texas has also begun “empowering” their homeless population through a program called MyPass by giving them “identity data.” These types of programs are being sold as a way for even the poorest individuals to have financial inclusion, but it doesn’t take a rocket scientist to figure out that they can also be used for financial exclusion for those individuals that don’t adhere to government demands.
October 10, 2019 – A study is published online examining the connection between seasonal flu vaccines and respiratory “virus interference.” The study, which was conducted among a large number of Department of Defense personnel, revealed that “Vaccine derived virus interference was significantly associated with coronavirus…” In other words, taking a seasonal flu vaccine makes people more susceptible to respiratory illnesses like the Wuhan Red Death.
October 18, 2019 – “Event 201” gets underway in New York City with the head of the Chinese CDC present for the exercise. Here is a breakdown of the other “players” who participated, including links to learn about who they are (a pack of globalists). From the official Event 201 website homepage: “The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security in partnership with the World Economic Forum and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation hosted Event 201, a high-level pandemic exercise on October 18, 2019, in New York, NY. The exercise illustrated areas where public/private partnerships will be necessary during the response to a severe pandemic in order to diminish large-scale economic and societal consequences.” From the official “Event 201 Scenario” page: “Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.” Just like COVID.
November 27, 2019 – The New England Journal of Medicine publishes a study titled, “A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics.” The study tested four separate treatments for Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and of the 673 patients who participated, 175 received remdesivir. The section titled “Mortality” reads in part, “On August 9, 2019, when 681 patients had been enrolled, the data and safety monitoring board conducted an interim analysis on data from 499 patients and, on the basis of two observations, recommended terminating random assignment to ZMapp and remdesivir.” This is because 53% of the people given remdesivir died during the trial and continued use of the drug could not be justified. The study went on to say while “most characteristics at baseline were balanced across the four groups, values for serum creatinine and aminotransferases were higher in the ZMapp and remdesivir groups than in the MAb114 and REGN-EB3 groups,” which indicates the drugs were damaging to both the liver and kidneys. Despite the fact remdesivir is total garbage, it later became a key part of the NIH’s COVID treatment “protocol.”
December 9, 2019 – Peter Daszak, president of EcoHealth Alliance, is a guest on the This Week in Virology podcast where he makes several revealing statements. When asked about how “diverse coronaviruses” could be dealt with since there are no reliably effective therapeutics or vaccines, Daszak responds (29:45), “Coronaviruses are pretty good – I mean you’re a virologist, you know all this stuff – but they, you can manipulate them in the lab pretty easily. Spike protein drives a lot of what happens with the coronavirus, zoonotic risk. So you can get the sequence, you can build the protein, and we work with Ralph Baric down at UNC to do this, and insert in the backbone of another virus and do some work in the lab. So you can get more predictive when you can find the sequence. You got this diversity. Now the logical progression for vaccines is if you’re gonna develop a vaccine for SARS – ya know, people are gonna use pandemic SARS as the [inaudible], but let’s try to insert some of these other related and get a better vaccine.” It’s very likely that COVID was created through gain-of-function experiments aimed at creating a “pan-viral” vaccine that could guard against all coronaviruses – which could also explain why they were creating new ones.
December 12, 2019 – An NIH-Moderna Confidential Agreement is signed arranging for the transfer of “mRNA coronavirus vaccines candidates developed and jointly owned by NIAID and Moderna” (pages 105-109). The samples were sent to the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill – to be received by Dr. Ralph Baric. Previous experience with other coronaviruses like MERS already had research headed in the direction of mRNA gene therapies – for some time – with candidates ready to be fast tracked to market. Also see this.