This year’s globalist confab ran from May 22nd through the 26th. Here are some of the highlights (or lowlights depending on how you view the following information):
May 23rd – Klaus Schwab tells his fellow megalomaniacs: “…the future isn’t just happening, the future is built by us. By a powerful community as you here in this room. We have the means to improve the state of the world, but two conditions are necessary: The first one, is that we act all as stakeholders of larger communities, so that we serve not only our self-interests but we serve the community. That’s what we call ‘stakeholder responsibility.’ And second, that we collaborate. And this is the reason why you find many opportunities here during the meeting to engage into (inaudible) action and impact-oriented initiatives to make progress related to specific issues on the global agenda.” Quick question: Do you remember taking a vote on, or having any say whatsoever, in this supposed “global agenda”? Yeah, me neither. That’s why anyone who tells you there isn’t a cabal of communists involved in a plot to control the world in a way they see fit is either woefully ignorant or a liar.
May 23rd – Speaking about the intentionally-caused energy crisis the western world is now facing, German Vice Chancellor Robert Habeck explains what the western nations must do to stay the course towards The Great Reset. Habeck said, “First of all, I would say, we have to stick to global markets. If we are now – and this is a tendency I feel everywhere in the world, also in my country as well, also in Europe – if we are now saying ‘Okay, first of all, Germany and other countries are caring for themselves, then we will increase the crisis. If we are only caring for our own food supply, energy supply, it must have a disastrous effect on the prices, on the market. So, first of all, we have to keep the markets open. Second, we have to see that we have to solve one problem not on the back of another one. So if we are now increasing the production of fossil fuels and coal power plants all over the place, that’s a drought in India… We will definitely have more problems in the next years to come. So we have to see that climate neutrality is a big issue of the conference 2020. So two years ago, it seems like ages, but two years ago it’s not gone. So we have to solve one problem with the solutions of the other problem. And third of all, when I mentioned open markets, I would like to stress out [sic] that the roots of the markets – they have to change. So, the globalization – I, I would, I think deglobalization is a wrong phrase. We shouldn’t admit to that. We have to state that we collaborate in one world and have some solidarity in the world, but therefore we have to change the rule of the markets as well.” I know what you’re probably thinking: what the hell is this guy talking about, right? I feel ya. The problem is, this fidgety weirdo is explaining – not very eloquently – that the cabal must resist the temptation to take care of their own countries and citizenry, and instead stay the course they’re on no matter what, because if they don’t, it will have a “disastrous” effect on the markets. The problem with Habeck’s logic (if you even want to call it logic) is that this mentality is exactly what’s causing the “disastrous effect” in the first place. And the problem is only exacerbated by the cabal’s religious adherence to the nonsense they are now calling climate change, as well as its proposed solutions. This is what’s causing the shortages and skyrocketing costs – just look at what the China Joe administration has done in less than two years. It’s their commitment to bullshit “green” energy policies that has me paying $70-$80 to fill my car up with gas (and they think it’s funny to boot). Habeck is really saying western nations should not be tempted to fix their own problems, but instead agree to go through the hardships together – by choice – to prevent ManBearPig from devouring us all. In other words, these people are not only deciding on a planned reduction in the quality of life for hundreds of millions of people, but they’re basing these decisions on a scientific theory that is dubious at best. Only increased production can alleviate an artificial shortage.
May 23 – Kjerstin Braathen, CEO of DNB ASA (Norway’s largest financial services group), shares an outlook similar to that of Habeck’s, but is much more open and in-your-face about it (and of course does it with an obnoxious smile on her face). Braathen said, “We need to accept that there will be some pain in the process. The pace that we need will open up for missteps. It will open up for shortages of energy, it will create inflationary pressures and maybe we need to start talking about that. That that pain is actually worth it, because if we don’t, there’s no business (inaudible), there’s no economy, there’s no welfare. But so far I think we have been a little bit careful actually talking about the pain in the short term that is likely to come from this very important change.” Wow. Let that sink in for a second. First of all, what is this “pace” they “need”? Is it the “pace” needed to cull 80-90% of the world’s population by the year 2030 through the intentional cutting off of food and resources? It sure sounds like it to me, but then again, I’m a kook. And why is Braathen insisting this “pain” will be “worth it”? Worth it for who exactly? It couldn’t possibly be us, because we’re the ones who will be experiencing the pain. Do you think for one second these elitists will be negatively impacted by the decisions they say are necessary? Of course not. These people are taking the world hostage right before our eyes while telling us it is for our own good, and sadly, hardly anyone knows or thinks about it.
May 23 – Australian eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman Grant openly expresses her hatred of free speech while participating in a panel discussion. Grant told attendees, “We are finding ourselves in a place where we have increasing polarization everywhere and everything feels binary when it doesn’t need to be. So I think we’re going to have to think about a recalibration of a whole range of human rights that are playing out online. Ya know, from freedom of speech to the freedom to be free from online violence. Or the right of data protection to the right of child dignity.” I’m not sure how Grant is making the connection between freedom of speech and child dignity or data protection (or the “freedom to be free from online violence” – whatever that is), but making it even more disgusting is the fact she couldn’t keep herself from smiling and chuckling as free speech is being openly targeted for takedown “recalibration” by the world’s elites. If you’ve been keeping up with this timeline, it’s no secret the people running Australia hate all freedoms – especially freedom of speech.
May 23 – During a panel discussion XiNN’s Julia Chatterly, Governor of the Bank of France Francois Villeroy de Galhau, and Credit Suisse Chairman Axel Lehman discuss the arrival of central bank digital currencies within the next five years. The appeal of cryptocurrencies is that they function independently and do not involve the government in any way. Central bank digital currencies are different because the government will not only require their use for many things, but will have the ability to “de-bank” you should you step out of line. The progression to central bank-controlled digital currency is about controlling us, not convenience or efficiency. Cash allows people the ability to possess money that is untrackable and uncontrollable. In other words unless they jail you, the government can’t keep it out of your hands.
May 23 – On a side note, while speaking at a presser in Japan as part of his tour through Asia, China Joe makes a startling admission – an admission that sounds exactly like the things coming out of the mouths of the elites at Davos. Biden said, “When it comes to the gas prices, we’re going through an incredible transition that is taking place. That God-willing, when it’s over, we’ll be stronger and the world will be stronger, and less reliant on fossil fuels.” When China Joe campaigned in 2020, he said he would put an end to fossil fuels. The problem is, this commitment was hidden by the corrupt media, not highlighted. President Trump drew attention to it at a debate (also see this, this, and this), but Biden just lied about his intentions. This is because if he had been honest, and told people they would be paying $5, $6, or $7 at the pumps – which was always the plan – there would have been more than a few Democrats who would have chosen to not vote for him. As it turns out, he still needed massive election fraud in order to steal our country away from the people. But let’s get back to what happened in Switzerland…
May 23 – Some good news came out of Davos when Moderna CEO Stephane Bancel whined about having to throw millions of doses of their experimental gene therapy injections in the garbage due to a lack of demand. Bancel said, “…we are now throwing those into the garbage. It’s sad to say. I’m in the process of throwing 30 million doses in the garbage because nobody wants them. We have a big demand problem. We right now have governments we tried to contact… but also through the Washington, the embassies in Washington – every country – and nobody wants to take them.” He then goes on to complain about the fact there are 7 billion doses of mRNA gene therapy jabs just sitting around and that “the Chinese don’t want the vaccine of mRNA” (Correct. Aside from a few hundred people in mRNA jab trials, they haven’t taken these drugs at all). He continues, “We have more than a dose per person [available] and as we just discussed the issue in many countries is people don’t want vaccines. In the US people don’t want vaccines. Around the world we have a lot of people who don’t want the vaccine… so we don’t have a capacity issue around the planet. It is not true. It was true two years ago, it’s not true today.” Well maybe people have become aware of the fact the shots don’t work. Every day we hear about, or know someone, who is “fully vaxxed and boosted” yet comes down with COVID anyway. Moreover, the shots don’t guarantee that you won’t need to be hospitalized or that you won’t die. So then what’s the point of taking this garbage other than to enrich pharmaceutical companies like Pfizer and Moderna? There is none. I’m really glad to see people are finally waking up to this scam.
May 23 – Oxfam International’s Executive Director Gabriela Buche tells Davos attendees COVID “has been one of the most profitable products ever.” Very strange, I know. Buche said, “The rise in billionaires, you know, has been unprecedented during the pandemic and there have been several sectors where that has been mostly concentrated. And one is, in fact, the pharma sector, because COVID has been one of the most profitable products ever, so that’s one point to discuss and our report out today is called ‘Profiting From Pain’ – how those delays in making this technology available and really having people vaccinated early has contributed to that. But also, as we said earlier, it’s not only the direct health impacts, but it’s the economic social impacts on all parts of the population and in reality an increase in inequality, reversing the trend of the last few years where inequality had reduced between rich countries and poor countries. Unfortunately now it has widened, and the study… saying every 30 hours a new billionaire has been (inaudible) during the pandemic.” I’m going to give Buche the benefit of the doubt and assume she meant the COVID mRNA jabs are the most profitable product ever. In any event, a new billionaire every 30 hours for two years shows how this entire ordeal has been an absolute bonanza for people in high places. Here’s an article about the Oxfam report mentioned.
May 24 – John Michael Evans, President of Alibaba Group and former Goldman Sachs minion, brags about the development of technology that will be able to track and trace not only your whereabouts, but what you eat and buy. Evans said, “We’re developing, through technology, an ability for consumers to measure their own carbon footprint. What does that mean? Where are they traveling? How are they traveling? What are they eating? What are they consuming on the platform? So: individual carbon footprint tracker. Stay tuned, we don’t have it operational yet, but this is something that we’re working on.” Now I can’t help but wonder… Why the hell would I need a device to tell me what I ate, what I purchased and where I traveled to? The answer is: I wouldn’t. Notice Evans didn’t say “Where am I traveling?” and “What am I eating?” He said “they.” What are “they” eating, where are “they” traveling”? This device is being designed to let the people who want to control what we eat and buy, and where we travel, to have access to this information as part of some type of program meant to limit those things. Doesn’t the future these people have planned for us sound amazing??
May 24 – Nokia CEO Pekka Lundmark says 6G technology will be here by 2030, but it won’t be accessed through your smartphone. When asked when technology will change forms and be “something that’s on your face, glasses, and when computing’s all on the edge,” Lundmark responds by saying, “First of all, it will definitely happen. I was talking about 6G earlier, which is around 2030. I would say that by then definitely the smartphone as we know it today will not anymore be the most usual common interface. Many of these things will be built directly into our bodies…. Holograms will be very, very high quality in the era of 6G. I’ve already seen 5G-based hologram demonstrations. They already work, but then with the next generation technology, I mean we could be having these meetings so that in reality we would be sitting in different parts of the world.” Here’s an article by CNBC explaining all of this like it’s no big deal.
May 24 – It wouldn’t truly be a globalist confab without input from perhaps the biggest tech giant on the planet – Google. Participating in the event was YouTube’s smiley-faced free speech-hating CEO Susan Wojcicki. Speaking about YouTube’s “crack down” on misinformation and other content that goes against establishment narratives Wojcicki said, “We’re definitely investing a huge amount to make sure we’re fighting misinformation and there are a number of different ways that we look at this. So, first would be from a policy standpoint, we would look at content that we would think about in terms of being violative of our policies. So if you look at COVID, for example, we came up with 10 different policies we said would be violative. Like, an example of that would be saying that COVID came from something other than a virus, and we did see people attacking 5G equipment, for example, because they thought that it was causing COVID… The second one would be really raising up authoritative information. So, if you are dealing with a sensitive subject like news, health, science, we are gonna make sure that what we’re recommending is coming from a trusted, well-known publisher that can be reliable… The third is making sure we, if there’s content that’s borderline content – that technically meets our policy but is lower quality – that’s content that we basically will not recommend to our users. Our users could still access it, but they will not recommend it. And then lastly we’re just really careful about what we monetize, so we always wanna make sure that there’s no incentive. So, for example, with regard to climate change we don’t monetize any kind of climate change material so there’s no incentive for you to keep publishing that material that is propagating something that is generally understood as not accurate information.” For starters, Wojcicki has never struck me as someone who is intelligent. She comes off more like a New World Order footrest, and a person who is willing to do things most people do not want or like – like censorship – and is therefore rewarded with power and a high-paying job. Moreover, many of the videos and content creators these people want to restrict are simply being targeted for going against the establishment narrative or whatever latest propaganda is being pushed. When Wojcicki brought up COVID, for example, she mentioned banning info about 5G equipment being the cause. Not only is this theory plausible in my opinion, but she presents the 5G theory as if it’s the only thing YouTube had a problem with in regard to COVID. This is just an attempt to make the company’s policies sound reasonable. More than a few people have come to believe COVID came out of a lab at the Wuhan Institute of Virology, myself included, but saying this out loud is something that would be censored. COVID mitigation policies like lockdowns and masking didn’t work, but pointing this out would get you banned. We also know COVID is a very treatable disease. Several well-established and safe off label drugs have been proven to be effective against it, yet documenting this fact would get your video taken down. The information they want you to look at isn’t authoritative, it’s just presented to you in an authoritarian fashion. This does not make what they want you to view trustworthy or legitimate in any way. Just look at all of the times during the writing of this timeline a video about some aspect of the pandemic was removed for violating YouTube’s bullshit policies. Wojcicki’s fascistic comments begin at the 13:13 mark of the linked video.
May 25 – Klaus Schwab and Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla discuss “conspiracy people” and what dicks we are. After going on for a while about how Pfizer will be making their products available at cost to the 45 poorest countries in the world (they just don’t want to have to throw it away), and how some of the western nations are even donating the jabs because the people living there “aren’t educated enough to believe the vaccines are doing well,” Schwab and Bourla talk about liabilities and the people who represent an impediment to their unwanted and unnecessary mass experiment. The exchange went like this:
Schwab – “When you get the conditional approval… who is actually carrying the risk and the liability… if it’s not working out well?”
Bourla – “Most countries, they indemnify that. In the US, in Europe, it was always clearly indemnified so they are taking the liability if there are lawsuits for example…”
Schwab – “So the government is taking the risk…”
Bourla – “It is. There was some issues with… some countries that weren’t familiar with that. What was our concern with the vaccine… we knew that there is a very fanatic group of anti-vaxxers that would go after us no matter what. They will claim that the sun didn’t go up because people were vaccinated and that created issues with the crop, ‘So, I’m suing you.’ And one thing it is to sue you in the US, another thing is to sue you in a country where the legal system is not up to that standard, or Switzerland. So, I think that’s behind us. Everything went okay and I think we can move on.”
Schwab – “I think we were both targets of the anti-vaccines movements and the conspiracy people claiming that I had tripled – I wonder what it is – tripled COVID, where I was it had got hundreds of thousands of clicks and so on, I know you were also target…”
Bourla – “I read one day that I was arrested by FBI.”
Schwab – “Same happened to me.”
Bourla – “And there are pictures, pictures of me and the FBI officers – I don’t know how – (inaudible) the surprising thing it is, the same publication – I found out because they had published the previous one that was arrested was the Pope, by FBI. So ridiculous.”
Schwab – “Yeah, so we are good company.”
Bourla – “At least I was in good company.”
Schwab – “Yeah, but that was such a success with the mRNA technology. How confident can we be or how hopeful can we be that this technology helps also many other diseases – cancer particularly, malaria I think was mentioned in the media – can you lift the curtain on what’s happening in this respect?”
Bourla – “Yes. I think we will see a lot of advancements with mRNA. And the good thing, after the success of COVID it is that right now we have a substantial wave of companies – biotechs and big pharmas – that are working on mRNA a lot, and they are working on multiple applications of mRNA. So I think the first thing that I’m hopeful to see it is other vaccines, other than COVID. A flu vaccine with mRNA, a single vaccine with mRNA or other vaccines with mRNA. The second wave I think that we could see it is cancer… There is a lot of research that is happening for many years now trying to use your immune system to attack your cancer cells. To train your immune system as the vaccine is training to attack the virus and to kill it, is to kill your cancer cells. Then we are going to the third horizon which is the technology will be used for gene editing to be able, if people are born, they have a genetic disease, that is right now it is untreatable and in many cases a death sentence… Now we have some hopes that maybe that also can work. So we will see a lot of advancements…”
The exchange begins at the 23:43 mark of the linked video.
May 26 – To keep things simple for the plebs, The WEF publishes a nice little summary of the short term plans they’re working on as a means to an end in achieving their long term goal of world domination.