Reading 3,234 pages of Dr. Fauci’s emails was an interesting adventure to say the least. They contain a troubling amount of redactions, indications there was a coordinated effort to suppress effective treatments for COVID, proof of a coordinated effort to cover up the “lab leak theory,” a few admissions that masks are ineffective and plenty of undeserved praise from perfect strangers. I did my best to get them down to about 50 readable pages.
Page 2 – On March 5, 2020, NIH Medical Director Angie Muniz sends Fauci an email about her concerns regarding the national blood supply. Muniz wrote in part, “I am sorry to bother but I wanted to notify the Coronavirus Task force [sic] about potential blood shortages if blood centers get blood drive cancellations due to the fear in the public. We are starting to see this locally and my concern is that other blood centers in the country are facing the same issue.” Muniz is pointing out one of the unintended consequences of the COVID fear mongering.
Pages 5 and 6 – On March 4, 2020, Andre Kalil sends Fauci and others a heavily redacted email about Remdesivir. The subject line reads “New concerns for our randomized trial.” There are many other messages pertaining to Remdesivir throughout the 3,200+ emails.
Pages 9 and 10 – On March 4, 2020, The Twerp receives an email from what appears to be a random person named Aliantha Angel. Angel is inquiring about whether or not taking a pneumonia vaccine would help if one were to later contract COVID. Fauci says it won’t, but recommends they take the shot if they’re over 65 years of age.
Page 14 – On March 4, 2020, Dr. Fauci receives an email from someone named Rich Silverman who is asking about whether or not it would be a good idea to get a pneumonia vaccine into more of the general population to help mitigate symptoms should they later catch the coronavirus. Before making his suggestion, Rich decides to suck up a little bit, writing, “I apologize in advance for this email. I am sure you are too busy these days to answer coronavirus questions from the general public. However, you are the only individual I know of who can be trusted to speak intelligently about the pandemic. I know there is no preventive vaccine or cure, and there probably won’t be for quite some time – despite what our ersatz President says.” Bad take, Rich. Fauci is the biggest liar going, and if you trust him you probably lack discernment. Had he been honest about early treatment at the start of the pandemic, countless lives around the world could have been saved.
Page 23 – On March 3, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Ezekiel Emanuel that opens with, “Hope they are greatng [sic] you better about media appearances after my call with trump.” This is thug behavior.
Page 24 – On March 4, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a 30-year-nurse named Patti Taylor. She makes what I think is a suggestion (her idea/suggestion is redacted as well as the email’s subject line) before noting, “Anyway I was thinking of the Coronavirus and maybe it has something like an autoimmune part to it that makes a person unable to fight back…” I believe the medical term Patti’s looking for is kawinkidink.
Page 37 – On March 3, 2020, Fauci receives an interesting email from a man named Bob Isman expressing his concern over undue fear in the general public. The subject line reads, “How to put COVID-19 statistics in perspective.” In the email Isman writes, “…CNN featured a discussion with NY Gov. Cuomo regarding a new COVID-19 case in NY City. He happened to note that there are currently about 15,000 patients in NY hospitals with the flu. Although multiple government agencies, scientists and health experts keep reminding us that there are far more cases, hospitalizations and deaths each year from influenza than this coronavirus, it strikes me that a more effective, more visual and less fear-producing way of presenting this information would be to present the current number of cases, hospitalizations and deaths from EACH of these diseases side by side. If the number of flu cases, hospitalizations and/or deaths isn’t available on a daily basis, we could use extrapolations based on known rates. I think this would certainly go a long way to putting the relative risks of these diseases in clearer focus.” Little did Isman or anyone else know that through a coordinated effort by the WHO, the CDC, politicians and the media, all of the deaths from flu and pneumonia (and shootings and car accidents and just about anything else) would be counted as COVID deaths to artificially inflate the pandemic’s overall death toll and promote fear in society. Making people afraid was key, and it is what drove many to go along with everything – the masks, the lockdowns, the mindless hatred far too people have for President Trump… Fauci the Fear Monger pretty much blew the guy off writing back, “Thank you for your note.”
Page 49 – On March 3, 2020, a doctor named Arthur Bobrove suggested to Fauci that perhaps “delivering by inhalation, low concentrations of a Zinc salt” could help the elderly if used as a prophylaxis and wondered if there was any known information available on the subject. Fauci forwards the message to NIH Public Inquiries.
Page 54 – On March 2, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a Canadian pharmacist by the name of Rob Klein. Klein suggests that perhaps the reason why children are hardly affected by COVID is because of cross-protection from one of the childhood vaccines they received. He then suggests the NIH begin to look at this so they can determine which vaccine is offering this perceived protection from COVID, and booster shots can be given to adults. Despite this actually being a very interesting suggestion, Fauci forwards the email to Cristina Cassetti – who seems to be the go-to person when it comes to shooting down ideas on prevention and therapeutics whenever they are offered. To Fauci and the rest of the pandemic opportunists (best case)/plotters (worst case), only a novel mRNA gene therapy drug would be able to protect the public from the novel disease they created.
Page 64 – On March 2, 2020, Fauci receives an email from another sycophantic dope by the name of Richard Johnson M.D. His email reads, “You were the star of the broadcast today! Your intelligence, confidence, warmth, and humor are what we all need with COVID-19. Please keep these coming. You appear to have a great working relationship with Dr. Burks.” You mean Dr. Birx? Get your head out of your ass, Dick.
Pages 65 through 69 – On March 2, 2020, Fauci gets into a back and forth with Washington Compost “reporter” and CFR flunky Michael Gerson. In the original email Gerson makes general inquiries about the virus, its spread, and how bad the situation is going to get so he can prepare for a hit piece he is going to write. As you would also expect from a leftist minion, Gerson casually makes a partisan comment – “This is partly a political problem (in my view).” After Fauci makes with the info Gerson sends him a draft of the article to which Fauci offers “edits in red for accuracy.” Here are the first 5 sentences of the fear mongering garbage put together by the partisan Compost reporter: “America is entering a disturbing new stage in the coronavirus outbreak. There has been community spread in at least one and likely two locations in Washington State. And it appears the virus was being transmitted for at least a few weeks before current cases were recognized. So we can expect dozens or hundreds of cases in those locations unless contact tracing is especially efficient. That means the disease is loose and easily transmitted.” The disease is loose! It’s loose! Hide in your homes!… Gimme a break, Mike. The trash piece goes on to say there are no cures, no treatments, and that it’s going to be about a year before a vaccine is ready “assuming there are no unpredicted scientific obstacles in the way.” No wonder why MSM readers are brain-damaged. This email exchange marks the beginning of the media’s marching orders to start pushing social distancing, which even Gerson admits is “much harder to do in a free society.” Though I have to question how free we really are – and how much people truly value their freedom – considering the way so many people went along with every last ridiculous government edict… like wearing two masks! There is also an interesting redaction on page 66 in an email from Fauci to Gerson I’d really love to see, and Fauci inaccurately predicting COVID’s mortality rate on page 67.
Page 70 – On March 2, 2020, Wall Street Journal health “reporter” Sumathi Reddy inquires about the mortality rate of COVID to which Fauci responds 2%. This number is inaccurate and therefore extremely misleading. From the beginning, COVID’s mortality rate has been far less than 2% for most age groups. Only among the elderly and people with multiple comorbidities is COVID a real threat – which is why ghoulish leftist blue state governors sending infected patients into nursing homes was such a disaster.
Pages 72 through 74 – On March 2, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Mark Shlomchik, Chair of the Department of Immunology at University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, asking if a fake news article from Business Insider is true. The article claims (claim was originally made in the NY Slimes) the Trump administration is “muzzling” Fauci. Fauci responds by simply stating, “The story is not true. I am not being muzzled or censored.” Shlomchik – who seems terribly disappointed the story is not true – then tells Fauci if it isn’t true he should say so publicly before including some fake news excerpts, and concluding his email by writing, “We cannot mince words about this or have nuances. If you were told not to appear on Sunday talk shows, then a reasonable person would have to assume your speech indeed is being controlled. Whether you call it “muzzled” or censored is a matter of semantics. Is it factual that you were told/asked not to appear on these shows as had been scheduled?” Fauci writes him back later that night and seems a little miffed by the fact that denying this once was not enough and responds, “I have been very explicit in stating publicly that I am not being muzzled or censored. I say exactly what I want to say based on scientific evidence, I have stated this on multiple TV programs over the past few days including at a major press conference with many, many reporters present including several TV cameras. I could not possibly be more public about this. No censor. No muzzle. Free to speak out.” What is so amazing about accomplished people like Shlomchik is that even though they’re seemingly very smart, they seem content to rely on completely biased, fake news outlets like XiNN, The NY Slimes, Business Insider, The Washington Compost and MSDNC for seemingly all of their “news.”
Page 82 – On March 1, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a doctor named Alexander Morden with an article attached he wrote on the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat coronavirus or as a prophylaxis. The attachment says, “Urgent Proposal to Mitigate Spread Fauci.pdf, HCQ, A Modest Proposal for Mitigating COVID-19 2.0.pdf.” Fauci forwards the email to Cristina Cassetti and tells her to do what she feels is appropriate. I wonder how many other doctors out there know HCQ and ivermectin were (and still are) being actively suppressed.
Page 94 – On March 1, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a misguided leftist dope named JP Hanke. Hanke is writing to suggest the CDC create a bunch of short videos about how to travel safely, properly wash one’s hands, when to wear a mask, etc. – “provided that Mike Pence doesn’t try to turn them into campaign ads for Donald Trump” of course. Fauci tacitly approves of the asinine comment by thanking him for the note and informing Hanke it’s already being done. It’s wild reading emails by so many self-important jackasses who make suggestions that just aren’t very creative. That said, I have a suggestion for Mr. JP Hanke… go play in traffic, buddy.
Pages 102 and 103 – On March 1, 2020, Fauci receives an email from another self-important jackass, this one named Thomas Murray. Murray, who describes himself as a former newspaper editor from the 70s, actually offers to start a “campaign” (along with his elected representatives) to expose the Trump administration’s supposed “muzzling” of Fauci. The Twerp responds by saying, “Thanks for the note. Please stay silent since I have not been muzzled. I will be on multiple TV shows tomorrow and was on FOX this AM. No one is censoring me.” Put the cape back in the closet, Tom.
Page 104 – On March 1, 2020, Fauci receives an email from the very official sounding D.A. Sonneborn Ph.D. Sonneborn is writing to ask Fauci “if you still believe Americans can trust CDC’s public-facing authority or whether we’d best look to WHO for reliable information about the virus, the disease and any new mutations which might arise. Mike Pence does not have appropriate credentials.” Like more than a few of my college professors, Sonneborn seems like just another Ph.D. who has no clue about how things work. Pence was head of the coronavirus task force to allocate resources and deploy PPE and testing kits to where they were needed. It was more about logistics for Pence while The Twerp and The Scarf Lady, among others, were in charge of deciding on the best ways to mitigate spread and speak on potential treatments. It reminds me of how Casting Couch Kamala and China Joe repeatedly said during their 2020 campaign that if Donald Trump told them to take the vaccine – his vaccine apparently – they wouldn’t trust it. “Only if the doctors say it’s safe” they said, as if Trump was in the White House basement with his lab coat and goggles and test tubes concocting vaccines without a background in medicine. Though Fauci responded “You can trust CDC” it’s clear from everything included in this timeline that neither the WHO nor the CDC are trustworthy.
Pages 113 and 114 – On March 1, 2020, Fauci is contacted by yet another clueless Ph.D., this one a psychologist/psychoanalyst by the name of Lawrence Brown. Brown is writing to get clarity about the fake White House muzzling Fauci story, and of course, to insult the President of the United States. His email reads in part, “I know I’m not alone in being appalled and frightened by President Trump wanting you to issue information about the current crises only after it has been cleared by his administration. In his office as President, Donald Trump may be de facto, Commander-in Chief. There is nothing about his office that confers Expert-in-Chief on him, and what he chooses to say or not say about Covid-19 and its spread should not be treated by the media or anyone as information that is trustworthy for being factual and scientifically-based information to the highest degree that it is possible to obtain. I hope that you will find it in yourself and in the mission of your office to publicly assure the American public in no uncertain terms that you will not be censored, and that you will honor the public’s trust to continue to provide real, research-based information about the frightening health nightmare…” While this is fancily written, it’s only one level above the “Not My President” mantra repeated by blue-haired Antifa-types currently infesting leftist-run American cities. Fauci responds to Brown by writing, “I can assure you that I am not being censored.” It’s a big problem when even highly educated people can get sucked into the world of politically-driven fake news. It’s an even bigger problem when a dirty lying rat like Fauci is seen as the arbiter of truth when he funded the very research that brought the world the “frightening health nightmare” we’ve all been forced to deal with.
Pages 117 and 118 – On February 27, 2020, Fauci receives an email from National Panhandler Radio “reporter” HJ Mai seeking to confirm whether the fake news story put out by the NY Slimes claiming Fauci was being censored by the Trump White House is true. Mai writes, “I was wondering if you could confirm a NYT report that says the White House has instructed you not to say anything about the coronavirus outbreak without prior approval.” Fauci responds by writing, “This is really not true. It was taken very much out of context.” Fauci’s “taken very much out of context” comment can easily be taken out of context as it’s very misleading. You’re either being censored or you’re not being censored. Why did Fauci not just clearly tell Mai he was not being censored like he did in the other emails?
Pages 121 and 122 – On March 1, 2020, Fauci receives an email from “syndicated political columnist” Bob Franken. Franken requests to speak to Fauci about the fake NY Slimes story claiming he is being censored. Fauci declines to speak with him but provides some useful background information about how the process works when he speaks to the press. The Twerp writes, “I have never been given orders to get approval from the VP’s people to speak publicly about coronavirus. Ever since I have been doing this since the Reagan administration, whenever a member of the Executive Branch such as me gets invited and goes on National TV such as the Sunday Talk shows, there is always a routine process of clearing it with your department (in this case HHS) who then clears it with the White House. This is routine and has been true for the Reagan, Bush ’41, Clinton, Bush ’43, Obama, and now the Trump administration. It is merely a formality so that they know what is coming out from the executive branch. I have always gotten clearance with very few exceptions over the past 35 years (usually because they do not want you on TV at the same time that the President is making an important announcement). I have never been muzzled or told that I could not speak out publicly about anything during this administration.” It’s amazing how many times Fauci had to refute this story. I guess these clowns missed every time Fauci denied the claim publicly?
Page 126 – On February 26, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Robert Geller inquiring about what type of mask he should be wearing, how COVID transmits and if there is “anything new on vaccine or treatment.” Fauci responds on March 1st and writes, “…Use an N95 if you have them available. Transmission is similar to influenza: respiratory droplets and likely a bit more as aerosol than with influenza. People can transmit even when they are asymptomatic. No approved therapies; however, we are doing clinical trials on ‘re-purposed’ [sic] drugs such as remdesivir (Gilead), Vaccine going into phase 1 trial in about 6 weeks, but will not be ready for at least 1.5 years.” I have a problem with this response because 1) masks don’t do shit, 2) people do not transmit COVID when they’re asymptomatic, 3) Fauci is a cheerleader for Remdesivir – which is total garbage – despite the fact effective therapeutics were being discovered at the time, and 4) the “vaccine” was ready in 10 months, not the 18 that Fauci predicted. While I don’t support the use of the shot in any way (I think it’s dangerous and will never take it), Trump should get more credit than he does for cutting through the red tape and getting it approved for emergency use in record time… Though if it ends up hurting millions of people none of that will matter and he’ll just end up being the fall guy.
Page 127 – On February 27, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Muhammad Burhan Majeed Rana. What’s in the email is not known as it is fully redacted. Fauci forwards the email to Jennifer Anderson on March 1st and instructs her to “Please take a look and handle.” Could this message have been related to a successful treatment?
Page 130 – On February 27, 2020, Fauci receives a shady email from a man named Howard Schatz. Schatz writes, “Watching the spread of the Coronavirus worldwide(?), I can’t help but feel for you, as well as the world’s population. It must be both challenging as well frustrating [sic] to be unable to control every important “leak” and then watching the consequences. I would think it’s also sort of exciting, while also being horrible, given this is what you’ve trained for most of your professional life…” I can’t be completely sure what the “leak” reference is about, but being that there are “consequences” I’d have to assume this person is talking about disease research leaking from a lab and causing a pandemic. In regard to the “exciting” comment, Fauci isn’t excited because he gets to work 18 hours a day putting all his training to good use. He could be excited, however, if the Frankenvirus he helped create was now purposely being used to alter the lives of billions of human beings.
Page 131 – On February 28, 2020, Fauci is again contacted by a “reporter” from National Panhandler Radio, this time David Folkenflik, inquiring about the NY Slimes fake censorship story. Folkenflik asks, “You told a colleague the report you couldn’t comment on Corona virus was taken out of context. In what way?” Fauci responds two days later by writing, “I have never been inhibited from interacting with the press.” I’m not sure why the first response wasn’t enough… Oh that’s right, it’s because Fauci told his colleague that him being muzzled by the White House was taken out of context.
Page 133 – On February 28, 2020, Fauci is contacted by the Managing Editor of ABC News’ Medical Unit, Eric Strauss. Strauss wants to know if the case/death estimate they got from a “DHS person” of a “worst case scenario 98m get COVID-19 and 500k dead” is accurate, asking, “If that a [sic] possible number for our planning? Or is that outlandish?” Fauci responds the next day writing, “That number seems exceptionally high.” Now at that time those numbers would seem high, but that was before effective therapeutics were suppressed and death counts were fudged around the country. The suspiciously low number of flu cases in the year 2020 would be a good example.
Page 134 and 135 – On February 28, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a doctor named William Sherman inquiring about whether the drug Ribavirin has been “assessed for an ability to slow down the replication of this virus.” In the partially redacted email Sherman writes, “Ribivirin [sic] is the only approved anti-viral that may have shown some clinical benefit against similar coronavirus infections, but the reports are anecdotal and the benefit short term. It was only administered to a few patients who were already on respirator support, and most still died. If their lungs were already destroyed, eliminating the virus would not change the outcome.” Just like hydroxychloroquine or ivermectin, it would seem when this drug is given to patients has a lot to do with the level of effectiveness. Not providing people with early treatments was a terrible decision, but one that was needed to worsen and prolong the pandemic. Think about it, just a few short years ago if you went to the doctor with a sniffle they would send you on your way with prescriptions for at least a couple of drugs, but when the COVID pandemic began people were just sent home with nothing and told to go to the hospital if their symptoms worsened. The suffering and death caused by COVID was inflicted intentionally. Fauci would respond the next day by forwarding the email to the possible cure hatchet woman Cristina Cassetti, writing, “Please take a look and handle. Thanks.” Fauci sends everything related to potential treatments to Cassetti.
Page 144 – On February 29, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a doctor named Barton Haynes. In the brief note Haynes praises Fauci’s press conference performance from earlier in the day and thanks him for “representing truth and science.” I wonder what Haynes now thinks of the developments regarding Fauci’s NIH funding the Wuhan lab, the NIH having a hand in the creation of COVID, and Fauci lying under oath about the gain of function research taking place at UNC Chapel Hill and the role Ralph Baric played in it. The dishonest Dr. Fauci represents only mad science and the dangers of it.
Pages 146 and 147 – On February 29, 2020, Fauci sends an email to Jennifer Routh asking her to “make sure” he gets the clips of his media appearances from earlier in the day. Fauci writes, “This AM I did NBC Today and MSNBC. Please make sure that I get the clips.” Apparently Fauci is a big fan of Fauci. I can picture him now… sitting on his couch at midnight, wearing his Washington Nationals onesie, pulling his masks up between bites of popcorn, thinking to himself, “Nobody does it like you, Antny. Bill’s gonna love these appearances.” Meanwhile, many of us are throwing up in our mouths.
Pages 148 and 149 – On February 29, 2020, a heavily redacted email exchange between The Twerp, Steve Holland and an unknown person (name is redacted) begins. The subject line reads, “Human lung mice.” Fauci responds to Holland the next day by writing “Lease [sic] the decision up to HHS.” I believe he meant “Leave the decision…”
Page 150 – On February 29, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Michael Specter, a sycophantic and deranged “reporter” from The New Yorker. Specter writes, “You are one of my very few heroes. And in case you have not seen it, here is my personal love letter to the president (in which you feature semi prominently).” By “personal love letter” he is referring to a pathetic hit piece he wrote and provides Fauci with the link to. The trash article pushes the lie that Fauci was being censored by the Trump administration.
Pages 153 through 155 – On February 29, 2020, Fauci is CC’d on an email to Vice President Pence. The email is from Drs. Paul and Karyl Stanton. They are writing to Pence, Fauci and others to inform them about hydroxychloroquine and its potential for treating COVID. The email reads in part, “Since we are both physicians, we have been following the details of the COVID19 outbreak closely. My husband was researching the anti-viral drug remdesivir this morning, and he came across some articles from Chinese studies that indicated a very well-known drug called hydroxychloroquine (already widely used for 70 years to treat malaria and rheumatological diseases) had very potent activity against COVID-19 infection and pneumonia. This was rather surprising to us, but as we read about the study and the characteristics of hydroxychloroquine, we realized that this could be a very good drug to use for the treatment of high-risk patients infected with COVID-19, who might deteriorate rapidly and progress to hospitalization and need for ICU care. Remdesivir also seems like an excellent anti-viral drug, but it is given intravenously, and is probably reserved for COVID-19 patients who are already entering into severe respiratory distress in the hospital. Hydroxychloroquine, on the other hand, is given orally, and is cheap and readily available… Because hydroxychloroquine in an [sic] older drug that is generic, current pharmaceutical companies have no incentive to do studies or research on its effectiveness for any new medical conditions. Therefore, the federal government would most likely have to construct and fund the studies.” I find it very interesting that saving the world from a disease outbreak doesn’t qualify as an “incentive” for pharmaceutical companies. That aside, the suggestion they are making is based on the results of a scientific study – possibly this one – not “anecdotal” data Fauci often uses to pooh pooh HCQ whenever it comes up. About 12:30AM on March 1st Fauci forwards the email to his hatchet woman Cristina Cassetti writing, “Please take a look and respond to them. Thanks.” What these doctors don’t seem to understand is that Fauci, the NIH and the FDA work for Big Pharma.
Pages 158 and 159 – On February 29, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Dr. Paul Alexander, an assistant professor at McMaster University, who offers to volunteer his time to help the administration’s pandemic response, as well as share information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of using corticosteroids to treat the coronavirus. Early in the email Alexander makes his support of President Trump known, writing, “I support this president fully.” I would imagine Fauci didn’t read past that line and just forwarded it to Cristina Cassetti so that she could “take a look at this and handle.”
Pages 160 and 161 – On February 29, 2020, Fauci receives an email from an engineer named Leslie Gardonyi asking if “Irbesartan, being an angiotensin receptor blocker, [can] possibly help prevent Coronavirus infections… since the Coronavirus entry to humans is via ACE-2?” Fauci responds directly by writing, “We are actually looking into the effect of ACE inhibitors on the coronavirus.” I wonder what the results were. Was a study done? Is it accessible to the public? Because I don’t recall Irbesartan ever being used as a treatment or even discussed. As far as I know, when you are diagnosed with COVID the doctor simply wishes you luck and you just go home and hope for the best.
Page 162 – On February 29, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a person named Ellen Butler. Even though I am not a doctor, I am going to go ahead and diagnose Ellen with a case of late stage Trump Derangement Syndrome. The email is only about a half dozen sentences long, yet it’s partially redacted. What we can see reads, “I just watched you this afternoon at the press conference. Over the years I have seen you and wondered along with family members if (redacted)… Also I just wanted to say how professional you are and that I don’t believe what #45 or his administration have to say regarding the coronavirus but have 100% confidence in what you say and do. Thank you for being the adult in the room. (redacted) I am very proud of you.” In addition to having a bad case of TDS, our friend Ellen also lacks discernment.
Pages 163 and 164 – On February 29, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a doctor (and lunatic) named Margaret Liu. Liu expresses concern that President Trump is causing attacks on Asians and “turning this epidemic into additional fear-mongering about ‘borders’” by rightfully pointing out where the disease originated from. Fauci responds by virtue signaling and writes, “On that issue, I have been vocal about making sure that we do not stigmatize Chinese people here in the USA or anywhere in relationship [sic] to the COVID-19 outbreak.” I would venture to say that most Americans do not equate the average Chinese person living in the US with the CCP, but that aside, it’s likely the Chinese government created COVID in a lab (using US funding) and that it was later released – accidentally or intentionally – and allowed to spread throughout the world. Liu should be blaming the media for creating the hysteria, though the hysteria is exactly what Fauci and company would later need to convince people to take an experimental injection. Since that was always part of the plan, it shouldn’t be too much of a surprise when ignorant, frightened people start attacking one another.
Pages 178 and 179 – On February 28, 2020, Fauci is contacted by a Ph.D. named Jingyue Ju. Ju suggests that NIH laboratories begin testing the effectiveness of chloroquine on people sick with COVID and provides a link to an already-completed study from the journal Nature. Unsurprisingly, Fauci forwards the email to Cristina Cassetti with the message, “Pls handle.” In other words, not gonna happen.
Page 183 – On February 28, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a man named Ed Charlton asking him to calm the public by putting the COVID numbers into better perspective. Charlton writes, “I’m concerned the public has lost perspective on COVID-19. At this point, it would seem the r0 and CFR are more similar to rubeola than they are to Ebola. Can we remind the public of that? Communicating that influenza will kill more Americans than SARS-2 hasn’t gained traction.” Fauci forwards the email to his favorite fixer, Cristina Cassetti, with the message “Please handle.” I’m sure what Ed didn’t realize was that Fauci’s goal was to let as many people as possible die by suppressing treatments while simultaneously labeling flu and pneumonia deaths as COVID deaths. This was done to promote hysteria and make millions of people crazy enough to eventually roll their sleeves up and participate in a mass medical experiment. Sorry to be redundant, but this is what people are failing to see about all of this.
Pages 195 through 205 – These pages are fully or partially redacted, including many of the names the email is Cc’d to.
Page 223 – On February 28, 2020, an email is sent to Dr. Fauci, Francis Collins (NIH Director) and Michael Gottesman (NIH Deputy Director) by an NIH staff scientist named Luz Blanco. Blanco is reaching out with an idea that “might sound weird” but that she believes can “reduce the coronavirus infection and spreading.” It is apparently “very simple but can get more complex as well.” Unfortunately, the email is redacted at the point where she shares her idea.
Page 226 – An email from Nayan Patel to Cedric Sumimoto is fully redacted.
Page 230 – On February 27, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Kyra Phillips, an investigative correspondent from ABC. After a few sentences of sucking up, Phillips asks Fauci to keep her in the loop on all things COVID, tells him that she respects the “unique situation” he’s in, and suggests that he speak to her off the record “if need be.” Fauci responded to her the next day with a simple “Thanks, Kyra.”
Page 232 – On February 27, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a lunatic named Suzanne Bradley with the subject line reading “URGENT.” Bradley writes, “I understand Vice President Pence has ordered you to not inform the public about Coronavirus without approval. This is quite terrifying, especially since Trump has already shown his desire to spread false or incomplete information about this public health crisis.” She then asks if it’s safe to fly domestically. Fauci responded to her the next day by calling the claim that he is being silenced by Pence “misinformation” and informing her that he is in no way being muzzled by the VP… he also tells her flying domestically is safe.
Page 240 and 241 – On February 27, 2020, Fauci is contacted by Donna Young, a “Senior Reporter” on healthcare from S&P Global News, about the false claim the NY Slimes spread about him being muzzled by the White House. When she does not hear back – after only four hours – she sends another email asking if she will eventually get a response or comment about this. Courtney Billet responds to her the next day by writing, “Donna, so sorry, it’s been a crazy day. We are not sure exactly where this came from. It’s not true.” See the chain reaction that gets set off when the Slimes makes up partisan lies?
Pages 281 and 282 – On February 26, 2020, Fauci receives fan mail from a sycophant named Sharon Perlman. Two-thirds of the email is redacted. I believe she is a doctor based in NY, though I’m not entirely sure about that. What I am sure about is that Sharon is deranged. Listen to this: “Hi Dr. Fauci, As I was watching my favorite CNN news show starring Chris Cuomo last night, to my delight, there you were! And again, this morning with John Berman and Alisyn Camerota on New Day…” Magilla Gorilla is her favorite?? Yuck! If this woman can’t see XiNN’s mindless propaganda for what it is, there’s no way I would trust her with my health. But that’s just me.
Page 284 – On February 26, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Morgan Fairchild asking how she can help and about what information to disseminate to her “almost 100,00 Twitter followers.” Fauci responds the next day by writing, “It would be great if you could tweet to your many Twitter followers that although the current risk of coronavirus to the American public is low, the fact that there is community spread of virus in a number of countries besides China… poses a risk that we may progress to a global pandemic of COVID-19. If that occurs we will surely have many more cases in the USA. And so for that reason, the American public should not be frightened, but should be prepared to mitigate an outbreak in this country by measures that include social distancing, teleworking, temporary closure of schools, etc. There is nothing to be done right now since there are so few cases in this country and these cases are being properly isolated, and so go about your daily business. However, be aware that behavioral adjustments may need to be made if a pandemic occurs.” I find it interesting that when doctors contact him offering treatment ideas he tends to blow them off or has Cristina Cassetti handle it, yet when a celebrity contacts him offering access to their Twitter followers he gives them the full breakdown of the situation. This tells me that Fauci desires to be a star like Fairchild, and so he’s willing to make the extra time for her.
Page 299 – On February 26, 2020, Fauci exchanges emails with Elizabeth Laurencot, a senior editor at the New England Journal of Medicine. The exchange is fully redacted, but Laurencot – or “Eli” – wrote to him looking for clarification on something.
Pages 346 and 347 – On February 25, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Donald G. McNeil Jr., “a science and health reporter specializing in plagues and pestilences” from the NY Slimes. McNeil is writing to him to tell him about how “heroically” the Chinese people were “in the face of the virus” while in America people tended to “act like selfish pigs interested only in saving themselves.” McNeil goes on to criticize the tone of the HHS briefings, calling it an “aggressive, defensive, almost smart-alecky ‘we got this’ tone,” before kissing Fauci’s ass by writing “The only time the tone was right when you were the third to take the mike [sic] and explain things to that kid shouting from the back without a mike [mic] about ‘What’s the real message? What do we do?’” In addition to abbreviating microphone with the word “mike” (the correct abbreviation is “mic”), he also wrote “I dunno” when lamenting about an “appalling article” he had read earlier about quarantining soldiers returning to Alabama. That’s not a good sign being that this guy is a writer. McNeil also asks Fauci about whether there is a plan to start “mentally preparing Americans to work together in the face of the crisis.” The only reply he is given is “You make some very good points, Donald” from a person whose name is redacted. Donald seems like just another unimpressive leftist NY Slimes mouthpiece.
Pages 355 through 357 – On February 25, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a XiNN Business reporter named Hanna Ziady who has a “few questions regarding the Moderna vaccine.” After inquiring about when a vaccine may become available, Ziady writes, “The company is characterizing this as a vaccine. Strictly speaking, what should it be referred to as?” Interestingly, Fauci concludes his reply later that day by writing “It is characterized as a ‘vaccine’.” with the word “vaccine” in quotes (and with the period incorrectly outside the quotation marks). The reason why I’ve been using quotation marks throughout this timeline is because these injections are gene therapies, not traditional vaccines. I wonder if Fauci did that for the same reason…
Pages 360 through 362 – On February 25, 2020, Fauci exchanges emails with oncologist and “bioethicist” Ezekiel Emanuel. Emanuel wants to know if he’s “blind” because he’s “having a hard time seeing this as serious as everyone else” while pointing out how the coronavirus is only a significant threat to the elderly and those with preexisting conditions. A couple of hours later, Fauci replies by writing that while the mortality rate for COVID will likely be less than the projected 2.5%, a 0.5% rate would make this pandemic as deadly as the pandemics that occurred in 1957 and 1968. Fauci concluded his reply with “In other words, it could be worse than you think.” Fifteen minutes later Emanuel writes back with some hypothetical numbers before asking if Fauci thinks the infections will die down when the warmer weather arrives. Fauci replies by writing, “It may well diminish somewhat as weather gets warmer. However, there is no guarantee that this will occur. More likely that it will become seasonal and go down in our summer and resurge next winter.” How does Fauci know that this will be how things play out? Past pandemics didn’t become “seasonal.” Could it be because he knows exactly what type of virus he and the Chicoms cooked up in Wuhan?
Pages 449 and 450 – On February 24, 2020, Fauci exchanges emails with Stewart Simonson, the Assistant Director-General of the World Health Organization. Fauci forwards him an article sent to him by Bloomberg reporter John Lauerman writing, “Here is another article in which I strongly support Tedros.” Simonson replies by writing “Thank you – he is grateful for your help, Tony. He is in a unwindable situation but he is doing what is right and with integrity. (Redacted). As do I – (Redacted). I really appreciate it.” Dr. Tedros is doing what’s right and doing it with integrity?? Give me a break! I also can’t help wondering about what needed to be redacted as this seems to be a somewhat mundane exchange.
Pages 454 through 456 – On February 24, 2020, Fauci exchanges emails with an FDA pharmacologist by the name of Philip Gatti regarding the use of chloroquine/HCQ for the treatment of COVID. The first email is from Gatti to Fauci asking if there is any “indication/data to substantiate this claim from China (attached publication) that chloroquine/hydroxychloroquine can decrease COVID-19 infections and lung disease.” Fauci responds by saying there is no data to review in what he was sent so he would have “no way of evaluating their claim.” Gatti gets back to him right away with an attachment including data from a 2005 study (likely this study). Late that night Fauci sends two emails to Hilary Marston, the NIH’s Medical Officer and Policy Advisor for Pandemic Preparedness, about a minute apart, each with a different attachment. The first attachment reads “Chloroquine and SARS.pdf” and the second “chloroquine.pdf.” It’s safe to assume that nothing ever came out of this, not even one additional NIH study. Was Marston’s job to begin figuring out how to explain this data away?
Pages 462 and 463 – On the night of February 25, 2020, a man by the name of Patrick Brennan reaches out to about 30 people at NIH (half of whom are redacted) to get input about an op-ed draft written by White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro. Brennan asks for “edits/recommendations/affirmative clearance from FDA, CDC, NIAID, ASFR, and ASPR” and requests a response by 10am the following day. Courtney Billet forwards the op-ed to Fauci (he was not included in the original email sent by Brennan) in an email stating, “This is an oped for [sic] Peter Navarro. We are asked for comments by 10am Weds. (Complicating things a little, he was apparently just on with Tucker Carlson stating parts of it verbatim. So, hopefully this is accurate!)” She also included the 10am deadline in the subject line. Fauci would eventually respond the next day about five hours after the deadline by simply writing, “I do not have time for this. Sorry.” It seems America’s top doc only has time for the propagandists/sycophants in the MSM or his Chicom cohorts, not a perceived political opponent looking for input and suggestions before publishing an article. This is because Fauci knows that he can appear on whatever leftist program he wants after it’s published to contradict its contents, a luxury Navarro doesn’t have. Everything Fauci does is political and part of a bigger agenda.
Pages 506 and 507 – On February 22, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Kevin Thurm, the CEO of the Clinton Foundation. Thurm is just writing to suck up and let Fauci know how much he “deeply appreciate[s]” his “on-going public service.” Gross.
Page 522 – On February 21, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Michael Jacobs, a NY-based dermatologist and professor from Cornell University, on behalf of himself and a virologist from Rockefeller University named Alexander Tarakhovsky. Both were “alarmed” by the news that the Chinese government was sterilizing the paper money in the Hubei Province and “think that there is a possibility that the virus was released from a lab in Wuhan, the biotech area of China.” They “also think the virus might be complexed with another organism, such as a yeast or fungus, to make it more sticky,” and wished to speak about the issue with him. The next day Fauci would forward the email to Cristina Cassetti with his usual request: “Please handle this.”
Pages 554 and 555 – On February 20, 2020, Fauci receives two emails from NY Slimes reporter Donald McNeil about 30 minutes apart inquiring about the details of a story written in the Washington Compost. Seeking confirmation, McNeil wrote, “The Washington Post has just put up a story saying that the 14 infected passengers on the buses containing 238 American passengers from the Diamond Princess were flown home AGAINST the CDC’s advice. And that the States [sic] Department overruled the CDC on this.” The story cites an anonymous source who was “involved in the decision” and who could be completely fictitious. The MSM loves to make stories up out of thin air using anonymous sources, especially when it comes to the Trump Administration – both during and after. I’m assuming this was a hit piece since the gist is how Trump’s State Department went against the CDC (aka – “the science”) and the word “against” was written in all caps. The next day Fauci responded by writing, “Donald: You know that I always answer your calls and e-mails [sic], but this one I want to stay away from. Sorry. Best, Tony.” I’m guessing The Twerp wanted to stay away from “this one” because he knew that it was just another ridiculous and fictional hit piece.
Page 556 – On February 20, 2020, Fauci receives a sycophantic email from Richard Allen Johnson, a Boston-based dermatologist. Johnson writes, “We watched a life size ASF as you discussed and reassured us about Covid-19. You are simply the best. Were you running for president, I am sure that you would win the yote [sic]. Don’t forget our lunch in Boston.” President Fauci? Gimme a break, Dick.
Pages 592 through 594 – On the morning of February 19, 2020, Fauci exchanges emails with Jon LaPook (who will henceforth be referred to as Jon LaPuke), the Chief Medical Correspondent for C(omplete)BS News. LaPuke was looking for answers to a series of questions (and fishing for compliments) including whether or not a COVID mutation could be worse than the original strain for young people and whether older people could have “been primed by an earlier coronavirus infection.” The Twerp responds minutes later by downplaying his concern and explaining that younger people are always exposed to coronaviruses and that we would have already seen the effect of such “priming” had it occurred – “but anything is possible.” A few minutes later LaPuke follows up with “Got it. What does it mean that I’m waking up thinking about coronavirus? : )” to which Fauci replies, “It means that you are an outstanding and committed journalist. 😊” Aw, isn’t that sweet? I don’t know about you, but I’m disturbed by senior citizens who are supposedly professionals using smiley faces in their emails.
Pages 644 and 645 – On February 17, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a woman named Jolonda Dillman (the titles beneath her name are redacted) about the “real status of the Coronavirus in China.” Dillman claims that her info comes from a nurse working in Harbin, China. Motivated by feelings of “trepidation” she writes, “…the numbers being released of confirmed deaths is drastically low due to the spread being too fast to test. Deaths in hospital hallways and of medical staff is not being shared in order to prevent panic. Protective gear is unavailable and the nurse writing the correspondence is fearful for her life. She states that there are five levels of screenings (tests?) before a person is reported as testing positive or of being infected with the virus. If someone dies before being confirmed, these suspected deaths are covered up and not reported. Reported numbers, even of confirmed cases are grossly undercounted. I figure you and our government realize the information and numbers coming out of China are highly inaccurate, but this correspondence… confirms it. I felt it was only ethical and moral to report this, despite (redacted) plea that the two people involved in the correspondence fear governmental retribution if it was discovered that they discussed or passed on this confidential information. I report this and swear it to be true and confidential. I am trusting it will help in some way and not just stir panic.” Unsurprisingly, Fauci responds later that night by forwarding the email to Cristina Cassetti and asking her to “Please have someone respond to this person.”
Pages 697 through 701 – On the morning of May 5, 2020, Fauci receives an email from an Austrian “Organizational Consultant” named Gerald Glockenstein, who is looking for Fauci to review the mitigation strategy he has been tasked by the Austrian government to come up with. The proposal is very common sense and calls for 1) “Keep the virus 100% (totally) away from people older than 60 with pre-existing illnesses,” 2) “Minimize possible contact with virus for people older than 60 without pre-existing illnesses,” and 3) “Handle the rest of the population with care, but keep them going and working – as you would do in an influenza-season.” The subtext for each of the three points includes other things like testing, distancing, masking, and contact tracing – things widely considered to be normal and accepted mitigation strategies. A couple of hours later Fauci forwards the email to Andrea Lerner writing “Not a crazy note. Please respond on my behalf. Thanks.” I guess he sends all the “crazy” stuff that doesn’t fit the government’s narrative exclusively to Cristina Cassetti? A few hours later, Lerner responds by writing “I will respond. Here is what I propose to say (in addition to thanking him). Let me know if you’d change anything:” Unfortunately, the entirety of her suggestions are redacted. Fauci would respond later that night by writing “Looks fine.” What was so secret that these suggestions needed to be redacted? Were they telling Glockenstein that most of the mitigation measures we were using in the US didn’t actually do anything to prevent the spread and severity of COVID? We may never know.
Page 702 – On May 5, 2020, Fauci receives an interview request from Giuseppe Sarcina of the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera. Sarcina, a D.C.-based correspondent for the paper writes in part, “I understood that you are looking at the italian case with great attention. I wonder if you can grant me a short interview. I have sent an email march 21. But then I saw that you spoke with an other [sic] italian newspaper. So I would like to have a chance to have your voice for our Readers as well. Corriere della Sera is a newspaper based in Milano, Lombardy, The region most affected by the coronavirus.” I’m not sure how long Sarcina has been living in the US, but his grammar sucks. A few hours later, a redacted author sends an email to Patricia Conrad saying, “Please try to get clearance. This is the top newspaper in Italy.” Now I know I’m cynical, but I can’t help but ask: Who would give a shit that this is the “top newspaper” in Italy unless they were looking to achieve international stardom? Oh, I know who… Anthony Fauci.
Pages 712 through 716 – On May 4, 2020, Fauci receives a very insightful email from a man named Ola Melhus. I’m not sure who this person is (perhaps this pathologist), but his take is spot on. After beginning the email with facts about how COVID is not as deadly as people are making it out to be (because a truly deadly virus would kill more and spread less) and asking “How can this happen? How can the doctors be so blind?” Melhus drops a truth bomb on Fauci writing, “It seems that the coronavirus has affected the brain more in a certain group in society, namely politicians, doctors, journalists and other with power and positions in the society. The virus is not dangerous for this group, but it’s opens a door in the brain’s cell wall that allows it to enter the fear center of the brain. This door has been closed for many years. We haven’t had any major wars and nothing has threatened them. They have felt invulnerable. Convinced of their own superior ability and greatness. Not only can they control the people, they can now control the climate by turning the carbon dioxide tap. If they close it, the temperature drops, if they open it the temperature goes up. They don’t know that the sun is 109 times as big as our planet. 109 times. It seams [sic] so small when we look up in the sky. They thought they could control everything. Then came the VIRUS, they receive an abrupt awakening. They get scared. Politicans [sic] get sick and die. Doctors die. The brain is attacked by fear virus. They can no longer think clearly and logically. The panic is near, they are reminded of their own mortality. Just like a virus in a computer. It’s [sic] slows it down and it becomes unusable. Thats whats happen [sic] when a fear virus attacks the brain. Here where I live, there are panic over 1600 confirmed cases. The television is talking ‘infected persons’ when there is ‘confirmed laboratory cases.’ It’s two different things. Misleading the people. Why panic over 1600 infected? Closing all not nessecary [sic] buissness [sic], all schools, all except for supermarket, gas station, banks. You can’t go out after 5.00 pm. If you do, you get arrested. Why? They are scared. Because the ruling class is afraid. Everyone with this masks. Doctors crying on television. The President with mask. They are scared. Doctors. Journalists. Polices. 2020. The year when the world got completely crazy. You have an medical obligation to inform the world about the truth.” Unfortunately, just days later, The Twerp would tell NY Slimes reporter Sheryl Gay Stolberg that Americans will suffer “needless suffering and death” if we were to reopen the country too soon. And Stolberg, being the good little propagandist that she is, typed the fear mongering right up for him and it was printed the same day. You see, to Fauci, fear is the name of the game – it always has been. The only difference is that this time around the goal isn’t just profits, it’s the complete restructuring and depopulation of our planet. As Melhus correctly points out, fear will prevent people from thinking in a clear and logical way. This is why we are inundated with case counts, death tolls, and doomsday predictions about what will come without our complete and total submission to “the science.” Fauci would send the email over to Andrea Lerner the next day with the message: “Please take a look and decide. Thanks.” Decide what? Whether or not to round this thinking person up and imprison them? Too many people don’t understand that Fauci’s job isn’t to right the ship that is America, his job is to make sure we hit the iceberg.
Pages 758 and 759 – On May 3, 2020, Fauci receives another email from his buddy, Chief Medical Correspondent from C(omplete)BS News Jon LaPuke. After the usual sucking up, LaPuke provides a link to a news segment he did titled “No time to abandon science.” Needless to say, the video is a steaming pile of hot garbage. It begins by LaPuke falsely claiming that the drug Remdesivir is effective at treating COVID. Not only is this claim quite dubious, but the drug itself is unsafe and ridiculously expensive (which is the real reason Fauci touts it as “the standard of care”). He even had the audacity to bring up the HIV drug AZT that was used in the late 1980s, and speak about it as if it were some type of miracle. It wasn’t. LaPuke continues, “Science. Good old reliable science. Something to cherish and embrace. Which brings us to right now… (As you can probably imagine, the cringe factor is completely off the charts)… You can understand why people are starting to get fed up with staying home (video of various kooks protesting – one holding a Gadsden flag, others waving American flags – is playing while he speaks), and some states are tempted to open up sooner than they should. But this is a moment to double down on science, not abandon it. That said, give yourself a break. This is hard, and it’s been months of fewer hugs.” He then shares a corny anecdote about this dad and the “defense mechanisms” he used to deal with the passing of his wife, and how he had to come to grips with the fact that she was gone (the whole story made me want to LaPuke). He finally wraps things up by referring to Fauci as a “talented, devoted scientist” and saying we must “continue to have faith in science.” Unsurprisingly, Fauci responds later that evening by writing “Terrific piece on ‘:No time to abandon science’! [sic] Keep up this great work. We need to stay on course.” The course he is referring to is the one that plows directly into the iceberg I just mentioned. Not only did “science” fail us by creating COVID in a lab in Wuhan, but every single mitigation measure we have taken – from masks to lockdowns – was ineffective and destructive to the economy and our overall health. These people live in a fantasy world.
Pages 791 through 795 – Between April 30 and May 2, 2020, Fauci exchanges emails with Ezekiel Emanuel. Emanuel begins the series of messages by writing in part “I am a bit perplexed by your seeming strong endorsement of remdesivir. Was it just a bit forced? My reading was the data were weak and in normal times for normal disease it is not enough to to approve. And very unlikely to really impact COVID-19 disease pattern – regardless of supply issues.” Fauci responds a few hours later by writing, “Zeke: I did not ‘strongly’ endorse it. I specifically said that it was not a knockout drug and was only a baby step in the direction of developing more and better drugs. I said that it was important because it proved in a well-powered, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial that one can suppress the virus enough to see a clinical effect, as modest as the effect was. I do not think I forced anything.” Emanuel responds about an hour later apologizing for “misreading” what Fauci said. This concluded the meaningful portion of the exchange. What Emanuel was originally referring to was an informal press conference from April 29th, where Fauci claimed “The data shows that Remdesivir has a clear cut, significant, positive effect in diminishing the time to recovery… It’s highly significant. If you look at time to recovery being shorter in the Remdesivir arm, it was 11 days compared to 15 days, and that’s a P-value – for the scientists that are listening – of 0.001. So that’s something that, although a 31% improvement doesn’t seem like a knockout 100%, it is a very important proof of concept because what it is proving is that a drug can block this virus… we think looking forward this is very optimistic. The mortality rate trended towards being better in the sense of less deaths in the Remdesivir group. 8% versus 11% in the placebo group. It has not yet reached statistical significance, but the data needs to be further analyzed. The reason why we’re making the announcement now… whenever you have clear cut evidence that a drug works you have an ethical obligation to immediately let the people who are in the placebo group know so that they can have access. And all the other trials that are taking place now have a new standard of care.” This guy wouldn’t know ethics if they bludgeoned him over the head. Moreover, if you look at The Scarf Lady’s body language as she is sitting next to him listening to this nonsense, it’s clear she is very uncomfortable with what he’s saying. Reading Robert Kennedy’s book The Real Anthony Fauci will help provide context for Fauci’s remarks, and provide clarity about just how unethical what he’s doing and saying is. The Twerp has made a career out of this type of bullshitting. On the one hand he is saying the results of the trial are “highly significant,” before saying just a few sentences later that results have “not yet reached statistical significance.” It’s Orwellian doublespeak of the worst kind. And unblinding a study ruins the study because you no longer have two different groups to compare. He knows this and is outright lying to an ignorant media, an ignorant public, and unfortunately, an ignorant president. Emanuel was right to question his remarks and should not have backed down when Fauci denied what everyone heard him say.
Pages 808 and 809 – On May 1, 2020, Fauci emails Jennifer Routh asking “Can we please make sure that I get the lips [sic] from yesterday from NBC Today Show and CNN Town Hall with Sanjay and Anderson.” I guess he didn’t use a question mark because he was telling her? In any case, she sends them over to him about two hours later. What a freaking egomaniac this guy is!
Pages 823 and 824 – On May 1, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a person named Ato Stephens. Stephens is writing to share some of his observations and to make suggestions about how we should treat COVID patients going forward. First he describes an audio clip (that he provides for Fauci) about how COVID may be a virus that attacks blood cells and suggests that US doctors “need to loom [sic] at treatment in a different light.” Next he describes how doctors in the UK were having much better results using ventilators for sleep apnea instead of intubation, which was resulting in very high death rates (the same was true for people being intubated in the US). Stephens then points out that death rates in the African countries might be so low because of the prevalent use of hydroxychloroquine throughout the continent. Stephens writes in part, “I know some clinical trials have shown hydroxychloroquine not to be effective in the treatment of covid 19 in very ill patients. However, my hypothesis is, are the low death rates in Africa linked to the fact that malaria is very prevelant [sic] in Africa, and lots of Africans take antimalarial drugs, making them less susceptible to covid 19, hence the low death rate.” Fauci responds by writing, “Thank you for you [sic] note. We will know soon whether hydroxychloroquine has any beneficial effects as the results of randomized, controlled trials become available. The pathogenesis of COVID-19 is still an open question. You are correct in that there is a more recent tendency to use ventilators only as a very last resort since oxygenation rather than ventilation appears to be key to recovery.” Despite Fauci’s claim, HCQ is still demonized by leftist politicians and the media regardless of the now over 400 studies showing that HCQ is effective at both treating and preventing COVID.
Pages 895 and 896 – On April 27, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Paolo Lusso about a drug regimen being used by a Dr. Viecca that is proving to be successful. Lusso writes in part, “They started from the pathological observation that all patients dying of Covid-19 pneumonia had diffuse pulmonary microthrombosis. Since they detected almost exclusively white thrombi, they reasoned that they had to block platelet activation/aggregation, while heparin would be ineffective at that stage. Thus, they treated a first group of five critical patients with potent anti-aggregant therapy (Tirofiban/Aggrastat) and apparently in all of them the p02 started to rise within less than 2 hours, they got off the ventilators and went on to full recovery. Viecca is an interventional cardiologist (redacted). I sent copy [sic] of his protocol and contact information to Joe.” By Joe he is referring to Joseph Kovacs, a senior investigator in the NIH Clinical Center’s Critical Care Medicine Department, who is CC’d on the email. Sounds promising, yet Fauci responded late that night by simply writing back “Thanks, Paolo.” Did we ever even give this treatment a try?
Pages 1,013 and 1,014 – On April 23, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Dani Bolognesi, a professor of surgery and virology at Duke University. Bolognesi comes off excited about “something of potential importance” and “whether it could fit in the toolbox” being put together to treat/deal with COVID. Unfortunately, the entirety of his proposal/suggestion is redacted. The fact Fauci forwarded the email to Cristina Cassetti late that night tells me that it was something that had promise and needed quashing.
Pages 1,030 and 1,031 – On March 27, 2020, Fauci sends an announcement out to the employees of NIAID warning about a shortage of blood platelets, and to let employees know about a coming platelet drive. The announcement reads in part, “I encourage participation of all employees who are eligible to provide a donation to benefit our NIH patients. I understand employees may be hesitant to participate under the current conditions, but I would like to reassure you that blood donation is a safe process.” The shortage is an unforeseen consequence directly related to his own incessant fear-mongering about a virus that was never deadly for most, and quite treatable.
Pages 1,063 through 1,066 – On April 20, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Greg Folkers, the Chief of Staff at NIAID, containing an article from the South China Morning Post. The article fear-mongers about COVID’s potential to mutate and suggests these mutations will be even deadlier. The article makes reference to a study conducted by Professor Li Lanjuan and her colleagues from Zhejiang University, though it is not peer-reviewed. Undeterred, Fauci forwards the article to Barney Graham, a 20 year investigator for the NAIAD’s Vaccine Research Center, and asks him what he thinks. It’s interesting – and telling – how Fauci wants to run with this information regardless of the fact that it is not peer-reviewed data, yet when it comes to anecdotal data about ivermectin or HCQ, Fauci insists that the information is not reliable no matter how effective the drugs appear to be when people use them. Making matters worse is the fact that Fauci has done nothing meaningful to get to the bottom of whether these drugs actually work (which we know they do), and it doesn’t appear that he ever will going forward – no matter how many continue to die from this treatable disease… At the end of the day, they planned to get their emergency use authorization by any means necessary, and regardless of whatever the cost in lives might be.
Pages 1,109 through 1,111 – On April 21, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a deranged lunatic named Joan Hussey, a former NIH employee of 25 years. Judging by what she wrote in her message, Hussey is likely an avid follower of mainstream news outlets like XiNN and the NY Slimes. In addition to profusely thanking him for doing a terrible job and being wrong about mostly everything, she parrots some of the mainstream, anti-Trump talking points commonly used by mindless leftists. For example, she thanks Fauci for “trying to expertly guide a president who seems more preoccupied with his own image (and sound of his own voice), and political aspirations than with the actual well being of his country’s citizens.” Hussey then goes on to state all the things she’s doing personally to combat COVID – coming off like a six-year-old that’s looking for the approval of an adult in the process – by writing “We all have been diligent about staying at home (redacted) ordering food and other things to be delivered to our house (we all wash our hands ‘religiously’). (Redacted) is the only one of us who occasionally goes to a grocery store or drug store if necessary and then, he always wears a mask, gloves, and keeps at least six feet between himself and anyone else, and gets in and out as quickly as possible. In addition, (redacted) are so intent on keeping me well and alive, we haven’t even, any of us, physically visited with each other, in person, inside our house for months. In the past two months, I’ve been outside only four times – twice on our deck and twice in my car, dropping off a couple of shopping bags at a friend’s house and at (redacted) group home – both times leaving the bags in the driveway, and then driving right back home. I’m so thankful for FaceTime, but we miss hugs and kisses. I know all this must sound extreme, and it is, but I’m terrified of becoming a statistic so we’re doing whatever we can to stay healthy for ourselves and one another. (Large redaction – why?). My family is hearing what you’re saying and taking your advice. I’m sorry this email is so long but my intention, more than anything, is to thank you for your wisdom and advice, both grounded in years of experience.” Wow. This is not only pathetic, but extremely sad. This woman is thanking Fauci for needlessly holding society hostage and helping to implement the mitigation measures that drastically reduced her own quality of life. There’s a term for that, it’s called Stockholm Syndrome.
Page 1,119 – On April 20, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Natalie Hurst informing him that there will be no Coronavirus Task Force meeting on April 21st. Fauci responds to her later that night by writing, “Yikes………………….. That would make 4 days in a row without a Press Conference for me – Saturday, Sunday, Monday and tomorrow 😊😊.” Little does he know it’s us thinking people who are smiling.
Page 1,150 – On April 18, 2020 Fauci receives an email from Peter Daszak of EcoHealth Alliance, the organization that was taking NIH grant money and sending it to the Wuhan Institute of Virology to engage in risky gain-of-function research. In the message Daszak thanks him for downplaying the possibility of a lab leak and insisting wrongly that COVID had a natural origin, writing “I just wanted to say a personal thankyou on behalf of our staff and collaborators, for publicly standing up and stating that the scientific evidence supports a natural origin for COVID-19 from a bat-to-human spillover, not a lab release from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. (Large redaction). From my perspective, your comments are brave, and coming from your trusted voice, will help dispel the myths being spun around the virus’ origins. Once this pandemic’s over I look forward thanking [sic] you in person and let [sic] you know how important your comments are to us all.” Make no mistake, this is one mad scientist thanking another for engaging in a cover up and lying about the origin of a disease that has killed millions of people worldwide. There is much more evidence available to support the lab leak theory (or the intentional release theory for that matter) than there is supporting a natural animal-to-human “spillover” as there is no evidence that supports the latter.
Page 1,168 – On April 25, 2020, Fauci receives an email from the Editor-in-Chief of the New England Journal of Medicine, Eric Rubin, informing him that his submission – “A Strategic Approach to Successful COVID-19 Vaccine Development” – has not been accepted for publication. Rubin writes in part, “After considering its focus, content, and interest, we made the editorial decision not to consider your submission further.” Fauci responds about 20 minutes later by simply writing “Let us discuss next steps.” I guess Fauci doesn’t understand what “we made the editorial decision not to consider your submission further” means. Moreover, Rubin already told him the next step – submit the paper elsewhere. I can’t help wondering why the work of such a well-connected doctor like Fauci was rejected. Perhaps the issue is what Fauci considers a “success” since these injections don’t stop those who take it from catching and spreading COVID. In any case, it would seem like I’m not the only one who’s been thoroughly unimpressed by this guy.
Pages 1,198 and 1,199 – On April 23, 2020, Fauci receives yet another fawning email, this time from a sycophant named Timothy Broas. Broas is apparently an old friend as he begins the message by taking The Twerp for a stroll down memory lane… then the bootlicking begins. Broas writes, “Meantime, thank you for your service to our country , indeed the world. You have been a solid, wise, steady voice, Tony, and, despite all the naysayers and fools on social media, you have earned the respect of billions of people. I am very proud of you, and am humbled and honored that I can call you my friend. I hope you and your family are well, and staying safe. The Broas family is doing well, thanks in no small part to your daily advice and objective analysis. Thank you!” I’ve never been more proud to be called a fool. Fauci funded the creation of this virus and is therefore directly responsible for millions of deaths and billions of infections worldwide. Like it or not Timbo, your “friend” is a mad scientist and a lying sociopath.
Pages 1,262 through 1,265 – On April 14, 2020, Fauci receives an email from someone whose name is redacted, but who describes himself as “the antiterrorism and insider threat officer for the Office of the Surgeon General (Army)/U.S. Army Medical Command” and a government employee “for nearly thirty-four years.” This person is writing to Fauci to ask questions they could easily find answers to in just a few minutes using simple Google searches. The questions are as follows: 1) How do you recommend I reassure our staff on dealing with the stressors of COVID-19? 2) Can C0VID-19 be contracted from a corpse? 3) If someone has been a user of HCQ for years, are they susceptible to contracting C0VID-19? 4) Are masks and gloves truly effective [and], if so, why are so many medical professionals contracting the virus? and 5) What is the most important thing we should be doing, other than social distancing? This person then adds an additional question, but doesn’t number it. The question is: “Finally, what keeps you up at night, regarding C0VID-19?” My God. Is it possible to be more of a suck-up? The Twerp provides answers for each of the first five questions – and the add-on question – in a by-number fashion, answering the last with, “I have said in the past that what keeps me up at night is the possibility of a pandemic respiratory infection. We are in that reality now, and what keeps me up at night is the response, a major part of which is the development of an effective vaccine and treatments for COVID-19.” I’d imagine it’s hard to sleep with visions of sheep carrying big bags of cash and jumping over fences dancing around in your head. Only read his answers if you enjoy reading anti-HCQ propaganda and disinformation about masks. Interestingly, Fauci begins his answer to question number four with “I believe…” It doesn’t surprise me that the person seeking Fauci’s advice has worked in the government for over three decades. They have learned to never think for themself.
Pages 1,285 and 1,286 – On April 17, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Hannalore Ehrenreich, a clinical neuroscientist with the Max Planck Institute of Experimental Medicine/Max Planck Society, about COVID-19 therapeutics. Ehrenreich writes, “In light of the present therapeutic situation in COVID-19, any measure to improve course and outcome of seriously affected individuals is of utmost importance. In the attached… (Unfortunately this section of the email is redacted). We all would be extremely grateful for your feedback and for your collaboration! In fact, I personally would be so proud to have you as senior coauthor as in former times! Please let me know what you think.” Fauci responds the next day by forwarding the message to Andrea Lerner and writing, “Andrea: This is a former post-doc in my lab. Please read this, get back to her apologizing that I could not respond (redacted). I obviously can have no part in it.” This exchange is quite intriguing. A doctor and assumed former colleague is writing to Fauci in what I would describe as an excited manner, yet Fauci passes off his response to Andrea Lerner – who I assume handles responses to emails sent to Fauci that he doesn’t deride as “crazy” – and asks her to express his regret in “obviously” not being able to assist her. Why is he not able to? Is his wagon already hitched (in addition to being bought and paid for) to other therapeutic endeavors, namely gene therapy “vaccines,” that have been invested in for years by Bill Gates, the NIH and other cogs in the machine that is driving modern society into complete dependence on Big Pharma?
Page 1,311 – On April 16, 2020, an apparently flustered Francis Collins, Director of the NIH, emails Fauci with the subject line reading “conspiracy gains momentum.” The entire email is redacted aside from a link to an article by Mediaite titled “Fox’s Bret Baier: Sources ‘Increasingly Confident’ Coronavirus Outbreak Started in Wuhan Lab.” The next day Fauci responds – around 3AM – with a very short response that is also completely redacted. The article itself is nothing too groundbreaking as it basically summarizes an appearance by Brett Baier on Sean Hannity’s Fox News program. During the appearance, Baier tells Hannity that sources have confirmed to him that COVID came out of the Wuhan Institute of Virology, though he insists to Hannity that this was an accident and not a bioweapon attack. Baier also said that his sources are “100 percent confident that China altered the data, the statistics. They did a lot of things to contain the information. Meanwhile, they cut down, as you mentioned, travel from Wuhan internally, but left the international flights going, and there obviously is how you have a spread like this.” Intentionally letting infected people board flights destined for other countries sure sounds like a bioweapon attack to me. And why was the entirety of the exchange between Fauci and his boss fully redacted?
Pages 1,319 through 1,323 – On April 8, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a doctor named Josh Backon. Backon is urging Fauci to consider the use of multiple antiviral agents, including chloroquine and ivermectin, and other natural antiviral agents like turmeric, ginger and N-Acetyl Cysteine for treating and preventing COVID. The email contains quite a few links about the treatments he is suggesting. Backon also tells Fauci that he believes “EVERYONE should take these items” (Backon uses all caps in the email). The next day Amanda Coleman responds to him by writing in part, “We very much appreciate the information you’ve provided, and I am sharing your updates with the relevant staff at NIH.” Coleman then tells him that they have “directed” him to information that is “relevant for your request” before informing him that “NIAID staff members will not be responding further.” On April 16, Backon writes a follow up email to both Fauci and Coleman that simply reads “Continue to ignore me” and that contains a link to an article out of the Hematology, Transfusion and Cell Therapy journal titled “Hemoglobin value may be decreased in patients with severe coronavirus disease 2019.” A few hours later Fauci responds to Backon writing “You are not being ignored. The National Heart Lung and Blood Institute will take a look at this.” At the end of the day blowing someone off is the same as ignoring them.
Pages 1,324 and 1,325 – On April 13, 2020, Fauci receives an email (at nearly 3AM) from a lawyer named David G. O’Brien with the subject line that reads “Standing Up for Truth.” O’Brien is writing to Fauci “out of deep concern for our nation” and because he apparently puts a lot of stock into what the NY Slimes has to say. O’Brien wrote in part “I am reading reports in The NY Times that President Trump may be considering firing you for telling the truth about the negative consequences of delays in mobilizing the American response to the coronavirus threat. The Times had run articles in recent days detailing the pertinent facts that place the blame for this delay squarely on President Trump. We can reasonably infer that significant loss of life and financial harm resulted from this delay.” After a paragraph about their mission as graduates from Regis High School, O’Brien continues, writing, “The fact that you have consistently and courageously pursued that mission during one of the darkest times in our history explains the extraordinary admiration in which you are held by millions of Americans. You have won their confidence, which has enabled so many to make exquisite sacrifices to win this crucial battle. People will follow heroes, which is precisely how the vast majority views you. I am writing because I want you to know how important you are to America. We cannot lose you and we can not lose the value of truth. Truth must prevail or our precious democracy is in grave peril. Consequently, and I know I speak for the vast majority of Americans whose decency is beyond question, if Donald Trump seeks your removal, please resist for the sake of our nation. An appeal to the populace will not go unanswered. Religious leaders will flock to your defense, as will the media and leading political leaders, including Biden and Cuomo.” This poor bastard. Just look at what the mainstream media has done to him. He thinks Fauci, Biden and Cuomo are the good guys?? Sad! A few days later Fauci responds to him writing, “Many thanks for your kind note. It is much appreciated.” The Twerp is always kind to the Trump-bashers…
Page 1,408 – This page contains a handwritten, March Madness-style bracket titled “Dr. Fauci’s March Madness Bracketology Picks.” The message is from John T. Brooks, an epidemiologist with the Division of HIV/AIDS Prevention, and it is not dated. Assuming Brooks filled out the bracket, he has Coronavirus beating out Ebola and winning it all.
Pages 1,415 and 1,416 – On March 30, 2020, Fauci receives an email forwarded to him from Brian Kelsall, a Senior Investigator at NIAID. Kelsall is sharing an email that was written to him by Sue Edwards, who I believe is a medical ethicist. Edwards wants to know why the CDC has not yet recommended people wear masks while in public – and comes off pretty deranged in the process – asking at one point “wtf is wrong with this country?” Fauci responds almost two weeks later writing, “Thanks, Brian. That recommendation is in the works.”
Page 1,420 – On April 1, 2020, Fauci receives an email from what I gather is a former colleague named Susan Corrigan. Corrigan writes, “Dear Dr. Fauci, I have seen quite a bit of you on television. I live in Miami now. South Florida is the epicenter of the coronavirus. I wish Governor Desantis [sic] would shut down the state of Florida. Thank you from (redacted).” What is with these people wanting to be put under house arrest?
Page 1,439 – On April 12, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a sycophant named Neil Lacey. Lacey is writing to insinuate that the Trump administration is incompetent, and to thank Fauci for “sticking to science and not yielding to politics.” The note is written for The Scarf Lady too, but the other person the email is sent to is redacted in the to/from. Fauci responds later that evening to let him know he appreciated the note.
Page 1,446 – On April 12, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a person named Daniel Kolliker who is writing from Europe. Kolliker urges Fauci to oppose Trump, writing in part, “…don’t let the president keep spreading his lies to the people of the United States.” How about you just worry about you. Okay, Danny-Boy?
Page 1,565 – On April 11, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Fred Upton, a Republican rep from Michigan. Upton is writing to tattle on the Republicans that voted no on a $13B COVID spending bill and to encourage him to “Keep being a science truth teller.”
Pages 1,601 and 1,602 – On April 3, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Karen Becks over at HHS. The subject line reads “Crazy COVID-19 face cover idea” …and she doesn’t disappoint. Becks writes in part, “As I sit here at home and have been thinking about the shortage of medical supplies, doggie cones actually can be used as protection for our health care workers. Just a thought that looks and sounds crazy but can help.” “Looks and sounds crazy” is an understatement to say the least. Let’s all be thankful this never caught on.
Pages 1,646 and 1,647 – On April 3, 2020, Fauci receives an email from yet another sycophant, this one named Marianne Orlando. Orlando is writing to share a drawing she did titled “My Personal Superhero.” The drawing depicts Dr. Fauci as a Superman-like character who is wearing a tight superhero costume and a cape. The accompanying message reads in part, “I dedicated it to you like this: ‘In his own, quiet way, he is a BadAss: Disseminating info about this disease calmly and, always, backed by science.’ …So, Thank you, Sir. You are the voice of reason in what has been a dangerous, frightening situation. You are a real leader.” Can you freaking believe some of these people? Fauci would thank her a few days later.
Page 1,667 – On April 4, 2020, Fauci receives an email from an old acquaintance named Anthony Trocchi. Trocchi is writing to give him some insight into how people feel at the “street level” and to bash the Trump administration. Trocchi writes in part, “You have been the only reasonable voice in the administration. The leadership from the top is utterly lacking and incompetent and dangerous to the American people. You have had a long and venerable career and I am asking you to stand up to power and speak the harsh truth to the people of this country and the without [sic] regard to your personal consequences. We need a unified and professional federal response to this unprecedented crisis. I think you may be the only person of repute and status that has the power to change the course of history.” I would imagine Mr. Trocchi is a regular XiNN viewer or an avid reader of the NY Slimes… or both as he seems to have the leftist talking points down cold like many of the other sycophants that write to Fauci. I wonder what these people think about Biden’s response as many more people have died on his watch than President Trump’s. I’d imagine they’re still blaming Trump.
Pages 1,668 and 1,669 – On April 4, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a man named Stuart Coulter (possibly a D.C.-based physician named John Stuart Coulter). Coulter is writing to inform him about a clinical trial out of China where patients were being given high doses of vitamin C intravenously. He provides Fauci with a bunch of links showing that this treatment is both safe and effective, and points out that the Northwell Hospital Group in NY had already started using this treatment for COVID. Sadly, not only was the use of this treatment never expanded, but once Remdesivir became the “standard of care” treatments like this were all but forbidden from being used. Fauci wrote back a couple of hours later with a standard “we’re looking into it” response. Thinking back, I can’t say I recall The Twerp recommending vitamins and minerals once during the entire duration of the pandemic. I do recall, however, sitting in a Northwell Health doctor’s office in late 2021 and being agitated by a programming loop on the television where every 5-10 minutes I would hear a fluff news interview with a doctor saying he hasn’t heard anything about vitamins and minerals being beneficial in any way to treat or reduce the effects of COVID, and that only the vaccine would help you. After the third time hearing it I asked the nurse behind the glass if I could shut the TV or lower it and thankfully she obliged.
Pages 1,684 and 1,685 – On April 2, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Emilio Emini, a senior advisor at the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and former VP of Vaccine Research and Development at Pfizer. Emini is trying to coordinate the foundation’s global vaccine efforts and figure out a way for he and Fauci to “cross-inform each other’s activities” as Fauci is in control of BARDA’s vaccine funding program. Fauci responds to him the next day and mentions that he had spoken to Bill Gates a day earlier and that he told him he was “enthusiastic about moving towards a collaborative and hopefully synergistic approach to COVID-19 on the part of NIAID/NIH, BARDA and the BMGF.”
Page 1,687 – On April 2, 2020, the Office of the Director of NIAID receives an email from Andrea Lerner that is all but completely redacted. The only thing not hidden is the first line where Lerner writes, “Given our discussion this AM, just thought I would summarize my take on masks across varying scenarios:” Why is a summary on a discussion about masks being hidden? Could it be that they concluded masks are unnecessary for most people? Fauci wrote back later in the day to thank her.
Page 1,746 – On March 29, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a sycophant up in Canada named Nancy Hill with a subject line that reads “You Rock!” Hill follows American mainstream media and as a result is totally clueless about America’s political system and all things COVID. Hill writes in part, “After reading the article about you on the front of the New York Times this morning, I was distressed to learn that you have recently been negatively targeted via social media by members of a certain US political faction. The unfairness of these personal attacks upon you is shocking, and I cannot imagine something so hurtful happening to someone like you who possesses such a depth of knowledge and unimpeachable integrity… I look forward to seeing and hearing more from you on CNN and other media outlets.” The NY Slimes AND XiNN?? No wonder Nancy has no clue what she’s talking about. “[A] certain US political faction”? You mean the Republican party? People like Nancy live in a fake world created by fake news – which is why they view Dr. Fauci as a hero. Would Nancy still feel he has “unimpeachable integrity” after reading The Real Anthony Fauci by Robert Kennedy? It’s probably safe to assume that she would never even give that kind of book a chance as it would cause a serious glitch in The Matrix.
Page 1,761 – On March 28, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a lost soul named Jiaxian Zhou Wu with a subject line that reads “Thank you for your service!” If you thought our friend Nancy Hill was clueless, strap yourself in for this one. Wu writes in part, “This virus, COVID-19, is really dangerous and I am very scared of it. I am really worried about my country, about the countless deaths. Your advice to the president has proven really important to prevent the spread of the disease, however, in this nation, there is another epidemic based on lies and self-interest, now the people behind the fake news are targeting to you, one example is the post of an email that relates to you with the former Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton. This is why I decided to write a letter of support, I am sick of fake news, personal attacks and violation of the First Amendment, the right to have an opinion, to civil servants serving this country. I am still young but I still want to live in a United country. I ask you to continue your job, I want you to know that most Americans regardless of ideology are grateful of your service and sacrifice. A virus does not understand boundaries nor ideology, I am not an expert on this topic nor the president and politicians. Please guide us with the truth in these dire and dark days.” Dire and dark days? I traveled all over the country during the summer of 2020 and it was anything but dire and dark. It was actually one of the best times of my life. Only a fake news junkie who believes they’re reading real information could have a take as bad as Wu’s. I mean this person actually believes that criticizing Fauci is a violation of the First Amendment? Get a clue, Jiaxian. And if you want to live in a united country make sure to never vote for a Democrat as long as you live.
Pages 1,770 through 1,780 – On March 27, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Greg Folkers, Fauci’s Chief of Staff. Folkers is writing to share with him an article in the Washingtonian promoting a new line of “Fauci Swag.” Items include an “I Need a Hero” T-Shirt, Fauci socks, Fauci Fan Club buttons, “Honk For Dr. Fauci” lawn signs, a Fauci prayer candle, a “Fauci 2020” T-Shirt, a “Hope” hoodie, “I ❤ Dr. Fauci” throw pillows, and a “Keep Calm and Wash Your Hands” mug. Any of these items would make a great gift for someone you know that is suffering from a bad case of Stockholm Syndrome. Fauci could only respond with “Geeeez” (you know he loves it though).
Page 1,815 – On March 27, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Senior NIH Investigator Vanessa Hirsch. Hirsch is writing to express her appreciation for Fauci’s “sane voice during the Covid-19 crisis.” I guess it’s okay to be wrong all the time so long as you’re “sane” about it.
Pages 1823 through 1825 – On March 10, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Skip Virgin, the Chief Scientific Officer from Vir Biotechnology. He is writing to Fauci to give him an “update” about something, but unfortunately the entire email is redacted. It isn’t until 17 days later that Fauci forwards the email to John Mascola and asks him to deal with it because it’s “too long” and he has 745 other emails to get to. I guess if it’s not a fawning message from a sycophant it’s hard for Fauci to find the time.
Pages 1,836 and 1,837 – On March 24, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Theodore Friedmann, a Professor from the University of California at San Diego who is noted for his work involving human gene therapy. Friedmann is sharing with him a message he wrote to someone named Jon Cohen about an interview Cohen did with Dr. Fauci. Like many of the other emails The Twerp receives, the message is nothing more than a Trump-bashing fest. Friedmann writes in part, “I have to admit that, until a couple of weeks ago, I have been quite critical of Tony’s apparent acquiescence with so much dangerous, incorrect and politically motivated misinformation from the administration. I feared that the upside-down explanations from the administration had the effect of destroying the concepts and tenets of epidemiology and even rationalizing a completely wrong concept of communicable disease that holds that it is unnecessary to screen for carriers in an epidemic but only important to screen symptomatic people. That is upside-down from what we all know about dealing with epidemics and has even been endorsed by Trump, Pence and other members of the COVID-19 task force. It seems to have become a new normal concept of communicable disease management. Like so many things in the Trump era, facts and history are thrown out the window and replaced by governmentally espoused but obviously wrong concepts… In conversations with colleagues here I wondered ‘where is Tony Fauci?’ They suggested that he must be quietly and heroically working hard being the scenes and at his personal peril to educate our leaders rather than correcting them publicly. But I thought that, in desperate times, the public must hear and see clear truth and denials of lies. My concept of heroes are people who act at their personal peril – Rosa Parks, Martin Luther King, Martin Niemoller, Dietrich Bornhoffer, Thankfully, I think that the real Tony Fauci has emerged, obviously to his peril. I wish him good luck and survival. I find myself wondering what the responses will be to Trump’s likely premature lifting of isolation and quarantining procedures and if the concept of disobeying illegal and unethical orders will survive the times. In any event, good interview! By the way (redacted).” I can only imagine what came after “By the way” considering how whackadoo the rest of the email was. No doubt Ted is a reader of the NY Slimes. It amazes me how people with impressive academic backgrounds can be so influenced by the petty and partisan reporting of the American mainstream media.
Pages 1,837 and 1,838 – These pages contain an email exchange between Jon Cohen and Theodore Freidmann from December of 2018. The exchange starts with Cohen defending an interview he did with George Church saying that he appreciates “his independent, damn the torpedoes approach” and that he “speaks his mind.” The last sentence of the email reads, “As for He, everything about this is bizarre, from ethics to science to PR to regulation.” This is a reference to the He Jiankui Affair, and Friedmann’s response is interesting. Friedmann writes, “Hello Jon – Greetings from (redacted). It has been a long time since we last connected and talked about gene therapy, etc. and (redacted). I was very interested to read George Church’s troublesome responses in your interview with him in Science and to see his ethical evaluation of He’s CCRS editing experiment in China. I’m not as generous to He as George seems to be and I think that this work is clearly unethical. George inexplicably conjures up the sad history of Jess Gelsinger and the effect of his death on the evolution of the field of gene therapy. Happily, he’s right about the fact that gene therapy is now proving itself in a growing list of intractable diseases… That has happened because studies are now much more carefully designed and carried out. But sadly, we are in an environment in which some people conclude that human medical manipulations – gene therapy, genome editing, stem cell therapy – are ethical as long as they ‘work’. The rationale is, ‘let’s do the study and if it works and doesn’t kill or otherwise harm, it’s OK’. It’s not a post-factor evaluation that determines if an instance of human experimentation is ethical and permissible – it is the design of a study that determines if it is ethical or not. George should be reminded of that fact and should re-read the Helsinki declarations or similar codes of human experimentation. In any event, your interview was fascinating. Best regards, Ted Friedmann.” Judging by the difference in tone between this message and the tone of the message in the previous entry, I’m going to assume that Friedmann came down with a nasty case of Trump Derangement Syndrome sometime after that. The takeaway? Reading too much leftist propaganda is bad for your mental health.
Pages 1,840 through 1,842 – On March 25, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Jean-Francois Delfraissy, the Chairman of the National Consultative Ethics Committee in France. After sharing where the country stands in terms of testing, Delfraissy inquires about the use of hydroxychloroquine, writing in part “As you may know, we are currently facing a press buzz since the announcement made by Dr. Raoult about the effectiveness of hydroxy-chloroquine. His data is not particularly convincing. We can distinguish a slight positive signal but it must be confirmed by a well made randomised trial… Also a cohort of severe COVID+ patients have been created and some will be treated with HC: we will analyse those results with all the consciousness needed. It will also be possible to do a prevention trial for healthcare professionals and aging people with HC. I have an enormous political pressure to release HC and to give it to everyone but I am currently resisting… How is the situation in the USA, especially after Trump’s announcement? What is the NIH position? What will be put into force?” Fauci responds by writing in part, “The NIH position is that we should preferably make drugs available on randomized, controlled clinical trials and not freely distribute them. There is a strong push in the USA, favored by the President, to make certain of these drugs more widely available outside of an RCT using mechanisms such as ‘compassionate usage’. In the USA, as you know, HC (plaquenil) is an approved drug for malaria as well as for certain autoimmune diseases such as SLE. Thus, physicians can prescribe the drug on an ‘off label’ usage. This likely will be the major modality of distribution of this drug in the USA, at least for the foreseeable future.” Unfortunately, the foreseeable future saw a concerted media campaign against HCQ take hold, while leftist governors all over the country began restricting the use of HCQ for treating COVID. Nevermind the fact that HCQ has an amazing safety profile and was proven to be effective against SARS in a 2005 study published in the National Library of Medicine titled “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” What changed is that COVID is being used to make drastic reductions to the quality of life throughout the west (“the new normal”). This will only end when the West has become just like China.
Pages 1,856 through 1,858 – Fully redacted.
Pages 1,864 through 1,866 – On March 24, 2020, Fauci receives an email from his Chief of Staff Greg Folkers containing the entirety of a Boston Globe article by Kevin Cullen titled “In order to save Dr. Fauci, we must destroy him.” The article is nuttier than squirrel shit and the product of late-stage Trump Derangement Syndrome. The article reads in part, “Dr. Anthony Fauci is a bum. A quack, a snake oil salesman. He got his degrees online, not from Holy Cross and Cornell. He watches Wheel of Fortune but not Jeopardy. He’s a Yankees fan. Such character assassination is unsavory but necessary because Fauci’s calm, reassuring competence in response to the coronavirus pandemic is placing him at serious risk of hearing the words that made his boss famous: You’re fired. President Trump is watching and listening to the same thing we are, i.e. Fauci going to the podium to rebut with facts the latest outbreak of paranoid anxiety or the president’s regularly reckless statements. Fauci is an oasis of rigor and reason in a barren desert of confusion and fear. Which, given who he works for, makes him an endangered species. During the Vietnam War, some US Army officer supposedly suggested that in order to save a village from the Vietcong they had to destroy it. And so, to save Dr. Fauci, we must destroy him – at least in Trump’s eyes. Now that might sound crazy, but we’re dealing with a crazy president in crazy circumstances. It’s not as if there’s no relevant precedent here. Two words: Bill Bratton. Two other words: Rudy Giuliani. Who happens to be Trump’s BFF. Before Giuliani grew old, deranged, and more qualified to be a spokesman for Miracle Ear than the president’s lawyer, he was the reform-minded mayor of New York City. Rudy rode into Dodge, which is what Times Square resembled at the time, and vowed to clean it up. His hand-picked sheriff was Dorchester’s own Bill Bratton. As police commissioner, Bratton did much to stem violent crime in the nation’s biggest city, but even more remarkably got his cops to reduce the incidence of more minor, so-called quality of life crimes that had made New York less livable, from the tony sections of Manhattan to the Tony Fauci sections of Brooklyn. Bratton did his job too well. He ended up on the cover of Time magazine, hailed as the guy who pulled the worm out of the Big Apple. He became more popular than the mayor. This drove Giuliani nuts. Rudy had to be the smartest guy in the room, had to get all the credit. Sound familiar? So Bratton had to go… The point is, insecure bosses don’t like being shown up by smarter, more competent subordinates. Small men make big mistakes. It may be too late to save Fauci. He just got the star treatment from Maureen Dowd in The New York Times. There used to be a thing called the Sports Illustrated curse, that after an athlete appeared on its cover his or her career tanked. Similarly, being in the Trump administration and getting praised by The New York Times is the kiss of death. Now, normally, you could print something in the Times and chances were the president wouldn’t read it. He routinely dismisses the Gray Old Lady as fake news, except when his and his family’s lousy books are mass-bought onto the newspaper’s bestsellers list. He is not fond of polysyllabic words and prefers to get his news from ‘Fox & Friends’ or whatever white nationalist website his aide Stephen Miller might recommend… We’re way past the theoretical here. Tony Fauci is in real danger, and by extension so are the rest of us who expect – nay, pray for – one person in the White House to be trustworthy and competent in a time of unprecedented crisis. So, again, repeat after me, Dr. Anthony Fauci is a bum. Long live the bum.” Fauci would forward the email to a person who’s email address is redacted several hours later with the message, “Yikes! You have to read this. Things are getting unbelievably crazy.” The problem with Fauci’s reaction, however, is that he contributed greatly to things getting “unbelievably crazy.” Just the tacit approval of all of the derogatory comments made about Trump in these emails contributes greatly to the craziness. And if his documented response to all this Trump-bashing is a shrug of the shoulders, I can only imagine what he sounds like behind closed doors and behind Trump’s back. This type of article is exactly the type of article that Fauci wants written – an article that praises him as the real leader and the elected President as the chump – yet he will publicly play the victim to distance himself from the role he played in creating such politically-charged drivel.
Pages 1,870 and 1,871 – On March 24, 2020, Patricia Conrad receives an email from Washington Compost reporter Yasmeen Abutaleb with a subject line that reads “Washington Post fact check on Fauci/scientists story.” Abutaleb claims that the Compost is working on a “story” about “Trump’s relationship with the scientific and medical experts in the coronavirus response, including Dr. Fauci” but I think she really means “hit piece.” Here are the points that they “would love to discuss”: 1) “Fauci was apoplectic about Trump’s tweet yesterday saying the cure couldn’t be worse than the virus and indicating that he wants to reopen businesses soon,” 2) “Fauci has been forceful privately that unproven drugs should not be advertised to Americans as a panacea (and he of course has publicly spoken about these drugs),” and 3) “We are also reporting in a separate story that Larry Ellison is building a website for the federal government that will collect data on the efficacy of remdesivir, chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine. Our understanding is Fauci is vehemently opposed to this idea and has pushed back on it, citing patient privacy concerns with the website and collecting data in this way outside of an approved FDA trial.” So to review: 1) Fauci’s job is to ensure the government’s response is worse than the virus and to keep businesses closed as long as possible, 2) Fauci’s job is to ensure no one knows about any of the many effective off label drugs that could be used to treat COVID, instead pushing the poison known as Remdesivir which costs $3000/treatment, and 3) Fauci must be in control of all the data to ensure that cheap, effective drugs are never utilized. Sorry, Tony. The cat’s already out of the bag.
Pages 1,891 and 1,892 – On March 23, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a doctor named Barry Albertson. Albertson forwards an email he sent to another doctor named Paul Cieslak about “pooled sampling” along with a short note. And no short note to Dr. Fauci can be written without at least some level of praise and sucking up. Albertson writes in part, “You have no idea how many people tell me that your COVID-19 messages on TV, etc. are top flight, enormously helpful and encouraging for them with the best information, in a sea now of poor information. Andrew Cuomo is also doing a great job informing all of NY (and the rest of us) about what’s going on, and his expectations for the public. Whatever they’re paying you… it’s not enough.” If you think Andrew Cuomo was doing a good job during the pandemic you have no clue about anything. I guess Barry didn’t realize that for a while NYC had the highest COVID death rate IN THE WORLD. But yeah, he was doing a great job. And Fauci is already the highest paid federal employee in the country, not including all the royalties, so how much more does this guy think he should be making?
Page 1,942 – On March 22, 2020, Fauci receives an email from the NY Slimes’ “Science Correspondent” Donald McNeil which contains a link to an article he wrote praising the harsh mitigation tactics used by various countries around the world. The article is titled, “The Virus Can Be Stopped, but Only With Harsh Steps, Experts Say.” In his response, Fauci praises the article as an “an extraordinarily comprehensive, informative and sobering article” and “outstanding.” Propaganda like this article is how the American left became an authoritarian army of COVID Karens being led by Fauci into the abyss.
Page 1,966 – On March 21, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a couple in Vancouver, Canada named Ken and Cathy Glen, and surprise surprise, they’re totally deranged! The email reads in part, “We don’t see social distancing between everyone at the news conferences, and that is disappointing, we also don’t see Donald Trump acquiring the skills and abilities to truly turn over communication and leadership to people such as yourself and your colleagues on the podium. While that is also disappointing, it has come to be expected, therefore easy to tune out. Our Global world needs a Global approach of honesty and transparency, we can’t afford to get this one wrong due to our normal tribal tendencies.” I hate to break it to you guys, but a country like Sweden – which did the opposite of what other EU nations did – fared much better when all was said and done. For example, Sweden suffered 1,805 deaths per million people, while the US had a rate of 2,995 per 1M and the UK had a rate of 2,574 per 1M. In fact, Canada came in lower than all three with a rate of 1,023 per 1M, so why the hell would you want advice from us? The data can be seen here.
Page 1,968 – On March 21, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Donna Parks of the University of Washington’s Medical Education Program. Parks repeats much of the same drivel that most Fauci sycophants pick up through the media, mainly that he is the steady voice of “science and reason.” Parks writes, “I want to thank you and commend you for all you ‘re doing during the COVID -19 pandemic. You are the voice of science and reason – and you seem to be able to get through to President Trump in a subtle way yet with a great deal of integrity. I don’t envy you this gig – particularly with an administration that is so hostile to science, reason, and preparedness on the federal level. I’m still squirming from Trump ‘s latest declarations that hydroxquinolone [sic] could be used for COVID. The more you can explain why this might not be the place to put federal resources right now, the better. Friends of mine are buying it off label in Mexico now, and as a biologist and medical educator I find this alarming.” First off, Trump spoke about hydroxychloroquine, not the drug that Parks mentioned. I’m sure that was not what her friends were buying in Mexico. Second, I’m sure he was given that advice by a medical professional; he didn’t just come up with it on his own. I obtained some HCQ in an “off label” way, and now I have it in case I, or someone I know, ends up needing it. I actually took it for a few days after a friend of mine came down with COVID and I had been around this person. This is nothing to be “alarmed” about. And finally, how exactly was the Trump administration “hostile to science, reason, and preparedness on a federal level”? In addition to taking just about all of Fauci and Birx’s (bad) advice and not following his instincts, Trump procured tens of thousands of ventilators because leftist governors like Andrew Cuomo and Gavin Nuisance were freaking out about not having enough. We now know that 80% of the people put on these ventilators ended up dying and that it was the wrong thing to do. He also had a makeshift hospital set up in NY’s Jacob Javits Center and sent hospital ships to the shores of NY and CA. The ships were never used, and in the case of NY, sick patients were instead sent into nursing homes which led to over 12K needless deaths. I find it quite unsettling that ill-informed partisan twits like Donna Parks are teaching a new generation of doctors how to take orders from on high and not think for themselves.
Page 1,970 – On March 21, 2020, Fauci receives an email from noted gene therapy researcher Theodore Friedmann of the University of California at San Diego. In this email Friedmann took an arrogant and condescending tone as he complained about “the inaccurate and harmful comments coming from our political leaders regarding the COVID-19 pandemic.” In particular, President Trump’s comments about the “claimed effectiveness” of “chloroquine and hydroxychloroquine.” I mean it’s not like there’s an NIH study from 2005 that concluded “Chloroquine is effective in preventing the spread of SARS CoV in cell culture. Favorable inhibition of virus spread was observed when the cells were either treated with chloroquine prior to or after SARS CoV infection.” And it’s not like that study was titled “Chloroquine is a potent inhibitor of SARS coronavirus infection and spread.” It would be crazy to think that. Friedmann basically rants and raves throughout the entire email writing in part, “This announcement [the HCQ plug] and many other untruths were delusional, irrational, unscientific and revealed a profoundly harmful and unethical betrayal by President Trump his responsibility to protect the health of the public that puts the republic in sever danger. I was very glad to hear your public comments that countered this horribly dangerous misinformation… Please continue and even expand your role as the truth teller in the whole crowded collection of muzzled officials and sycophants who seem to be more devoted to deceiving the public rather than preparing the public for hard truths and solving the logistics failures of masks, availability of testing kits. Please continue your brave and essential role as honest broker that you play valiantly privately during your policy discussions that the public also deserves to know about the wrong and unethical self-serving propaganda that the public is fed by President Trump and some other members of the Corona Virus task force. It is a deadly governmental game. I wish you good luck in alerting the public to this immoral, unethical and deadly plague of governmental misinformation designed to shape political quandaries rather than public welfare. Please continue speaking out about public misinformation.” I’m sorry, but Ted Friedmann is an unhinged asshole. Could his rage possibly be due to the fact that if cheap, off label drugs are proven to be effective against COVID then there would be no chance that the experimental gene therapy drugs we are now using would have received an emergency use authorization? That turn of events would have cost many people, which I’m sure include Friedmann, millions of dollars in royalties. People who have ulterior motives often express their true feelings in ways that are indirect so that they don’t expose their true intentions. In any case, this email was not only inappropriate, but totally delusional. Keep reading the NY Slimes, Ted.
Pages 2,003 through 2,009 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Erik Nilsen that is full of information that The Twerp probably doesn’t want to hear. Nilsen is a physicist who had been “modeling the outbreak since January.” He tells Fauci many things including his belief that the Chinese stopped counting COVID deaths in early January of 2020, noting that “They’ve been adding fabricated data daily to show (to save face) the world and their own people an impressive flattening of China outbreak curve. It’s easy to prove this via data analysis because, for example, improbable coincidences occurred in much of the data.” Nilsen claims to have two sources that confirm the claim that the CCP is drastically undercounting their COVID deaths. He also tells Fauci that he doesn’t believe the Chinese did this on purpose and that their actions at this point are more about saving face than anything else. Nilsen then goes on to tell Fauci he has “lots of information” about the US. First he states that many COVID deaths in 2019-20 were incorrectly labeled flu deaths, and that once adequate testing begins the case numbers will be off the charts. Nilsen believes we “missed the containment boat quite a while ago.” He then goes on to tell Fauci that he believes COVID arrived in the US in late November/early December of 2019. The information he provides to support this premise is redacted. Nilsen also said that he has seen information that shows ciclesonide (Alvesco), an inhalable steroid used to treat asthma, brought people back from the brink of death in Japan. He said that in addition to being a suppressor of viral replication, ciclesonide is effective because it “has much smaller particles than other corticosteroids so it reaches deeper into lungs and alveolis [sic].” Nilsen recommended this drug to his friends and family along with hydroxychloroquine, urging them to acquire some to keep on hand in case of emergency. He considers both drugs to be not only effective, but safe. Refreshingly, his last paragraph reads, “I truly appreciated your efforts, and I’m now confident that President Trump, you, and everyone else involved is doing everything possible to ensure the best possible outcomes. I was deeply concerned a few weeks ago, when the gravity of the situation seemed to not be fully recognized by several in DC.” Fauci responds by forwarding the email to Robert Eisinger, a high-ranking NIH employee working in the Office of the Director, with a short message that says, “Too long for me to read.” The email can be read in under five minutes… I would imagine since Nilsen’s email began with criticism of China, who Fauci is in bed with and beholden to, he decided to disregard the rest of the email and just pass the buck. For what it’s worth, I don’t agree with a couple of Nilsen’s points, namely the mislabeling of COVID deaths as flu deaths and his belief that China did not release COVID onto the world on purpose. In both cases I am of the opposite opinion.
Pages 2,013 and 2,014 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives a frantic email from a Florida-based doctor named Doug Brust. Brust is outraged by many things including a lack of PPE and testing kits, and the fact that people are still just going about their lives. He wrote, “On the drive home just now, the gyms, bar-grilles and restaurants still packed. Yes, bars are closed in Florida – but if they serve food (which they all do)……. they’re open. Ans [sic], so much for the 50% capacity ‘suggestion’. The beaches still full for Spring Break. Look at the pics of St Pete.” Oh no! Young healthy college students enjoying themselves, what are we going to do?? Brust then criticizes Florida’s DOH, in particular this pretty reasonable message that was sent out earlier that day: “If a cluster of confirmed cases were to be discovered in Florida, the department would move quickly to engage with and isolate any infected individuals to prevent further spread.” He goes on to write, “I’ve written to our DOH and Governor Desantis [sic] three times (including speaking with his staff) asking to close restaurants (aside from take-out), gyms, beaches etc. They are “monitoring”… I am putting my life on the line so folks can go pump iron, drink beer, have a burger and get a tan. The band is playing on. Again. Please help.” Sounds to me like Dougie-boy is losing his shit. Maybe if safe and effective treatments weren’t being suppressed by the NIH and FDA he wouldn’t feel so helpless.
Page 2,015 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives a very reasonable suggestion from a psychiatrist named Beth Abramson. Abramson asks if isolating vulnerable people and letting those who are less susceptible to COVID go about their lives would not only be less disruptive to society, but an adequate approach to the pandemic. Fauci responds by forwarding it to Andrea Lerner with a note that reads “Please respond to this person.”
Page 2,016 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a doctor named Bruce Wilder. Wilder is concerned that there is a plaquenil (HCQ) shortage due to doctors prescribing it for COVID both as a treatment and a preventative. He said that he had an issue filling a prescription for one of his patients that needs the medicine to treat lupus. This is a very valid concern that could be dealt with through an increase in production, but we already know why that didn’t happen. Fauci responds by forwarding the email to Andrea Lerner with a message that reads “Please respond.”
Page 2,018 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a man named John Brouse. Brouse tells Fauci that doctors in South Korea have been treating COVID patients with hydroxychloroquine and asks if this is something being considered in the US. Little does Brouse know that effective treatments are unacceptable in the US, and that cases and deaths must continue to mount until the experimental gene therapy injections are ready for an emergency use authorization. Fauci responds directly by simply writing “Thank you for your note.”
Pages 2,019 and 2,020 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a “Virginia Resident” named Holly Kreutter. Kreutter feels there is not enough being done with regard to international travel and medical screening upon return to the states. She also urges Fauci to “stem any incorrect information going out from our President, information which gives us hope for a couple of days, and then dashes that and puts many into a frenzied despair.” I would suggest Holly blame the media for the “frenzied despair” and not President Trump. Fauci replied with a “Thank you for your note.”
Page 2,025 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives an email from David Altman, a doctor from Michigan State University. Altman writes in part, “I have done some literature searching on potential treatments for the novel coronavirus and stumbled across a few case case [sic] reports from China in 2005 at the time of the SARS outbreak. They detailed some successes in treatment of severe cases with chloroquine. I saw a more recent study showing hydroxychloroquine had better in vitro efficacy than chloroquine. Have you heard of this? Plaquenil is so innocuous, I wonder if we shouldn’t just try it.” While this is a great suggestion, Fauci responds by writing “Thank you for your note” …which really means “Not gonna happen.”
Page 2,035 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives a highly critical email from a woman named Ann Beloten. Beloten writes, “I am writing to you because I have a question regarding Covid-19. How come you do not tell the complete truth to the American people regarding this virus? All I hear is the bad facts about it. Why not give people some help and tell us the good facts about it? Good facts such as the number of actual patients is very small compared to the whole population, most people who get it make a full and complete recovery. Are you enjoying the senseless panic you made? Panic where people are hoarding food/goods, stealing full shopping carts from the elderly, losing their jobs/wages, inadequate education now that schools are closed. The number of people who will actually be sickened by the virus will be dramatically dwarfed by the people who lose their jobs, receive a poor education despite their teachers best efforts and miss out on once in a lifetime events such as weddings, graduations, communions. What you are doing is not right for the American people!! You need to stop playing GOD and tell the people the complete truth!! The country and the people need to get back to our normal lives NOW!!” I couldn’t agree more, Ann! Fauci would forward the email to Andrea Lerner later that night with no message attached… Probably just so she could also have a good laugh about the damage they’re causing.
Pages 2,043 through 2,045 – On March 18, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Greg Folkers containing the text of a Bloomberg article titled “99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness, Italy Says.” The article presents an overview of an Italian study that analyzed 18% of the country’s COVID deaths. In addition to the findings revealed in the headline, the study found that “that just three victims, or o.8% of the total, had no previous pathology. Almost half of the victims suffered from at least three prior illnesses and about a fourth had either one or two previous conditions. More than 75% had high blood pressure, about 35% had diabetes and a third suffered from heart disease. The average age of those who’ve died from the virus in Italy is 79.5.” Fauci’s only response was “Look at the hypertension percentage.” While noticing that 75% of the Italians that died from COVID had high blood pressure is a good observation, the big takeaway is most people fall into the 99.2% survival rate category.
Pages 2,062 through 2,064 – On March 15 and 16, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a man named Michael Liu. I’m not sure who this individual is, but searching for his identity produced a few interesting results. In any case, the emails read like they could be written by a Chinese plant or spy. On March 15, Liu introduces himself and then immediately begins criticizing CDC guidelines writing, “If a person is mildly sick with COVID-19, the CDC now suggests the person should ‘stay home except to get medical care’, i.e. home-isolation, according to (Liu provides a link to a CDC web page that is no longer being updated). However, the home isolation may result in family spread of COVID-19 in certain kinds of families, e.g., parents are infected but their kids are too young to take care of them, adults are infected but their parents are too old and risky to look after them (if they live together), an old husband/wife is infected but the spouse is too vulnerable to take care of him/her, etc. In such scenarios, the home isolation may increase family spread and even community spread risks in the us. A great method to avoid home-isolation risks is the concentrated isolation, i.e. to isolate mild symptomatic people in a concentrated place instead of their homes [I would have written the last sentence in bold print and underlined it, but Liu already did – all of the other emphasis is mine]. The concentrated isolation can avoid the above family spread risks, provide professional medical help to isolated people, reduce mental pressure of other family members, etc., so that it can reduce community spread risks. Such method has been proved to be effective by China’s war against COVID-19. The concentrated place can be a hotel, university dorm building, etc., which should be easily managed for medical surveillance. The concentration isolation may be voluntarily chosen by relevant families at the beginning, and adjusted to apply subject to different conditions. Hope the above advice helpful [sic]!” …I’ll take the most un-American thing a Chicom agent could say for $1000 please… Isolating “people in a concentrated place instead of their homes” means putting people in concentration camps. Just saying. Is it possible that at this point the Chicoms are not happy with our national response to COVID? Were we not destroying our economy fast enough? Fauci responds to this email with a classic “Thank you for your note.”
Perhaps unsatisfied with Fauci’s lackluster response – after all, this man is taking out time out of his busy life to generously show us the way of the communist Chinese government – Liu follows up the next day with another email and more unsolicited (and bad) advice. Liu wrote, “Dr. Wenhong Zhang, has become very famous in China’s war against COVID-19 because of his great excellence in anti-virus. Dr. Zhang is the Director of the Infectious Disease Department of Huashan Hospital in Shanghai. He is very good according to my observation all long [sic]. Another great doctor in China is Dr. Nanshan Zhong. According to Dr. Zhang’s video at (Liu provides a link), COVID-19 can really be prevented with 3 key measures, i.e. to keep social distancing, wash hands frequently and wear masks. I strongly suggest American people should wear masks like Chinese, South Korean people, etc., because even China’s highest leader, Mr. Jinping Xi, wears masks. If it is difficult for all the US people to do this now, I suggest working staff in airports, supermarkets and other public places should wear masks firstly in order to avoid crossing infection. Further, Dr. Zhang said, if a person is still infected though he/she takes the above 3 measures carefully, the person must be infected by his/her family members. So I propose the concentrated isolation of mild confirmed cases should be considered as I advised yesterday. I strongly suggest American government should learn precious experience of anti-COVID-19 from and cooperate with the mainland China, Taiwan, South Korea with an open mind. If you need any help to contact with Dr. Zhang, I will do what I can. I am very confident that the US government will lead American people to win the anti-COVID-19 war by you and other great experts [also see this]. Science, expertise and great learning are best medicines. God bless you! God bless America, China and the whole world!” What in holy hell is this all about? We literally did all of these things right after they were suggested, presumably, by the Chinese government. Did we not? Fauci responds to this email with much more gusto than the last time writing, “Thank you for your note. We indeed have learned much from our Chinese colleagues. I appreciate your bringing these issues to our attention. Best regards, Tony.”
Pages 2,065 and 2,066 – On March 15, 2020, Fauci and a person whose name is redacted receives an email from Mark Zuckerberg, the Chairman and CEO of Facebook (now called Meta Platforms). Zuckerberg is writing to inform “Tony” about a “Coronavirus information Hub” that they are planning to “put at the top of Facebook for everyone (200+ million Americans, 2.5 billion people worldwide)” to make sure that people get “authoritative information from reliable sources” and to “encourage people to practice social distance and give people ideas for doing this using internet tools.” How noble. He continues, “As a central part of this hub, I think it would be useful to include a video from you because people trust and want to hear from experts rather than just a bunch of agencies and political leaders. This could be done in a number of formats if you’re open to it. Probably best would be recording a Q&A where you answer people’s top questions, but we’d be open to other formats too.” After another paragraph describing some ideas for the new “hub,” the next is fully redacted with the exception of “Finally[.]” Zuckerberg closes the email by thanking Fauci and providing his cell phone number stating “If it’s easy to talk live, give me a call anytime on my mobile phone…” The next day Fauci and a person whose name is redacted receive an email from Courtney Billet. There are few other names redacted in the list of people Cc’d. Billet is writing for an immediate response to Zuckerberg’s offer to produce some videos because they “would have the weight and impact of television – really, more so.” She continues, “But an even bigger deal is his offer (redacted).” I don’t know about you, but I’d sure like to know what the “bigger deal” is. Fauci would finally reply to Billet on the 17th, stating, “I will write to or call Mark and tell him that I am interested in doing this…”
Page 2,077 – On March 16, 2020, Fauci receives yet another email recommending the use of hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID, this time from Robert Roth, a (redacted) assistant attorney general of the States of New York and Oregon. Roth includes an article written by Paul Craig Roberts, the former Assistant Secretary of the US Treasury under President Reagan, and a link to a study regarding the use of HCQ for COVID. Fauci forwards the email to Cristina Cassetti late that night instructing her to “Please respond.” The Twerp is sure as hell not going to take advice from Paul Craig Roberts.
Page 2,114 – On March 16, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a “California resident” named Victoria Baron. Baron just wanted to thank him for his “professionalism and integrity” during the pandemic… and to criticize President Trump, of course. She goes on to write, “It is so evidently clear that you are forced to work ‘around’ the ignorance, ineptness and narcissism of Donald Trump, yet you continue to provide the country with the truth. I’m guessing that the odds of you actually seeing this email might be slim but l feel better for having sent it. You will be remembered as a hero during a very dark time.” What’s with all these people referring to the pandemic as a dark time? Fauci responds to the Trump-bashing less than three minutes later by writing, “Victoria, I saw it and thanks for sending it. Best regards, Tony.”
Page 2,121 – On March 16, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a woman named Alicia Jewell, who is writing on behalf of the “dental community.” Jewell is very alarmed by the level of risk those in her field are facing daily writing, “For 8-12 hours a day we are creating aerosols while sitting 8-12 inches from a persons [sic] open mouth. These aerosols contain saliva and blood droplets, along with billions of other bacteria and materials. In dentistry, saliva is considered a blood borne pathogen. Although OSHA requires Level 3 masks for all aerosol producing procedures, not all offices are complying. This DOES NOT matter anyway as we know SURGICAL MASKS DO NOT FILTER OUT THE COVID-19 virus. I ask that you suspend non essential dental procedures such as dental cleanings and other procedures that are non-emergent. That we triage patients and accept EMERGENCIES ONLY. We are at such a HIGH risk, not only to ourselves and our families, but a HIGH RISK to spreading this virus COMMUNITY wide. Many of us are taking extra precautions but screening patients, but with a up-to-14 day incubation period, that obviously does not matter. Please hear our plea to address our concerns. The American Dental Association and the American Dental Hygienists Association has failed us.” The suspension of non-essential dental procedures would eventually begin in some places around the country, and I can remember reading a few horror stories about people being prescribed antibiotics to deal with an abscess because they couldn’t get in to see a dentist without traveling long distances. This is what undue fear does. Jewell doesn’t seem to understand that in addition to asymptomatic people never being spreaders of COVID, just being around an open mouth doesn’t mean you are going to catch something. A person has to have symptomatic COVID in order to spread it, so the simple screenings they were doing more than sufficed. Fauci responded about 15 minutes later by forwarding the email to Andrea Lerner with the message “Respond.”
Page 2,130 – On March 15, 2020, Fauci receives an email from another Ph.D, this one by the name of Emory A. Ford (who could be this person, though I’m not sure). Like all the other intellectuals who have reached out to Dr. Fauci, Ford thanked him, writing “You are doing a great job and a great service to the country. Amid the chaos you are one of few voices that provides clear, accurate information on the coronavirus pandemic.” This person then goes on to bash Trump by writing, “Please continue providing that service despite the presidents [sic] continued effort(s) to spin the situation with misleading and false information.” I notice a lot of these supposed geniuses, in addition to being loyal followers of fake news, have terrible grammar, and Ford is no exception to either. Fauci responded about 20 minutes later writing, “Emory: Thank you for your kind note. It is much appreciated. Best regards, Tony.” …more tacit approval for the criticism of our president.
Pages 2,133 and 2,134 – On March 15, 2020, Fauci receives a somewhat frantic email from someone named Lei Harrison. Harrison was a “former” something, but that was redacted. He tells Fauci that he has been “calm until now” before laying out eight mitigation measures that he feels the US should take immediately. Harrison’s first suggestion is that we should “Shut down the country NOW. Mobility has to be as low as possible. We have to do the very best RIGHT NOW to break the transmission chain.” He also suggests Fauci speak with a doctor named Zong Nanshan, because his advice “would be of tremendous value for the U.S. now,” and that “People need to realize that we are entering war time.” Other suggestions include: making sure the supply chain from China is uninterrupted, planning ahead by preparing people to treat themselves at home, and that all “Garbage and belongs [sic] and bodies” be burned as a precaution. Harrison concludes the email by writing, “Dr. Fauci. Clock is ticking. It’s a race against time. And it’s time that every single American takes responsibility. Please lead us through the crisis.” How would doing everything this guy says be “leading”? Fauci responds from his phone less than three minutes later with “Thank you for your note.”
Page 2,139 – On March 15, 2020, Fauci receives an email from someone named P. Salimi suggesting we start using UV light to disinfect “hospitals, Health centers, stores, supermarkets, elevators, public lavatory, toilets, restrooms and other public places” 24 hours a day, seven days a week. Fauci responds from his phone several hours later with “Thank you for your note.” Though the “@_______” section of Salimi’s email address is redacted, the part that is visible is “ABCDE FGHIJK,” which is a little weird.
Pages 2,161 through 2,164 – On March 15, 2020, Fauci again exchanges emails with CBS Chief Medical News Correspondent Jon LaPuke. LaPuke is asking The Twerp to look over an article he wrote before posting it “widely.” One section of the article in particular did not age well, it reads, “Take a look at this illustration. It appeared in the Economist and is based on a CDC report. The blue curve shows what happens when you do nothing. The number of infections peaks relatively quickly. This can overwhelm a healthcare system that is not prepared to handle such a huge number of patients. Emergency rooms and hospitals can become overloaded. We may see shortages of medical supplies – including protective gear and breathing machines – and shortages of healthcare workers, especially if many of them become infected. But look at the yellow curve. It shows what can happen when you slow the epidemic. The outbreak is stretched out. And while it may last longer, the peak number of infections is much lower, putting less stress on the healthcare system and allowing better care for each patient. It also gives scientists more time to develop new treatments and vaccines.” This article is nothing more than pro-lockdown propaganda. As we have seen by how things played out in Sweden versus the US or Great Britain, the opposite of what LaPuke writes here is what actually occurred. Despite telling LaPuke that his drivel article “looks quite good,” Fauci actually replies with a good suggestion for once writing, “I suggest that you lean out there and explicitly say that the elderly and certainly those with underlying conditions should voluntarily self-isolate now.” LaPuke then seeks clarification about what age can be considered “elderly” and about underlying conditions writing, “And for underlying conditions, should I say ‘serious underlying conditions’ or leave it vague at ‘underlying medical conditions?’ I think the more specific the better.” Fauci responds about seven minutes later with, “I would not use an age number, but if you had to I would say 70. I would say ‘serious’ underlying condition.” Now if I never took the time to read 3,000+ pages of Fauci’s emails I would have continued to believe that he provided the general public with no good advice at all for the entire duration of the pandemic. Silly me.
Pages 2,167 and 2,168 – On March 15, 2020, Fauci receives a pretty lengthy email from a past colleague named David Landrigan. Landrigan is writing to offer some common sense advice about herd immunity and what the best approach would be for the lockdown. He writes in part, “Your ‘close the bars’ statement is right on target with what I was writing when I heard you say it. It was a great illustration counterintuitive to what will work. You could have more correctly said keep the bars open only to those in their twenties and thirties. Five minutes later Mayor DeBlasio said everything is on the table including closing bars and restaurants! Below you will see me argue why there are better approaches and this total closure approach is the wrong move. Selective participation will work in our favor to blunt the curve! Total closure will not work and can work against us! …There is a need to closely consider how available tools are being used to mitigate an overwhelming of the healthcare system. I can tell you now that what needs to be done isn’t being done and that the road we are on now will at most postpone crossing the threshold of 100% capacity. It will not achieve the desired result of distributing cases over a greater time period so that being overwhelmed is avoided… The second point to consider is whether we can move the US toward HIT [Herd Immunity Threshold] by age selective application of available measures. The answer is yes and this could provide the best tool. Susceptibility and strengths of covid-19 infections covary with age. People less than 30 rarely have severe infections and the younger ones may not become infected. People under 40 show a low frequency of severe infection. It will be important to know if there is a large age cohort exempt from infection because that would undermine part of the result from selective application of measures or limit the sampling age because these people wouldn’t develop immunity, but might contribute to delaying herd effects. If they develop immunity their contribution can be substantial and they can be kept separated from more vulnerable people until and unless it is established that there isn’t a need. Opening night clubs, sporting events, restaurants, and other places to people in their twenties and thirties will build immunities, break infection transmission links, and move toward HIT with little or no risk to the people or the rest of the herd. Have admission to the venues by existing ID, like a driver’s license with age, and have agreement that they do not mingle with vulnerable older people. Leaving the bars open to people in their 20’s and 30’s will flatten the curve!” Fauci responds to Landrigan’s suggestions the same way he does with all of the good suggestions he receives… he passes the email off to someone else, in this case Robert Eisinger, instructing him to “Please handle” – which to me means “Tell this guy in a nice way to buzz off.”
Page 2,210 – On March 14, 2020, Fauci receives an email from an unknown person using very poor grammar who calls Fauci out for being the Big Pharma shill that he is. The unknown person writes, “Dr. Fauci; In germany they found the drug camostat mesilate they used on SARS in 2003 kills the coronavirus in a petri dish. why wouldn’t you give it a try? Will drug companies lose too much monies [sic]? Makes sense to use an already approved drug with little side effects. God is watching !!!!!!!!!!!!!” Fauci sent the email to Cristina Cassetti with no instructions.
Pages 2,212 and 2,213 – On March 14, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a person named Mike Betts (whose job title is redacted) about how poorly the US is handling the pandemic. Betts writes in part, “…It seems to me that trying to contain the virus as we are doing at present will be futile. Since the virus can be present for many days without a person having any symptoms, you would literally need to test everyone at the same time to determine who has it – an impossible task. I have a different thought. We know that the virus is especially dangerous for the old and/or immunosuppressed. IMO we should be focusing all of our efforts on keeping that group from becoming infected. To do so that group should be encouraged to self-isolate, to limit their social interactions and other groups should be instructed to avoid them. Sort of a reverse-quarantine idea… The problem right now is that the media has created a panic. Last night my wife and I went to the local Whole Foods and many of the shelves were empty and healthy younger people were wearing masks. The message is not getting out that the virus is almost solely dangerous to the elderly and immunosuppressed. [Why aren’t the demographics being released? That in itself could calm many people]… Quarantining otherwise healthy people outside of those groups who finally demonstrate symptoms – like the NBA players – is ridiculous. They are likely to get the sniffles and have also already spread the virus. As long as they’re not spreading it to the endangered group we should not worry about it. In sum, we need to isolate the vulnerable and realize that the mortality rate for people outside of that group is likely lower than the flu… But sending home workers who have next to no likelihood of being significantly impacted by this virus is ridiculous. The virus hits hardest the old and infirm, two groups that are most likely NOT to even be in the workforce! To me, this solution is a lot simpler than what is being tried right now and is much more likely of success. To everyone besides the endangered group this virus is literally less dangerous than the flu. There is no reason that anyone outside of the endangered group should have any concern at all and we need to make that clear. Please let me know what you think.” What Betts doesn’t realize is that all of these “ridiculous” measures are being taken on purpose to wreck the economy, to bankrupt people and make them desperate, and to usher in the Great Reset by “building back better” on the ashes of a once-thriving society. A few hours later, Fauci responds to Betts from his phone with one of his classic “Thank you for your note” responses. You see, The Twerp doesn’t need to answer to anyone about anything. He calls all the shots.
Page 2,216 – On March 14, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a couple of sycophants named Celia and Jim Lewis. The short email opens with “My husband and I are both (redacted) so we’ve followed a lot of TV news regarding COVID-19.” Why is their occupation redacted? The couple goes on to praise him for his “‘no BS’ presentation of the realities” of COVID writing, “We hear the politicians and the news anchors, but we find our comfort in the unwavering truth you deliver through the lens of your decades of experience and expertise. And we thank you, more than you know.” Pathetic.
Page 2,260 – On March 12, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a lemming doctor named Robert Boyd Tober. Tober seems pretty freaked out about how the state of Florida is handling the virus stating, “There is conflict between what our Florida governor states and what CDC states” – as if that’s a bad thing. He goes on to write, “If indeed there is community spread happening, I and many others are sitting ducks. It is not if but when!! Thanks for any guidance you might be able to provide.” Here’s some guidance, Bob: Turn off the television, ignore everything Dr. Fauci and the CDC tell us, and calm the @#?! down. The Twerp forwarded the email to Andrea Lerner with the message “Check this out and get back to me. Not sure what he is talking about.” What he’s talking about is that he’s become hysterical largely because of you…
Page 2,401 – On March 6, 2020, Kristian Andersen sends an email to Dr. Fauci, Jeremy Farrar, and Francis Collins informing them about an article he wrote and that will soon be published in Nature Medicine. The email reads, “Dear Jeremy, Tony, and Francis, Thank you again for your advice and leadership as we have been working through the SARS-CoV-2 ‘origins’ paper. We’re happy to say that the paper was just accepted by Nature Medicine and should be published shortly (not quite sure when). To keep you in the loop, I just wanted to share the accepted version with you, as well as a draft press release. We’re still waiting for proofs, so please let me know if you have any comments, suggestions, or questions about the paper or the press release. Tony, thank you for your straight talk on CNN last night – it’s being noticed. Best, Kristian.” I find it more than a little curious that the word “origins” is in quotation marks. As you will soon learn when you get to the entry for pages 3,187 through 3,193, Andersen spoke about the virus being “engineered” pretty candidly in an email written on January 31, 2020 and was likely set straight by Fauci and others in the days that followed. Just six sentences into the article he helped write for Nature Medicine, Andersen and his colleagues state, “Our analyses clearly show that SARS-CoV-2 is not a laboratory construct or a purposefully manipulated virus.” How convenient. Fauci responds to Andersen two days later writing “Kristian: Thanks for your note. Nice job on the paper. Tony.”
Page 2,723 – On February 14, 2020, Fauci receives an email from a man named Richard Allen Johnson (who could be this person) criticizing the WHO. Johnson writes, “I am very distressed by the Face of the WHO. Their public face, their news updates, are of the quality of those of a third world country. I only hope that they function better than their news updates suggest. They need a world class public relations firm. I am deeply concerned re Covid-19 in India (with a population of 1500 million) and Africa (population 100 million). News reports do not mention anything of this pandemic waiting to happen.” Funny, I never saw a follow-up email from Johnson about how places in India were able to crush the virus using ivermectin or how the widespread use of ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine on the continent of Africa stopped a widespread pandemic from breaking out at all in most of the countries there. Fauci responds by writing, “Dick: Thanks for the note. I certainly appreciate your concerns about WHO.”
Pages 2,786 through 2,788 – On January 25, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Dr. Martin J. Blaser, Professor and Chair of the Human Microbiome at Rutgers University (with two scientific papers attached). Blaser is writing to help The Twerp out “in a small way” (no pun intended – I think). After starting the email off with some technical talk, which I believe is about reactive oxygen levels and patients catching COVID while receiving treatment for something else, Blaser suggests keeping COVID patients in isolation and even using robots to treat people if and when possible. He then tells Fauci that while “draconian,” China is handling the pandemic the right way, and that closing schools to stop transmission may become an important step in fighting the virus. This doesn’t sound like the kind of guy that the federal government should be taking advice from… Fauci responds the next day by writing, “Many thanks. This is very helpful.”
Pages 2,832 and 2,833 – On February 9, 2020, Fauci receives an email from his Chief of Staff Greg Folkers. Folkers is writing to share information about the University of Alabama at Birmingham using Remdesivir to treat COVID patients in the US and China, and that the research (supposedly) “found [Remdesivir] to have significant activity against the 2019-nCoV strain when the outbreak began in the Chinese city of Wuhan.” Fauci responds later that evening by writing, “WOW! I did not know that. Good talking point for press conferences.” Despite what Fauci might think, the citizens of this country never needed “good talking points,” only sound data and reliable therapeutics… and we got neither.
Page 2,940 – On February 5, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Dr. Robert L. Knobler (who I’m pretty sure is this guy, though his titles are redacted) who is writing to suck up a little bit and offer his assistance. The only thing of note is what is written in the subject line of the email, which reads, “Potential Approach to Wuhan Coronavirus.” How racist and insensitive. Doctor Knobler should be canceled immediately.
Page 2,941 – On February 4, 2020, Fauci receives an email from XiNN’s Senior Medical Correspondent Elizabeth Cohen. Cohen is writing to inquire about whether or not there are “any particular protocols being suggested for treating the Wuhan coronavirus cases in the US.” Ouch. Looks like Cohen is another one of these hateful, insensitive bigots. She should now be fired and have her life completely destroyed. Seriously though, I find it funny… or maybe ironic… or maybe just pathetic that in about a month’s time Trump referring to where the virus came from will cause the heads of leftist losers throughout the mainstream media, XiNN included, to start exploding.
Pages 2,944 and 2,945 – On February 5, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Dr. Robert Levitt. Levitt is writing to share what he thinks are “the most important facts in the report for Secretary Azar and other federal officials who must stop the spread of 2019-nCoV in the U.S. by identifying all infected persons and their contacts” – and to share some “personal thoughts” on how to get that done. The first “important fact” he lists reads, “President Trump signed an order preventing entry into the U.S. of any person who has traveled to mainland China (PRC). Exceptions include U.S. citizens and permanent residents and their families. Thank you Mr. Trump.” Things might have been different for us, and really the entire world, if President Trump was relying more on people like Dr. Levitt and less on people like The Twerp and The Scarf Lady.
Pages 2,946 and 2,947 – On February 5, 2020, Fauci receives an email from someone (who is likely this doctor from the University of Toronto) named Tak Mak with the subject line reading “An Idea.” Unfortunately, the entire email is redacted aside from the first line that reads, “It has been a while since we discussed science.” It must have been a really great idea considering the general public isn’t allowed to see it. Fauci responds by writing, “Tak: Thanks for the note. It likely will be more efficient if I refer you to the program people in my Institute who could go over these data with you and then get me involved later. The reason that is that [sic] I am doing 18 hours pe [sic] day (seriously) as part of the White House Task Force and it would very [sic] difficult for me to fit in a meeting to go over data. I have copied Dr. Cristina Cassetti who runs our coronavirus extramural research program. I will ask her by this e-mail [sic] to contact you to have our people discuss your work with you.” 18 hours a day doing what exactly? TV spots?
Page 3,024 – On February 4, 2020, Fauci receives an email from John Howard, President of the Applied Biotechnology Institute. The email begins, “Dear Dr, [sic] Fauchi, [sic] I understand you are leading an effort on the Wuhan Coronavirus. I am writing to enquire how we may help in this effort….” The rest of the email is redacted, but we already have all we need to know about Mr. Howard, don’t we? And that is the fact he is obviously a hateful racist who should be fired immediately and have his career ruined. Wuhan coronavirus?? The nerve! Fauci would forward the email to his hatchetwoman Cristina Cassetti the next day along with the message “Please handle.” I’m sure the misspelling of his name pissed him off, too… which made me chuckle a bit.
Pages 3,065 and 3,066 – On February 4, 2020, Fauci receives an email at 2:07AM from someone whose name and email address are redacted. The email reads, “As you realized the Indian researcher published a paper few days ago [sic] entitled ‘Uncanny similarity of unique inserts in the 2019-nCoV spike protein to HIV-I. gp120 and Gag’, which was latterly [sic] withdrawn due to the controversial indication. I did a quick SWISS-MODEL online calculation. Page 1-3 of the attachment show the flexible loops of insertion ‘1’, ‘2’, and ‘3’ originally from V4, V5 and Vl of HIV-1 gp120, respectively. But they are in presence on the spike protein of both bat and 2019 coronavirus (page 4 and 6). These insertions are potential CD4 binding domains (no proof yet but highly likely) and spatially won’t interfere with ACE-2 binding domain (both SARS and 2019 coronavirus target ACE-2, page 5 and 6). In another word, the 2019 virus could be potentially dual-targeting, infecting the lung and potentially CD4 T cells too (like HIV, see page 6)! It is VERY URGENT to have clinicians follow up the confirmed cases such as by isolating their CD4 cells and doing RT-PCR. Please reach out to them. Research labs including mine after obtaining Spike protein of 2019-nCoV shall examine its interaction with CD4. Thank you for your immediate attention. Please keep me anonymous.” After reading this email a few questions came to mind. First, why is a paper that shows genetic inserts similar to the HIV virus being withdrawn “due to the controversial indication”? Second, what’s the indication? That the virus was created in a lab, and by showing these HIV inserts it would become obvious to everyone this was the case? And third, why does this person want to remain anonymous? Is he an operative who is reporting back to Fauci to let him know that people are on to the fact that the virus looks engineered, and that HIV “inserts” might have been used in its creation? Sure looks that way to me. Fauci responds about 12 hours later by forwarding the email to Cristina Cassetti with the message “Please have someone respond to this person.”
Pages 3,125 through 3,135 – On February 1st and 2nd, 2020, a chain of heavily redacted emails are sent between members of a February 1st conference call, the call where I believe these individuals figured out a way to make the suspicions of COVID leaking from the Wuhan lab go away. Please take note that Dr. Fauci may have been the only US government “official” on the call. Francis Collins and Lawrence Tabak were Cc’d on a couple of the emails, and while I believe Collins could possibly have participated, I do not believe Tabak did based on the following communications. The other people who participated did so from five different time zones (Sydney, CET, GMT, EST and PST) and include, but are not limited to: Kristian Anderson, Bob Garry, Christian Drosten, Mike Ferguson, Ron Fouchier, Eddie Holmes, Josie Golding, Marion Koopmans, Stefan Pohlmann, Andrew Rambaut, Paul Schreier, Jeremy Farrar, Michael “FMedSci” and Patrick Vallance. I say “not limited to” because some of the names Cc’d on these emails are redacted – though the ones still visible are included on a list of conference call attendees written in an email by Jeremy Farrar to the call group on February 1st (page 3,135) – which is where the email chain begins… So let’s start there.
The subject line of that email reads “Teleconference” and it reads in part, “1st February (2nd Feb for Eddie)[.] Information and discussion is shared in total confidence and not to be shared until agreement on next steps. Dial in details attached. Please mute phones. I will be on email throughout – email Paul or I Paul [sic] if any problems[.] If you cannot make it, I will phone you afterwards to update. One Hour[.]” Farrar is the head of a leftist British organization called Wellcome Trust. They fund a lot of different research projects and can be compared to EcoHealth Alliance – the outfit run by Peter Daszak that we know funded gain-of-function research at the Wuhan lab by serving as a go-between for the lab and the NIH. I assume because Farrar seems to be knee-deep in all this, Wellcome Trust was also involved in the research going on at the lab in Wuhan. Later that night, around 10PM (wherever he was emailing from – the service provider is German), Farrar writes another email to the group that reads, “Thank you to everyone for joining. There is clearly much to understand understand [sic] in this. This call was very helpful to hear some of our current understanding and the many gaps in our knowledge… (large redaction)… I hope that is a reasonable approach, please send any thoughts or suggestions. Once again, thank you for making time over a weekend and for such an informed discussion on a complex issue.” While I’m sure a lot of juicy nuggets of information are contained in the redacted text, we may never truly know for sure.
**Interestingly, another email written by Farrar that appears to be part of this series of emails can be found on page 3,172. On February 1, 2020 at 2:56PM, Farrar writes to Fauci, Collins, Ferguson and Vallance asking “Can I suggest we shut down the call and then redial in? Just for 5-10 mins?” Fauci responds (presumably from another time zone) at 8:03PM with “Yes[.]” What did they talk about after they “redial in” and why did they not want the rest of the people on the call to hear what they said?
Side note: I’m sure you have noticed that while the page numbers (until this insertion) are sequential, the dates of the emails are not. In addition to this, there are many duplicate emails contained in the document. Were these things done intentionally to create obstacles for those who would eventually read them? Not only did including the duplicates increase the length – though the number of pages was likely already too long for many to find the time to go through – but the non-sequential release of the emails makes it more difficult to put pieces together and create a bigger picture.**
On February 2, 2020 at 4:48AM, Farrar again emails the group, this time writing, “This is a very complex issue. I will: (large redaction)… I suggest we don’t get into a further scientific discussion here, but wait for that group to be established. Jeremy.” I’m not sure how “scientific” this discussion was, but it’s clear that Farrar felt uncomfortable communicating in a way that creates a paper trail.
On February 2, 2020 at 8:30 (presumably in the AM), Ron Fouchier writes an email to the group that reads, “Dear Jeremy and others, This was a very useful teleconference… (large redaction)… Thanks for organizing this on such short notice[.] Kind regards[,] Ron.” The note is followed by a large piece of writing titled “Ron’s notes,” but unfortunately what amounts to more than two full pages is completely redacted. Ten minutes later, Andrew Rambaut responds to Founchier’s email by writing, “Dear Jeremey [sic], Ron and all, Thanks for inviting me on the call yesterday… (very large redaction)… Best, Andrew.” Nah, this doesn’t seem like a cover-up at all.
On February 2, 2020 at 10:27 (presumably in the AM), Francis Collins responds to Jeremy Farrar (and Cc’s Fauci and Tabak) writing, “Jeremy, (large redaction)… I’m available any time today except 3:15-5:45 pm EST (on a plane) for a call to Tedros. Let me know if I can help get through his thicket of protectors. Francis.” Who are these protectors and what are they protecting?
On February 2, 2020 at 6:53AM, Farrar responds to Collins by writing, “Thank you[.] See thoughts overnight from others… (large redaction)… Jeremy.” This is followed by another very large redaction that is about a page in length.
On February 2, 2020 at 12:03 (presumably in the PM), Collins again responds to Farrar (and again Cc’s Fauci and Tabak) writing, “Hi Jeremy, Thanks for forwarding these additional reflections from Mike and Bob… (redaction)… Francis.”
On February 2, 2020 at 7:13AM, Farrar again responds to Collins (with Fauci and Tabak Cc’d) writing, “….Really appreciate us thinking through the options… (redacted).
On February 2, 2020 at 3:30PM, Fauci finally responds to Farrar and Collins (with Tabak Cc’d) writing, “Jeremy: Sorry that I took so long to weigh in on your e-mails [sic] with Francis and me. I was on conference calls… (redacted)… Best regards, Tony.”
On February 2, 2020 at 11:28AM, Farrar sends another email to Fauci, Collins and Tabak that reads, “Tedros and Bernhard have apparently gone into conclave [another way to say private meeting]…. they need to decide today in my view. If they do prevaricate, I would appreciate a call with you later tonight or tomorrow to think how we might take forward. Meanwhile….
I love that he includes a link to a ZeroHedge article in this email because it says two things: 1) ZeroHedge is a respectable source of information that has a wide audience, and 2) it helps to show that they’re getting nervous about word getting out about COVID being created in a lab and begin speeding up the timeline of their cover-up… Hence the urgency to get Tedros dependably on board. Notice how Farrar mentions how they will have to rethink how to move forward on their own if Tedros does not go along with what they want to do. Unfortunately, the linked ZeroHedge article, as well as many others in this timeline, have been archived and can only be accessed through subscription.
Finally on February 2, 2020 at 4:49PM, Fauci sends Collins a brief email that reads, “Francis: Do you have a minute for a quick call? Tony.” I’m sure he made the time…
The takeaway: Think about how much we still don’t know after reading these emails – emails that were released via Freedom of Information Act requests… Freedom of information my ass. Because the redacted portions of these emails accounted for more than half of the total length of the 11 pages (3,125 through 3,135 plus page 3,172), there is still so much more to learn about what was in these email communications, as well as the origins of the Wuhan Red Death.
Pages 3,187 through 3,193 – On January 31, 2020, Fauci sends an email to Jeremy Farrar and Kristian Andersen at 6:47PM containing the full text of an article from Science Magazine by Jon Cohen titled, “Mining coronavirus genomes for clues to the outbreak’s origins.” Along with the article’s text, Fauci sent a message that reads, “Jeremy/Kristian: This just came out today. You may have seen it. If not, it is of interest to the current discussion.” According to the email, the article appears to have been published at 6:20PM, just 27 minutes before Fauci felt the need to make Farrar and Andersen aware of it. Fauci receives a reply from Andersen later that night at 10:32PM stating, “Hi Tony, Thanks for sharing. Yes, I saw this earlier today and both Eddie [Holmes] and myself are actually quoted in it. It’s a great article, but the problem is that our phylogenetic analyses aren’t able to answer whether the sequences are unusual at individual residues, except if they are completely off. On a phylogenetic tree the virus looks totally normal and the close clustering with bats suggest that bats serve as the reservoir. The unusual features of the virus make up a really small part of the genome (<0.1%) so one has to look really closely at all the sequences to see that some of the features (potentially) look engineered. We have a good team lined up to look very critically at this, so we should know much more at the end of the weekend. I should mention that after discussions earlier today, Eddie, Bob, Mike, and myself all find the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory. But we have to look at this much more closely and there are still further analyses to be done, so those opinions could still change. Best, Kristian.” Judging from this email it would seem that Andersen is unaware that a cover-up is about to ensue as he speaks openly about the the virus looking “potentially” engineered, as well as the fact that he and the colleagues he spoke with found “the genome inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory” – or in other words – engineered. Around 6:45PM the next day Fauci replies to Andersen with a short message that reads, “Thanks, Kristian. Talk soon on the call.” I’d love to know what was said during that call. I’m sure Fauci had plenty to say to Andersen about his casual mention of the virus looking engineered through a government email account. Oddly, Fauci’s Chief of Staff Greg Folkers appears in the middle of the exchanged emails at 8:43PM, but there is no “To” line that normally appears with the “From,” Sent,” and “Subject” lines, so it’s unclear what Folkers sent or who he sent it to. My best guess is that he is the one that put the contents of the article into the email that went to Farrar and Andersen because Fauci did not know how to do it himself, but that’s just a guess. The same email also appears on page 3,229.
On an interesting side note, Ohio Rep. Jim Jordan made an important observation during a congressional hearing (a longer version/backup can be seen here) that took place June 29th, 2021 on the origin of COVID… A few days after Andersen told Fauci in an email that “the genome [is] inconsistent with expectations from evolutionary theory” he had a sudden change of heart and referred to the belief that the virus was engineered as “crackpot nonsense” – though I’m not sure where Jordan pulled that quote from. People like Andersen can get away with this type of flip-flopping because of the army of “fact-checkers” waiting in the wings to back up their nonsensical claims, even if they later change their tune when it becomes safe to do so (by “do so” I mean tell the truth). In any event, it’s clear something changed for Andersen after that February 1st call… Even more revealing is the fact that on August 27th, 2020, Andersen received nearly $2M in a CREID grant from the NIH. This is what corrupt science looks like.
Pages 3,210 – On February 1, 2020, Fauci sends an email to Lawrence Tabak, who at the time was the Acting Director of the National Institute of Dental and Craniofacial Research, simply stating “Here it is” with a subject line that reads, “FW: IMPORTANT.” Attached to the email is a pdf document described as “Baric, Shi et al – Nature medicine – SARS Gain of function.pdf.” Baric and Shi refer to Dr. Ralph Baric from the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill and Shi Zhengli from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The two had been collaborating on gain-of-function research back in 2014-15 when a pause had been put on conducting those types of experiments in the United States. In 2015, they published a study together (also with other scientists) titled “A SARS-like cluster of circulating bat coronaviruses shows potential for human emergence” (the entry I wrote about the study is dated November 9, 2015). Dr. Fauci has denied time and time again that the NIH has been involved in any gain-of-function research at all while testifying in front of congressional committees. At one point he even went so far as to deny – after they were specifically named (see July 20th, 2021) – that Baric and Shi were not conducting this type of research despite the fact that the first line of the “Acknowledgements” section of the linked study reads, “Research in this manuscript was supported by grants from the National Institute of Allergy & Infectious Disease…” – the agency run by Fauci for the last four decades. While the subject line of this email is something that can be easily overlooked, it strongly indicates Fauci perjured himself repeatedly when denying accusations that the NIH was funding dangerous research at UNC Chapel Hill and the Wuhan lab. On December 19, 2021 Lawrence Tabak took over as the Director of the National Institutes of Health. You can read more about Baric and Shi in the Beforetime and 2019/2020 sections of this website.
Pages 3,211 and 3,212 – On February 1, 2020, Fauci receives an email from Soumya Swaminathan about an upcoming “2019 novel Coronavirus Global research and innovation forum.” While the email written by Swaminathan is nothing out of the ordinary (she does mention that the forum is “being supported [in part] by the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation”), Fauci seems to take exception to her reaching out to other people at NIAID without his approval. Early in the afternoon on February 1st, Fauci sends an email to Hilary Marston and Patricia Conrad that reads, “We need to talk about this later in the day.. I am on Conference calls now. I will call you later. Apparently Soumya is reaching out separately to other people in NIAID.” In addition to being a corrupt liar, it appears Dr. Fauci is also a control freak.
Page 3,221 – On February 1, 2020, Fauci sends an email to Dr. Hugh Auchincloss, the Deputy Director of NIAID. The email has the same document attached that he would send to Lawrence Tabak about an hour later (Baric, Shi et al – Nature medicine – SARS Gain of function.pdf). The subject line says “IMPORTANT” and the email reads, “Hugh: It is essential that we speak this AM. Keep your cell phone on. I have a conference call at 7:45 AM with Azar. It likely will [sic] be over at 8:45 AM. Read this paper as well as the e-mail [sic] that I will forward to you now. You will have tasks today that must be done. Thanks, Tony.” While I can’t be certain about what they would eventually discuss, or what “tasks… must be done,” the email comes off pretty shady to say the least. The job description in Auchincloss’s bio page at the NIH website reads in part, “Overseeing an extensive portfolio of basic, clinical, and applied research, as well as product development for biodefense, HIV/AIDS, infectious diseases, and immune-mediated disorders,” so Auchincloss having intimate knowledge of any and all gain-of-function projects being funded by the NIH would be expected… not to mention involvement in any subsequent cover-ups. Another exchange contained on page 3,206 contains Auchicloss’s response to Fauci which reads, “The paper you sent me says the experiments were performed before the gain of function pause but have since been reviewed and approved by NIH. Not sure what that means since Emily is sure that no Coronavirus work has gone through the P3 framework. She will try to determine if we have any distant ties to this work abroad.” They absolutely had ties to this work that took place “abroad” (in China at the Wuhan Institute of Virology), but did not go through the proper oversight channels (the P3 framework). Busted. The email from Fauci to Auchincloss was sent at 12:29PM and the reply sent from Auchincloss back to Fauci was sent at 11:47AM from a different time zone.
Page 3,222 – On February 1, 2020 at nearly 3AM, Fauci emails Robert Kadlec, the Assistant Secretary of HHS, with a link to the Jon Cohen article from Science Magazine mentioned above and a note that reads, “Bob: This just came out today. Gives a balanced view. Best, Tony.” How come Fauci didn’t send him the same gain-of-function attachment he sent to Auchincloss? It’s also interesting how this email comes off very calm, while some of the other messages in this document sent by Fauci to Hugh Auchincloss, Jeremy Farrar, Francis Collins and others, come off somewhat frantic. That’s probably because Kadlec was appointed by President Trump, was formally a Colonel in the Air Force, and probably has much more integrity than Fauci and his pack of corrupt cronies. That said, I’m only assuming Kadlec was not involved in the NIH/Wuhan lab cover-up, though I can’t know that for sure. After all, Trump did surround himself with more than a few D.C. Swamp Creatures…