March 2025 - All The Birds One Stone

March 1 – Great news! Ivermectin.com is once again able to accept credit and debit card payments. In addition to ivermectin, they also sell other drugs including azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, mebendazole, and fenbendazole, so get yourself stocked up. Over this past winter alone I was able to help several friends and family members by providing them with medications they needed, one of whom is a veteran that was sent away with nothing from the VA hospital… not even antibiotics. Sad!

Disgraced former New York governor Andrew Cuomo takes to X to announce he is running for mayor of New York City. In an accompanying 17-minute video, Cuomo threw the current mayor, Eric Adams, under the bus, while accepting no responsibility for the diminishing quality of life New Yorkers have been experiencing for quite some time – though he did admit generally to making “mistakes” in the past. Is it possible the criminal referral sent by the House COVID subcommittee to the DOJ will one day prove to be his undoing? I doubt it. See September 9th, 2024 for background on the referral.
During an appearance on Fox & Friends Weekend, US Secretary of Agriculture Brooke Rollins addresses the ongoing egg shortage in part by encouraging Americans to raise chickens in their own backyards. Unsurprisingly, dishonest Democrats like Schmuck Schumer are claiming this suggestion is meant to mock the American people, but judging by the replies to his arrogant Tweet, no one is buying his clown world bullshit. You have to hand it to the Democrats though, whether it’s promoting terrorism against Elon Musk or lying about a problem they themselves created, they sure know how to stay on script… Literally.

March 2 – In response to the supposed measles outbreak occurring in Texas, HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy has an opinion piece published at the Fox News website to assure the public his agency will be offering “technical assistance, laboratory support, vaccines, and therapeutic medications as needed.” Kennedy also wrote, “While there is no approved antiviral for those who may be infected, CDC has recently updated their recommendation supporting administration of vitamin A under the supervision of a physician for those with mild, moderate, and severe infection. Studies have found that vitamin A can dramatically reduce measles mortality… All parents should consult with their healthcare providers to understand their options to get the MMR vaccine. The decision to vaccinate is a personal one. Vaccines not only protect individual children from measles, but also contribute to community immunity, protecting those who are unable to be vaccinated due to medical reasons. Tens of thousands died with, or of, measles annually in 19th Century America. By 1960 – before the vaccine’s introduction – improvements in sanitation and nutrition had eliminated 98% of measles deaths. Good nutrition remains [the] best defense against most chronic and infectious illnesses. Vitamins A, C, and D, and foods rich in vitamins B12, C, and E should be part of a balanced diet.” While I’m sure some will have a problem with this and accuse Kennedy of pushing vaccines, I don’t see the problem with offering up some well-rounded advice. One key difference I noticed right away was how Kennedy referred to good nutrition as our best defense against illness, while in recent years most public health officials would insist on a series of Big Pharma Frankenshots as the only way to stay “healthy.” Moreover, the newest MMR jab is a traditional vaccine intended to prevent a person from getting sick, while the mRNA COVID jabs that were brought to market in late 2020 prevent nothing, and only claim to offer recipients “protection” from an illness they may still eventually contract despite being vaxxed.

Update (3/3/25): Here we go… Straight Arrow News, which is as crooked as a barrel of snakes judging by some of the other articles I read while there, publishes a piece titled, “RFK Jr. says measles outbreak is a ‘call to action,’ pushes vaccines.” Talk about a stretch… Playing fast and loose with the truth, author Craig Nigrelli begins his article by writing, “[h]ealth Secretary Robert F. Kennedy Jr. appears to be changing his tune on certain vaccines after years of casting doubt on their efficacy.” Sorry, Craig. I didn’t get that impression. This type of pathetic propaganda is deployed to gaslight and create dissension among voters, not inform them. A few of the other op-ed winners I read on “Straight Arrow” were “Trump moves to silence the free press, free speech,” “Yes, Trump is putting your Social Security at risk,” and my personal favorite, “Trump tricked MAGA voters, now aspires for dictatorship.” When you consider the fact this site publishes David Pakman’s leftist drivel, it becomes clear this is one you should definitely try to steer clear of. Is it me, or is it the job of just about every so-called “journalist” out there to sow discord and foment mistrust among everyday people?

A Midwestern Doctor publishes a fantastic article at their Substack answering the question, “Why Did The FDA Greenlight The COVID Vaccines?” Check it out.

March 3 – A study is published in Vaccine titled, “Comparative analysis of fourteen COVID-19 vaccine injury compensation systems and claim approval rates.” After analyzing data from the no-fault vaccine injury compensation schemes of 14 different countries, researchers found the US system to be the worst as it processes only 25% of the claims submitted and approves only 3%. The UK’s compensation system is also terrible with an approval rate of 2.64%, though they manage to process about 50% of the claims they receive on a yearly basis.

March 4 – Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) sends a letter to HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy requesting he look into a shady transaction that took place during the final months of the China Joe administration. According to the letter, $28M was sent from the NIH’s ARPA-H research program to “Vaccine Company Inc.,” a company registered to a PO Box in Maryland and run by two former Biden staffers. For all of the egregious details check out the 4-page letter.

The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) reports in 2020-2021 the Small Business Administration “issued 3,095 loans, including PPP (Paycheck Protection Program) and EIDL (Economic Injury Disaster Loan), for $333M to borrowers over 115 years old who were still marked as alive in the Social Security database. In one case, a 157 years old individual received $36k in loans.”

March 5 – Benjamin Rushe has an article published at the American Thinker website criticizing Dr. Marty Makary and making a strong case that he is the wrong choice for FDA Commissioner. While Makary tried to do some good at various points during the COVID scamdemic, Rushe points out that “[o]nly when it was popular and MAGA-like to speak out against COVID vaccine approval and mandates did Makary change his tune, although he never explained his former scientifically and epidemiologically unjustifiable recommendations… His behavior throughout the COVID vaccine saga shows that he is a political follower, not a scientific leader. He makes important decisions based on how the political wind is blowing, not by careful and complete data analysis.” He then provides readers with plenty of details regarding Makary’s record on things like masks, lockdowns and vaccines. Though I was initially excited to hear that Makary was tapped to fill this crucial role at a very important regulatory agency, the case Rushe makes against him is convincing. Update (3/25/25): Makary is confirmed by the US Senate to become the next FDA commissioner. Dr. Jay Bhattacharya was also confirmed to head-up the National Institutes of Health.

March 6 – A study is published in the Journal of Clinical Medicine titled, “Broad-Spectrum Adverse Events of Special Interests Based on Immune Response Following COVID-19 Vaccination: A Large-Scale Population-Based Cohort Study.” Looking at a sizable sample of over 1.7M Koreans, researchers found clot shot recipients were twice as likely to experience issues such as hair loss, warts, shingles, menstrual irregularities, inner ear infections, and gum disease when compared to the unvaxxed. Issues like tinnitus, glaucoma, bruising and visual impairment also occurred at significantly higher rates among the “vaccinated.” Also see this.

After being unjustly retracted from Springer Nature despite a successful peer review, a study now-titled “Cardiac Findings in COVID-19 Patients Treated with HAZDPac” is republished in the International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science. The ProgenaBiome/McCullough Foundation study found the use of hydroxychloroquine to treat COVID was safe, did not cause heart issues, and was not associated with prolonged QTc. Since 2020 we’ve been fed nothing but lies about drugs like HCQ in order to make us believe the only thing that would save us from the Wuhan Red Death was Big Pharma’s experimental gene therapy drugs. How many lives could have been saved if doctors had been allowed to prescribe medications we knew were effective without the threat of losing everything they ever worked for? Also see this.

March 7 – A study is published in the Journal of Clinical Trials titled, “The Discrepancy Between the Number of Saved Lives with COVID-19 Vaccination and Statistics of Our World [in] Data.” The paper reads in part, “[a]ccording to Our World [in] Data, 57.94 million people died in the world in 2019. In 2020, when COVID-19 began to spread, 63.17 million people died. In 2021, when COVID-19 vaccinations started around the world, 69.25 million people died that year… The living circumstances on the planet were similar in 2020 and 2021. In 2020 and in 2021, we had COVID-19 pandemics. The main difference in living circumstances of the global population was COVID-19 vaccination in 2021. Our World [in] Data confirms that COVID-19 vaccination increased the ‘global mortality’ in 2020, which was 6.30 million, by an additional 6.08 million in 2021… None of the articles that claim that COVID-19 vaccines saved lives used an appropriate method comparing the mortality rate of the vaccinated population with the mortality rate of the unvaccinated population. They all start with the unproven hypothesis that vaccines are saving lives. They build their models on the preposition of how many more people would die if there were no vaccination.

Such an example is the article in Lancet that claims that vaccination in 2021 saved around 14 million lives. If these were true then in 2021, 14 million fewer would die than in 2020… This is highly speculative because it has never been proven that COVID-19 vaccines save lives. It was demonstrated that they increased the mortality rate in 2021 by 14.5%. The article in the Lancet was published in September 2022. At that time, all statistical data in developed countries were available to calculate the mortality rate of vaccinated and unvaccinated parts of the population in 2021 and prove that COVID-19 vaccines save lives. This was not done. The authors developed a theoretical study and mathematical modeling unrelated to existing statistical data and have no real scientific validity… All models that try to evaluate the efficiency of COVID-19 vaccination start with the preposition that vaccines saved lives (preposition A). None of them has compared the mortality rate of the vaccinated part of the population with the rate of mortality of the unvaccinated part of the population, which is the only valid scientific method to prove the efficiency of COVID-19 vaccination. Their starting position (A) is theoretical and is not based on statistical data. From the methodological point of view, this is an inadmissible and irreparable error… The second methodological error of this study is that it speculates how many more people would die if there were no vaccination. This is a preposition (B). Their speculative calculations proving preposition (B) have no scientific validity because preposition (A) in their research was not proved. A not proved → B has no scientific validity.”

As if this wasn’t bad enough, the COVID cult also tries to have it both ways… Back in February 0f 2022, while looking over a document out of the UK Health Security Agency (UKHSA) titled, “COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report: Week 7,” I noticed something that could only be described as a complete contradiction of the conclusion reached by the fraudulent paper published in the Lancet. A notation beneath Table 12 (page 42) reads, “[i]n the context of very high vaccine coverage in the population, even with a highly effective vaccine, it is expected that a large proportion of cases, hospitalisations and deaths would occur in vaccinated individuals, simply because a larger proportion of the population are vaccinated than unvaccinated and no vaccine is 100% effective. This is especially true because vaccination has been prioritised in individuals who are more susceptible or more at risk of severe disease. Individuals in risk groups may also be more at risk of hospitalisation or death due to non-COVID-19 causes, and thus may be hospitalised or die with COVID-19 rather than because of COVID-19.” I had been reading these reports for a while at that point to track the number of cases, hospitalizations and deaths occurring for both the vaxxed and unvaxxed, and the numbers continually skewed in favor of the unvaxxed. When this particular report was published on February 17, 2022, the vaxxed accounted for 84.7% of the COVID deaths included in the data – and that was me being generous by counting those who had only received one dose in with the unvaxxed death total. Moreover, the numbers favored the vaxxed more as the age groupings increased! All of that said, the claim being made here is outrageous for several reasons:

1) They were targeting EVERYONE with the vaccine, not just vulnerable populations, and the emergency use authorization kept being extended to more and more age groups until the clot shots were approved for use in babies just six months old. Considering the fact pregnant women were also being encouraged to get jabbed, there are countless children out there who will never live a day of their life having not been exposed – at some point – to Big Pharma spike proteins… Crazy thought, but I digress. 2) The main selling point used to pressure the public into receiving the “vaccine” was that it would prevent hospitalization and death (since it didn’t prevent you from getting the illness as a vaccine normally would – see September 1, 2021), then not only did the opposite occur, but they claimed to have “expected” that. 3) There are likely “susceptible” and “at risk” people making up at least some portion of the unvaxxed deaths, but just like the assumption the shots saved millions of lives, there’s also no data supporting the notion that people in these categories benefited in any way from taking the jab. It’s no wonder UKHSA eventually stopped including these data tables in their weekly razzle-dazzle “science” reports… The truth might cause a revolution.

Former NIH Director Francis Collins cranks the cringe meter up to 11 by trying to initiate a sing-along at the “Stand Up For Science” rally in Washington, D.C. Events like this are where COVID cult members and other assorted crazy people can act like they know more than everyone else because they choose to believe the lies told to them by Big Pharma, the government, and the media – which by 2025 standards makes this just another typical leftist gathering… “So it’s all the good people, but the second line, part of this family, the last line, we’re joined together by this noble dream. Do that with me…” Noble dream? Get bent, creep.

March 8 – The Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) reports in 2020-2021 the Small Business Administration “granted 5,593 loans for $312M to borrowers whose only listed owner was 11 years old or younger at the time of the loan.”

March 9 – On this week’s episode of Full Measure, independent journalist Sharyl Attkisson speaks to an MMR vaccine whistleblower named Stephen Krahling about a project he worked on at Merck called “Protocol 7.” According to Krahling, he came to work for the company in the midst of a potential scandal as it was believed their widely used MMR vaccine was defective because it did not remain efficacious for the entirety of its two year shelf life. Since this would have enormous and devastating ramifications for the company, they began “overfilling” the vaccine vials, which means they added more live virus for measles, mumps and rubella. While this would end up making the vaccines potent for a longer period of time, it also made them more dangerous for kids who received it close to the manufacturing date. Even after this adjustment, however, the mumps virus included in the vaccine was still dying off too fast, and this led the company to begin the case study known as “Protocol 7.” Krahling told Attkisson that in order for Merck to “prove” the vaccine was still effective despite the mumps virus not being potent enough to work, the company resorted to falsifying documents in a way that would show what the FDA wanted to see. When the outrage of Krahling and several other scientists at Merck became known by high level people at the company, he was told it was a business decision and that he should not worry about it (Merck stood to lose billions in government contract money if the inefficacy of their product had become known). Krahling was also threatened with jail if he went to the FDA to blow the whistle – which he had already done at that point. The FDA eventually followed up on Krahling’s claims and discovered they were indeed true, yet they still continued to trust Merck about the efficacy of their products. In 2010, Krahling and another whistleblower sued Merck for lying to the CDC and defrauding taxpayers out of money. Fourteen years later, in 2024, the case was dismissed because the judge claimed that since the CDC was aware of the potential fraud and lack of efficacy but continued to purchase and recommend the vaccines anyway, they did not defraud taxpayers. Because of this lack of efficacy, mumps outbreaks have continued over the years, yet Merck has never been held accountable. Remember this the next time you hear a fake news clown talk about what a great job our drug regulators do, or suggest that RFK Jr. is a threat to public health…

The Western Journal publishes a synopsis of the supposed measles outbreak occurring in Texas in an article titled, “This 1 Measles Graph Obliterates the RFK-Hating Media’s Fear-Mongering.” It’s not too long and worth a read.

March 10 – Senator Joni Ernst (R-IA) and House Rep Michael Cloud (R-TX) introduce legislation intended to get back some of the $3B in spending authorized by China Joe’s 2022 “Inflation Reduction Act” to provide the USPS with 50,000 electric trucks. So far, less than 100 trucks have been delivered. Another day, another leftist boondoggle.

Speaking of boondoggles, the Center for Renewing America releases a report titled, “DEI Spending in the Biden Administration.” According to the report, in just four short years the China Joe regime spent over $1 TRILLION on various DEI initiatives.

March 11 – RFK Jr. does an interview with Fox News’ Sean Hannity at a Steak ‘n Shake restaurant after the company announced they will now be using all natural beef tallow instead of seed oils to fry foods at all of their locations. During the interview, RFK was asked about what his agencies are doing to address the bird flu issue, and he told Hannity (5:30 mark), “All of my agencies advise against vaccination of birds, because if you vaccinate with a leaky vaccine… you turn those flocks into mutation factories… The question is: should you cull those flocks? Most of our scientists are against the culling operation. They think that we should be testing therapeutics on those flocks. They should isolate them. You should let the disease go through them and identify the birds that survive, which are the birds that probably have a genetic inclination for immunity. And those should be the birds that we breed, like the wild population. Right now, the White House strategy is to repopulate those farms that have been depopulated. We’ve killed 166 million chickens. That’s why we have an egg crisis. And the disease does not pass through food… As far as we know, you cannot get it from an egg, or milk, or meat from an infected animal… We should armor the domestic populations to insulate them from wild infiltration. This is how these birds are getting infected.”

March 12 – The UK Times reports the former Chancellor of Germany, Angela Merkel, was informed by her federal intelligence service (the Bundesnachrichtendienst or BND) that COVID originated from a lab in Wuhan, China all the way back in 2020. Instead of informing the public, however, she “buried” the report, as did her successor Olaf Scholz.

Hypocrisy Alert!: The British Brainwashing Corporation reports a four-lane highway is being cut through the Amazon rainforest to give the loving leftists attending the COP30 Climate Summit in November a traffic-free route to the Brazilian city of Belém. Now I don’t know about you, but to me nothing says environmentalism like tens of thousands of phony do-gooders traveling halfway around the world to discuss a non-issue, and chopping down a section of protected rainforest to make their excursion more convenient. You just can’t make this shit up…

March 14 – A study is published in the International Journal of Preventive Medicine titled, “COVID-19 Vaccination and Cardiovascular Events: A Systematic Review and Bayesian Multivariate Meta-Analysis of Preventive Benefits and Risks.” Analyzing 21 different studies containing the health outcomes of over 85 million people, researchers discovered a sharp rise in life-threatening cardiovascular events following a COVID vaccine, particularly after the first or second dose. For example, there was a 70% increased risk of coronary artery disease after the first dose, which rose to a 244% increased risk after the second dose. There was a 286% increased risk in heart attacks after the second dose, and a 240% increased risk of stroke after just the first dose. Following one dose of the AstraZeneca viral vector vaccine, there was a massive 389% increase in the risk of developing a heart arrhythmia. Researchers also found there was “a protective effect on stroke… and myocardial infarction… observed after the third dose of the vaccine.” So I guess if you manage to survive the first two doses then you’re in the clear? My God… Amazingly, the researchers wrote the conclusion as if they found nothing out of the ordinary. It reads, “Secondary analysis showed no notable disparity in cardiovascular outcomes between BNT162b2 and mRNA vaccines. The association of COVID-19 vaccination with the risk of coronary artery disease should be considered in future vaccine technologies for the next pandemic.” Hat tip to Dr. Panda.

Table taken from the linked study.

Right wing pundit Stephen L. Miller shares a letter from the Bernie Sanders campaign he received from a friend after they RSVP’d to attend an upcoming event in Colorado… Comrade Bernie (C-VT) and his dopey friend AOC (C-NY) are going to be sticking it to the oligarchy (or something). And if that wasn’t pathetic enough, they are asking attendees to mask-up at their *outdoor* event. Sad!
On the five-year anniversary of the COVID lockdowns, former chief marketing officer and brand president of Levi’s Jennifer Sey (see February 14, 2022) takes to X to vent about what has transpired over the past few years, how her life was turned upside down by it all, and how those in power who made the situation markedly worse have never been held to account. Sey wrote in part, “It’s the 5 year anniversary of lockdowns. I don’t really know what to say about it all… I feel tinges of rage at those who now, or perhaps 2-3 years into it all, pretend at dissent. We needed you then. There is broad recognition that school closures went on too long, and even some acknowledgement that lockdowns were ineffective and terrible human rights violations. The vaccine (and of course mandates – which people lost jobs over) have disappeared from public consciousness… There has been no denunciation of those that drove lockdowns and distancing and toddler masking. These public health bureaucrats should be run out of their jobs and never be allowed to set any policy (or ‘make recommendations’) again. Randi Weingarten should not have any job that has any bearing on children’s lives. Sure Fauci has retired. But people like Barbara Ferrer (LA) and Sara Cody (Santa Clara county) still hold their positions after destroying small businesses and locking kids out of school for a year and a half. And force masking 2 year olds and speech delayed toddlers and hearing impaired adolescents. This was state sanctioned child abuse from the outset. So forgive me, but the modest acknowledgement that maybe we went too far, brings cold comfort.” Sey’s X post isn’t too long and certainly worth the time. It’s important we never forget what the COVID cult and their army of useful idiots did to us.

March 15 – During an appearance on The Focus Group Podcast with Sarah Longwell, smiley-faced COVID tyrant and depopulation enthusiast Leana Wen admits some of the supposed “conspiracy theories” that popped up during the plannedemic were true, and that dissenters should have been allowed to ask questions (which countless people asked anyway despite not having the COVID cult’s permission), saying in part (4:45 mark), “…then there’s another group that feels… that things were not right in the pandemic. They feel like they were not listened to and that somehow the evidence, that… whatever the advice that experts was giving was wrong in some way. Now part of it is that the evidence did change over time. There were different recommendations that came out because the evidence changed. We didn’t know at the beginning, for example, that COVID was airborne, or in the beginning there were not enough masks, and so recommendations were not made to recommend masks, or over time we understood more about the vaccine and what it’s used for and what it’s not used for… and those recommendations changed. So that does change, but I think that there are people who are not satisfied with the fact that they were not listened to at the time. That maybe they were right… looking historically maybe they were right that vaccines did not prevent transmission as they may have believed that it didn’t, and they now feel validated that they were right… I’ll just add one more point about vaccines. I now see such a disparate reaction among my patients even when I speak to them about vaccines, and some of them will say right away, ‘well I don’t want any of those vaccines. I don’t want the flu vaccine. I don’t want tetanus.’ I mean there is this immediate reaction and a pretty visceral reaction to vaccines…”

The topic came up again later when Longwell asked her how people in the medical field are dealing with the post-COVID lack of trust, and Wen replied in part (45:18 mark), “I could see how people may feel as if they cannot ask them [questions] because maybe they did ask them and what came back… not from their physicians, but from somebody else was, ‘oh, well this is a conspiracy theory’ rather than addressing the question head-on. And I know that from my patients I got asked questions specifically about the vaccine that they had heard from somewhere that were important to address, and that there was some truth behind. For example, people were concerned about… the impact of the vaccines on their menstrual periods. Well, as it turns out, there have been studies that have shown that there may be some changes to the menstrual period… in the short term, but addressing that is not a conspiracy theory. It’s addressing this question and then saying here’s the research that we know around this, or… I know that for some time for the first couple of years the questions around natural immunity… the immunity that you get from infection. Those questions were all dismissed because yes, it is true that we didn’t want people to just go on and have chickenpox parties, and get infected all at once. But it’s also true that you do have immunity after – not lifelong immunity – but you do get some degree of pretty good immunity after heavy infection. So I think that addressing those nuances and being clear with people about what we know and what we don’t know, and what we believe is the case based on ongoing research but this could change, I think that leaning into the nuances rather than backing away and just saying ‘well, you’re wrong and I’m right.’ And I think that may be a lesson that we learn especially because we also know that if people keep on hearing that their questions are being dismissed they’re much more likely to go to the source, as you were saying, like an RFK Jr.” Just like everyone else you hear addressing the “mistakes” made during the pandemic, Wen is trying to pass herself off as reasonable, and pretending as if the credibility of the medical field wasn’t intentionally put at risk because the narrative being pushed by the COVID tyrants was all that mattered. This is the same woman who suggested in 2021 that people who refused to be guinea pigs should not be able to leave their homes, suggested life “needs to be hard” for the unvaxxed, and wrote an op-ed comparing those who refused the jab to drunk drivers. But now she wants to make it okay to ask reasonable questions? Give me a break.

Independent journalist Michael Shellenberger shares an intel brief received by former UK Prime Minister Boris Johnson back on March, 27th, 2020 confirming the British government knew “beyond [a] reasonable doubt that COVID-19 was engineered in [the] Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV).” The briefing also raises serious questions about the motivation behind the “proximal origin” article published in Nature ten days earlier on March 17th, 2020. It was this fraudulent paper that officially marked the beginning of the death cult’s commitment to the lie that COVID originated in nature. Were the authors of this article, along with The Twerp, working in league with the Chinese Communist Party to cover their tracks and hide the fact they developed and released a bioweapon that killed upwards of 21M people worldwide? Sure seems like it to me. Also see this.

March 16 – The New York Slimes publishes an opinion piece titled, “We Were Badly Misled About the Event That Changed Our Lives” (click here if you don’t have access to the Slimes). Author Zeynep Tufekci does a decent enough job getting into how the public was lied to about the origin of COVID, as well as the lengths leaders in government and the scientific community went to in order to cover up the truth. What she fails to address, however, is how The Slimes – along with just about every other mainstream propaganda rag – were the ones doing the misleading.

March 18 – A study is published in the Journal of Infection titled, “Post-vaccination IgG4 and IgG2 class switch associates with increased risk of SARS-CoV-2 infections.” After tracking over 200 healthcare workers in Barcelona, Spain beginning in 2020, before the COVID “vaccines” became available, researchers found after three or more doses of an mRNA injection the immune system begins producing more non-cytophilic IgG2 and IgG4 antibodies, and putting the cytophilic/non-cytophilic balance out of order. In some instances they found the IgG4 antibodies to have increased 10-fold, while IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies remained at modest levels or declined over time. Cytophilic IgG1 and IgG3 antibodies are the ones that actively engage the immune system to clear infections (especially the IgG3), whereas non-cytophilic antibodies don’t do much in the way of instructing immune cells to attack viruses. The authors of the study wrote in part, “Elevated IgG4 levels and higher ratios of non-cytophilic to cytophilic antibodies after booster vaccination were significantly associated with an increased risk of breakthrough infections… Moreover, an increased non-cytophilic to cytophilic antibody ratio correlated with reduced functionality, including neutralization.” In other words, the more mRNA injections a person takes, the harder it is for the body to fight off infections including, ironically, COVID infections. This was only found to be the case in people who took mRNA “vaccines,” not those who took adenoviral vector vaccines or were infected naturally. Also see this.

A study is published in Psychological Medicine titled, “Global burden of mental disorders in children and adolescents before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: evidence from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2021.” The study found “an estimated 123.0 million new cases of mental disorders were reported among children and adolescents, with an 11.8% average annual increase in the age-standardized incidence rate during the pandemic. Anxiety disorders, which previously ranked third, became the leading cause of nonfatal disability… while depressive disorders rose to fourth place… The burden grew in most regions, especially among females, those aged 15–24, and in high sociodemographic index (SDI) areas. Based on pre-pandemic data, we estimated an additional burden of 795.0, 165.9, and 622.8 new cases per 100,000 population for total mental disorders, anxiety disorders, and depressive disorders globally in 2021, respectively.”
A study is published in Secrecy and Society titled, “A Narrative Review of the COVID-19 Infodemic and Censorship in Healthcare.” Researchers looked at how “organizations and governments used misinformation, disinformation, censorship, and secrecy to manage the COVID-19 pandemic.” Some of the key takeaways from the study are: 1) public perception was manipulated through the intentional misrepresentation of COVID data, 2) science did not guide the COVID response, money and politics did, 3) censorship ran wild as the COVID tyrants sought to insulate their bogus narrative, 4) the truth about the origin of the pandemic was actively suppressed, 5) the COVID clots shots were mandated despite their inability to stop the spread, 6) adverse events related to the “vaccine” were ignored and/or covered up, 7) cheap, effective COVID treatments were suppressed and demonized as Big Pharma colluded with agencies like the FDA and CDC to push more expensive patented drugs, 8) COVID mitigation measures like masking and lockdowns did much more harm than good, 9) big corporations, Big Tech and the scientific community all played a role in suppressing dissenting voices, and 10) terms like “misinformation” and “disinformation” were wrongfully applied to anyone who questioned or was in disagreement with the official narrative. Hat tip to Nic Hulscher.

March 20 – A study is published in the Journal of Public Health and Emergency which sought to analyze how healthcare workers (HCWs) in Ontario, Canada were impacted by the province’s COVID vax mandate. The authors wrote, “[d]espite controversy, vaccine mandates were implemented in most healthcare settings across Canada, with many still in effect. Many studies have examined the perceived problem of vaccine hesitancy within the healthcare labour force. However, few have investigated the lived experience of mandated vaccination from the perspective of HCWs themselves… Most respondents were unvaccinated, had been terminated for non-compliance with vaccination mandates, experienced personal losses, and reported negative views on mandates and their impacts on patient care. We identified six themes: (I) policies conflicting with scientific evidence and professional practice; (II) conflicts with medical ethics; (III) unacknowledged or dismissed personal hardships; (IV) unacknowledged or dismissed physical harms; (V) discrimination against unvaccinated HCWs and patients; and (VI) negative impacts on patient care… Our study revealed a system in Ontario healthcare settings that inflicts significant harm on non-compliant HCWs and patients, discriminates against these HCWs’ right to work, and violates the right to informed consent of both HCWs and patients. These ethical violations, compounded by the mounting lack of evidence of effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccination to stop viral transmission – this effectiveness proposed as its scientific rationale – call for an urgent reconsideration of the practice.”

A study is published in the International Journal of Cardiovascular Research & Innovation titled, “Myocarditis after SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 vaccination: Epidemiology, outcomes, and new perspectives.” The study found the “vaccine” causes more cases of heart inflammation than COVID itself, a lie we’ve been told since the jab producers were forced to admit this was a side effect. Not only do the jabs themselves cause inflammation, but repeated doses make a person more susceptible to COVID, which in turn could result in heart inflammation. The researchers also push back on the claim that cases of vaccine-related myocarditis and pericarditis are usually mild, and that symptoms go away relatively quickly. Not only can heart inflammation be severe and long-lasting, but even mild cases can end up causing problems in the future. Moreover, mild cases with little to no symptoms can lead to serious heart problems if exerting oneself while unknowingly in this state. Finally, the authors cast doubt on the level of risk/reward the general public was sold on, especially regarding children and young adults. To this point, the authors wrote, “[t]he combination of low risk of severe COVID-19 and a higher likelihood of mRNA vaccine-related myocarditis in younger people makes it difficult to rationalize a policy of ongoing mRNA vaccines in this population. The theoretical absolute benefit of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination is largely contingent on an individual’s baseline risk of severe COVID-19 disease, prior natural immunity, current SARS-CoV-2 and access to early ambulatory treatment protocols. For healthy individuals under the age of 20, 30, or 40, the upper bound of absolute benefits has consistently been negligible across all strains, often approaching zero. Furthermore, no robust studies to date have reliably established a benefit of the COVID-19 vaccination in infants, children and young adults… This underscores the critical need for age- and risk-stratified evaluations to better inform public health policy and to ensure that the harms do not consistently outweigh the theoretical benefits. Given the substantial evidence presented here concerning cardiotoxicity and serious cardiac events in younger generations, we strongly recommend the immediate withdrawal of COVID-19 mRNA products from the market.”
Courtney Merritts, the husband of former loudmouth congressional rep Cori Bush (D-MO), is indicted on two counts of wire fraud after allegedly filing fraudulent applications with the Small Business Administration in 2020 and 2021 to collect $20K through the Economic Injury Disaster Loan Program, and another $20K through the Paycheck Protection Program. According to the press release, “Merritts used the proceeds for his personal benefit and enjoyment. In July 2022, Merritts submitted a loan forgiveness application in which he falsely claimed that this business had 10 employees at the time of the PPP loan, and that he spent the $20,832 on payroll costs. Based on Merritts’ alleged fraudulent representations, the SBA forgave the PPP loan in the amount of $20,832 and the $254.03 in interest.”
America First Legal (AFL) releases documents showing “a disturbing alliance between the GEC [U.S. Department of State’s Global Engagement Center], the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), the British Foreign, Commonwealth, Development Office (FCDO), and media censorship organizations, all working in lock-step to manipulate public discourse, control media narratives, and suppress free speech… The GEC and USAID coordinated efforts to censor ‘COVID-19 misinformation’ and counter ‘COVID-19 propaganda.’” To put it another way, western governments are using the money we pay in taxes to censor and silence anyone who doesn’t buy into their lies. The documents released by AFL can be found here.

March 21 – The North Carolina Supreme Court overturns a ruling from the state’s court of appeals that had been preventing Emily Happel and her son Tanner Smith from suing their public school system and a doctors group for giving Smith the COVID jab without parental consent. Until now, courts had been shielding those responsible from accountability through the misapplication of the PREP Act. Check out my March 12th, 2024 entry for more details. Also see this.

Jimmy Dore interviews independent journalist Sharyl Attkisson about how Big Pharma took over the news media. The linked video is only four minutes and worth checking out.

March 24 – President Trump nominates Dr. Susan Monarez to be the next director of the Centers for Disease Control. The announcement comes after Trump’s nomination of Dr. David Weldon was recently withdrawn. Update (3/25/25): After some online criticism, RFK takes to X to defend Monarez, describing her as “a longtime champion of MAHA values, and a caring, compassionate and brilliant microbiologist and a tech wizard who will reorient CDC toward public health and gold-standard science.” That’s nice to hear from Kennedy, but she didn’t seem too MAHA during the scamdemic, and her resume has deep state/death cult written all over it. Guess we’ll just have to wait and see. Also see this.

The Washington Free Beacon publishes an excellent article titled, “From Feeding the Kids to Fleecing the Government: Inside the Country’s Largest COVID Fraud.” In the piece, author Scott Johnson provides details about the $250M stolen from the federal child nutrition program in Minnesota. For additional background on the fraud, check out my June 7th, 2024 entry about it.
Kyle Becker publishes an informative article at his website titled, “RFK Jr. is Pushing Big Pharma Ad Ban – And Corporate Media is Panicking.” Becker writes in part, “Big Pharma isn’t spending billions on advertising because it cares about your health. It’s doing it because the return on investment [ROI] is enormous. Studies estimate the ROI on direct-to-consumer (DTC) drug ads ranges from 100% to 500%, depending on the drug. In 2025 alone, pharmaceutical companies are projected to spend over $5 billion on national linear TV ads… This revenue isn’t just padding Big Pharma’s pockets – it’s quietly buying influence in the media. Nearly 31% of ad minutes on major nightly news broadcasts in 2024 came from pharmaceutical brands. That means a huge portion of media budgets depend on the very companies they should be holding accountable. And surprise, surprise: when Big Pharma misleads the public, many news outlets are either silent or hesitant to report critically… We saw the worst-case version of this during the COVID-19 pandemic. The novel mRNA shots – rushed to market under emergency use – were sold to the public as miracle solutions. Government officials and media outlets claimed these vaccines would ‘stop infection,’ ‘prevent death entirely’ and ‘end the pandemic.’ Younger, healthy individuals were told they needed them for everyone’s safety, despite already low statistical risk. None of these claims held up… Yet the media rarely corrected course. Why would they? Pharma ads were paying the bills. Meanwhile, federal workers were mandated – and many private sector employees coerced – into getting injections under false pretenses. Billions of dollars flowed to Big Pharma. The American public was misled.” The piece is a quick read and full of useful information, so make sure to check it out.

Image taken from the linked article.

March 25 – A pair of studies (Part I/Part II)are published in the Japanese Journal of Antibiotics titled, “Critical appraisal of multidrug therapy in the ambulatory management of patients with COVID-19 and hypoxemia Part I. Evidence supporting the strength of association,” and “Part II: Causal inference using the Bradford Hill criteria.” Both studies looked at “three published case series of 119 COVID-19 patients with hypoxemia [low blood oxygen levels] who were successfully treated in the United States, Zimbabwe, and Nigeria with similar off-label ivermectin-based multidrug treatments.” In addition to ivermectin, the treatments included different combinations of vitamins C and D, zinc sulfate, nebulized nanosilver, and doxycycline, along with some combination of azithromycin, hydroxychloroquine, prednisone, ceftriaxone, enoxaparin and aspirin. None of the patients treated with these various drug combinations died, though five required hospitalization. Oxygen levels for all patients improved within 24-48 after treatment started (there were 61 patients with blood oxygen levels below 90% when the treatment began).

The abstract written for part two states in part, “efficacy of the two most aggressive ivermectin-based multidrug protocols is supported by the Bradford Hill criteria for temporality, strength of association, biological gradient, biological plausibility, coherence, consistency, and analogy. The causal relation between the treatment of hypoxemic COVID-19 patients using these protocols and the reduction in hospitalizations and mortality is supported as an inference to the best explanation.” In other words, ivermectin-based treatments are very effective against COVID. May we never forget how the death cult and their minions prohibited the use of ivermectin at the height of the COVID scamdemic, even going so far as to take away doctors’ licenses if they dared prescribe it for off-label use – a very common practice in medicine. However, in order to get their clot shots an emergency use authorization they needed to pretend as if there were no drugs out there that could treat the Wuhan Red Death, and so they let countless people suffer and die as a means to an end… And these are the people who claim to be the good guys.

US News and World Report publishes an article from the Associated Presstitutes titled, “5 High-Level CDC Officials Are Leaving in the Latest Turmoil for the Public Health Agency.” The fear mongering hit piece aims to misinform readers by trying to convince them our health agencies are under attack and in a state of “turmoil” because RFK is now running HHS – which couldn’t be further from the truth. Not only are the agencies under his control trimming the fat, they are being repurposed to focus on… health. Sounds crazy, right? Despite the fact that what’s happening at our nation’s health agencies is a net positive and long overdue, the Presstitutes typing up the propaganda for their death cult bosses continue to do their best to misinform Americans. Why should we care that five employees who supervise around 900 employees have decided to leave for political reasons? If they were truly concerned about public health, and the jobs they were doing were that important, it would make them scumbags for leaving just because there’s a new sheriff in town. One of the people quoted in the article is Jason Schwartz, “a Yale University health policy researcher who studies government health agencies.” According to this pearl-clutching, self-important poison ivy league ass clown, “[t]he challenges for these individuals to do their jobs on a daily basis must be enormous. The future of CDC is under threat, by any measure. It’s understandable why individuals may decide to move on rather than see the agency diminished in its works, and its resources, and its ability to do its job.” Is this not the same CDC who completely failed America during the pandemic, and is still recommending that everyone under the sun get injected with dangerous gene therapy drugs? That’s what I thought. Go piss up a rope, Jason.

March 26 – A judge in Ontario, Canada dismisses a lawsuit filed in 2023 by Dan Hartman against the Attorney General of Canada, the former Canadian Health Minister Patty Hajdu, and Health Canada for their role in the 2021 death of his 17-year-old son, Sean. According to Children’s Health Defense Canada, “Ontario Superior Court Justice [Sandra] Antoniani struck down the case without leave to amend, finding that it had no reasonable prospect of success. The court determined that the government did not owe a private duty of care to Sean Hartman and that public health decisions, including vaccine approval and promotion, were core policy matters shielded from liability… Sean developed troubling symptoms within days of receiving the vaccine, including ‘brown circles around his eyes, a rash, vomiting, and an extremely sore shoulder, opposite to his injection shoulder.’ He was taken to the emergency department but was reportedly sent home with pain medication. Thirty-three days later, on September 27, 2021, Sean was found dead beside his bed. A government autopsy determined his cause of death was ‘unascertained,’ meaning no definitive explanation was found. Seeking further answers, Dan Hartman consulted U.S. pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole, who concluded that Sean’s death was caused by spike proteins from the vaccine accumulating in his adrenal glands. Dan Hartman initially filed a claim with the Canadian government’s Vaccine Injury Support Program (VISP), but it was denied within a month due to what the government called insufficient evidence. He has since appealed, providing Dr. Cole’s pathology report, but has yet to receive a response.

In his lawsuit against the government, Hartman alleged that Health Canada and the Minister of Health made false and misleading representations about the vaccine’s safety and efficacy, failed to assess and monitor risks in accordance with their own mandate, and did not properly warn the public about potential adverse effects, including death… Hartman further claimed that the government was negligent in failing to disclose an increased risk of myocarditis in individuals under 40, particularly in adolescent males, and that it failed to conduct adequate post-market surveillance to inform the public of potential risks. The lawsuit also alleged misfeasance in public office, arguing that Health Canada and the Minister were either recklessly indifferent or willfully blind in their oversight of the vaccine approval process and knowingly made representations that misled the public.” Liability protection for drug makers must end. Governments cannot be allowed to push experimental drugs on people through propaganda campaigns and mandates while falsely claiming they’re “safe and effective,” then tell people to pound sand when they die from following the recommendation.

Tucker Carlson releases an interview with Dr. Patrick Soon-Shiong, a billionaire surgeon who purchased the LA Times for $500M back in 2018. During the nearly two-hour discussion a wide range of subjects are covered including RFK, the healthcare industry’s conflict of interest, how to strengthen your immune system, and the epidemic of aggressive cancers – especially among younger people – that Soon-Shiong believes is linked to COVID and the COVID vaccine. The interview is very interesting and worth the time if you have it. Also see this.
Dr. Suzanne Humphries makes an appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast, and while there, reduces the medical establishment’s pro-vaccine narrative to a rubble pile. Humphries is also the co-author of a 2013 book titled “Dissolving Illusions: Disease, Vaccines, and the Forgotten History,” which looks like a terrific read. The interview with Rogan is over two hours long, but thankfully The Vigilant Fox published a boil down article with many of their meaningful exchanges separated into a bunch of short videos. Update (3/29/25): After being doubted for pointing out how multi-dose flu vaccine vials contain mercury, Humphries took to X with the receipts. What will people question next, whether or not the seasonal flu shot is even effective? We’ve known that it’s not for 20 years! Also see this.

March 27 – HHS Secretary Robert Kennedy announces a plan to reduce the agency’s workforce by about 10,000. The biggest cuts will be from the FDA (3,500) and the CDC (2,500), while another 1,200 will be let go from the NIH. Update (4/3/25): RFK plans to reinstate 20% of the people who were let go as they were let go in error. He also told reporters, “[a]nd that was always the plan. Part of the DOGE, we talked about this from the beginning, is we’re going to do 80% cuts, but 20% of those are going to have to be reinstated, because we’ll make mistakes.”

During an appearance on XiNN, Hawaii’s mentally unwell governor Josh Green takes a couple of shots at RFK and tennis great No-vax Djokovic. After falsely claiming the staffing cuts RFK is making at HHS “will cause loss of life,” Green was asked about Djokovic and Kennedy playing tennis together recently – because that’s obviously something everyone wants to hear about – and told Democrat party propagandist Erin Burnett, “This is this kind of BS distraction which we expected from a guy who took the job for celebrity reasons. It is catastrophic for our healthcare system to have RFK there. Shame on Novak for cozying up to this guy. Novak, go play tennis, hit a 160 mph serve, but stay out of public health. I hope someone hits him with an overhead [sic] and shows him what it means to hurt somebody, because that’s what it’s going to be for all these kids that don’t get vaccinated. And for all the parents that have to deal with the consequences of this vitamin A overdose. These are real issues, and these clowns are not public health people. So, go back to the tennis court, definitely good luck at Wimbledon, stay out of public health.” So if kids don’t take all the injections Josh Green says they should, it will be like getting smashed with a tennis ball? Got it, doc. Very scientific stuff… I can’t wait until he’s back on the show after RFK gets the mRNA jabs banned altogether, that should be fun. (If you didn’t already know, this guy is a COVID cult member of the highest order.)
Fierce Pharma reports federal prosecutors are now investigating the timing of the release of Pfizer’s 2020 COVID jab study after a tip from Big Pharma rival GlaxoSmithKline. While it’s quite possible they held back the announcement a vaccine would be coming soon to not boost Trump before the election, it’s also possible they waited to maximize their ability to market it – after the election, when all of the focus could be on the vaccine and Pfizer’s partnership with the government… And if Pfizer’s CEO Albert Bourla somehow knew the election would be rigged, and that in just a couple of months a vaccine-loving, leftist death cult would be taking over, we likely wouldn’t get information like that from a GSK “tip.”
The Daily Economy publishes an informative article about 10 economic indicators that have not recovered post-COVID. It’s a tad on the wonky side, but not long at all and worth a read.

March 28 – XiNN and others report Dr. Peter Marks, the now-former director of the FDA’s Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research, had recently been given the choice to resign or be fired by Robert Kennedy. Marks chose the former and so his resignation will take effect April 5th. Unsurprisingly, every mainstream media article I read about this (and I mean every single one) breathlessly reported the contents of his resignation letter, with all including one specific line: “…it has become clear that truth and transparency are not desired by the Secretary [RFK], but rather he wishes subservient confirmation of his misinformation and lies.” XiNN went even further and included comments from vaccine zealot and Big Pharma lackey Paul Offit and former White House COVID Coordinator (under China Joe) Ashish Jha. Offit told XiNN, “This is what happens when you hire a 20 year virulent anti-vaccine activist who continues to deny the science that vaccines don’t cause autism, and put him in a position of influence. So what you’re about to see is studies done, presumably under the imprimatur of the CDC, showing that vaccines cause autism. That’s what you’re about to see, because he will put in place people who will shoehorn data to make it look that way, which will create more fear, will create likely more people who will choose not to be vaccinated, and you’ll just see more and more in the way of these outbreaks.” Is this guy seriously claiming that RFK will commit fraud in order to arrive at a predetermined conclusion that’s based on nothing? I mean, wow. It sounds to me like Offit has become very nervous about someone trying to get to the bottom of why autism rates have absolutely exploded over the last several decades. I wonder why. Will he be implicated in participating in some kind of cover up, and is now trying to get in front of exposure by making these wild accusations? Not to mention the fact that committing fraud and arriving at predetermined conclusions is exactly how the FDA, CDC and NIH have been operating for the last 30-40 years! These people think we’re stupid!

Jha also chose to invert reality, telling the Democrat party propagandists at XiNN that Marks “helped usher in scientific rigor and transparency into the FDA,” and that his departure makes the FDA “dramatically weaker [and] less effective,” adding “[t]his is not how we make America healthy.” In case you didn’t know already, Marks played a key role in Operation Warp Speed, the federal program that brought the experimental mRNA COVID clot shots to market in less than a year. As I have been writing at this site for years, these shots were not a good thing. In fact, they were a very bad thing. Not only were they ineffective garbage that did nothing to stop the spread of COVID – which is what a “vaccine” is supposed to do – they have killed and maimed countless people worldwide. Moreover, his role in getting the jabs their fraudulent “full approval” on August 23rd, 2021 paved the way for the China Joe administration to enact COVID vaccine mandates, which turned far too many people’s lives upside-down. Marks’ resignation letter is nothing more than a collection of lies the medical establishment has been insisting we believe for decades. His departure from the FDA is excellent news and we should all be thrilled RFK forced him out, despite what the propagandist pigs working in mainstream media would have you believe. Also see this and this.

Update (3/5/25): Marks joins Democratic party propagandist Erin Burnett on XiNN to continue his post-canning disinformation tour. To start the interview, Burnett asked Marks to comment on the coming investigation into the link between vaccines and autism (2:25 mark). Before he could respond, she falsely claimed this link has been “debunked by science” and played a series of out-of-context comments RFK has made about vaccines going back to 2008 (which were all true, of course)… When the card-stacking propaganda reel was finished, Marks responded by saying, “I’m not gonna directly confront Mr. Kennedy, he’ll have to confront his maker for those lies. I just need to say to you as if I was under oath: the vaccines that make it through the vaccine approval process in the United States are – not every vaccine is safe – but those that make it through the approval process are safe, effective, and are high quality. No one at FDA would ever let a vaccine out that they would not give their own children, and it is just breathtaking that anyone would try to dissuade parents from giving their children a vaccine such as the measles vaccine… One just needs to look at the estimate that 50 million lives have been saved over the past 50 years by that vaccine alone.” One thing people in the medical field love to do is point to the bogus estimates they pay to have done to bolster their erroneous position (see the March 7th entry above, for example). Another way to put it would be paying people to conduct studies that will arrive at a predetermined conclusion… but I digress.

After a couple of minutes of vaccine-plugging ended, Marks seems to make a threat about something bad happening to our country now that fake regulators like him are being shown the door. Burnett set the stage by saying (7:45 mark), “I know one of your biggest concerns as you leave the FDA, and I know you’re resigning, but obviously not by choice. You wanted to continue doing your work. Is biowarfare – that is a big concern you have because of what RFK Jr is doing in terms of firings. Biowarfare? What are you talking about?” Marks responded by saying, “I just didn’t regulate vaccines. I also regulated innovative biologic products. By leaving, I leave behind what we did with cell gene therapies that could have helped people, for instance, kids with cancer who had no other treatments, adults with sickle cell disease. I leave behind people who were doing their best to try to speed up treatments for rare diseases. And I also leave behind a group, now gutted, that was ready to respond to natural and man made threats. At any given time, there are many, many viruses that could come, things like Ebola and others that could be very dangerous to our country. We had a group that was prepared to deal with those. Additionally, I can’t go into all the details, but there are man made threats that we were prepared to deal with. Having that capacity means that today I believe we are weaker as a nation, and I believe our adversaries know that we are weaker as a nation because we don’t have that capacity.” I find it hard to believe Marks would say something like this publicly. It’s almost as if he’s inviting our “adversaries” to attack out of bitterness over being forced to resign, and seeing the Big Pharma/FDA revolving door boarded up.

XiNN again cherry-picked the same line from Marks’ letter at the start of the interview.

“Assault on scientific truth,” huh? Fake news is truly the enemy of the people.

Do you see when the measles vaccine was introduced? These people are fantastical liars.

Independent journalist Rav Arora publishes his full-length interview with Phillip Krause, a former FDA official who was the deputy director of the FDA’s Office of Vaccines Research and Review when he resigned in protest in 2021. At the time, Krause was being pressured by top officials at the FDA and the China Joe admin to grant the COVID clot shots full approval in order to pave the way for vaccine mandates. When he refused to do so and insisted on a thorough safety review, he was removed from the process. At that point, his boss Marion Gruber – who came up with the name “Operation Warp Speed” – took the reins on the licensure process and the jabs received full approval shortly thereafter. During the interview, Krause also expresses his disapproval over the way the COVID booster jabs were rolled out in August of 2021 as politicians began deciding on public health policies before scientists signed off on their safety and efficacy. As we now know, the clot shots were neither safe nor effective. The interview is almost two hours long and a chapter summary can be found here.
Utah becomes the first state in the US to ban fluoride in public drinking water. Unsurprisingly, the three Associated Presstitutes writers who wrote the story – that’s right, it took three of them to type this up – started lamenting the news in the very first sentence. The fluoride-loving trio began their piece by writing, “Utah has become the first state to ban fluoride in public drinking water, pushing past opposition from dentists and national health organizations who warn the move will lead to medical problems that disproportionately affect low-income communities.” The article continues much the same way, claiming children’s oral health will be harmed, with one supposed “expert” claiming the politicians in Utah showed “wanton disregard for the oral health and well-being of their constituents.” Please spare us the drama… I can actually remember being at a party many years ago and going back and forth with a guy about fluoride. While I argued fluoride is known to reduce a person’s IQ, especially if regularly exposed at a young age, and shouldn’t be ingested, his argument eventually devolved into repeating, “when the kids start dying! when the kids start dying!” over and over again. (Who knows, maybe he’s a “reporter” now.) My position then, as it remains today, is that even if fluoride does offer a benefit for our teeth when used topically, there is no reason to be drinking it. I use sun tan lotion when I know I’m going to be exposed to the sun for a long period of time, but I don’t drink the stuff. Moreover, if you look at a tube of fluoridated toothpaste, there is now a warning printed on it instructing you to contact poison control if you accidentally ingest it – which doesn’t sound too safe to me. This is great news no matter what three dopey propagandists from the AP say, and hopefully the start of a national movement to get this stuff out of the water for good.

March 29 – Bobbie Anne Cox has an article published at American Thinker titled, “New York Greenlights Quarantine Camps.” I have covered the possibility of these camps becoming a reality in the Empire State at other points in this timeline, but here is the long and short of it… NYS’s “Isolation and Quarantine Procedures” regulation was ruled unconstitutional at the conclusion of a 2022 trial, with the judge noting, “[i]nvoluntary detention is a severe deprivation of individual liberty, far more egregious than other health safety measures, such as requiring mask wearing at certain venues.” Unhappy with the result, NY Governor Kathy Hochul, the NYS DOH, and our Marxist pig woman attorney general Letitia James appealed the decision. In 2023, a panel of five judges reversed the decision and dismissed the case. They reasoned the plaintiffs lacked standing – a common tool used by tyrannical judges who know they can’t rule the way they want based on merit – despite the fact that most of the plaintiffs were NYS lawmakers. As Cox puts it, “it was absurd for the court to claim these lawmakers had no standing to fight against a regulation that usurped their lawmaking power.” Not wanting to back down, Cox filed an appeal in January of 2024 with the NY Court of Appeals, though the appeal was denied in May because the court believed a “lawsuit about a regulation that breaches Separation of Powers and violates our Constitution doesn’t have a constitutional issue in question.” In a last ditch effort to have the case heard, Cox then filed another motion with the court, asking them to hear the case on their own volition – which they denied. Since this was an “emergency” regulation the state was looking to make permanent, and because of the fact it was shot down in 2022, it does not exist today. However, the ruling by the NY Court of Appeals has made it so the NYS Department of Health could reintroduce this regulation in the future and it would already have a legal underpinning. To watch Cox discuss the ruling in an 18-minute interview with Paul Engel from constitutionstudy.com click here.

I would also recommend reading this 2023 fake news “fact check” from the Associated Presstitutes in which they harp on the term “quarantine camps,” and claim that because the regulation in question does not use this terminology, it is a non-existent threat – a straw man argument. Well, here is the text of the “Isolation and Quarantine Procedures” regulation… Read it and decide for yourself if the government needs this kind of power, regardless of whether or not there is an emergency they have to deal with. If you recall, Australia set up these “compounds” (also see this) early on in the scamdemic, and they were not shy about using them. New Zealand also established “quarantine facilities” and used the military to prevent people from escaping. The only reason why the NYS governor and department of health would want these powers on the books is so they can eventually use them, which I think is pretty obvious. But you know, I’m a kook.

An EMT by the name of Harry Fisher takes to X to share what he’s been observing after the mRNA COVID jabs came to market a few years back. Fisher wrote in part, “Every shift now, I’m responding to: Either young adults with sudden heart failure, previously healthy people with liver damage, young children, adults and elderly having seizures with no prior history… This massive horror spike started after the mRNA rollout… I’ve been a paramedic for many, many years. This is not normal. This isn’t about politics. It’s about what I’m seeing with my own eyes every single day I’m on the job. The people we’re picking up didn’t have these conditions before. Lots of them are finally realizing the shots caused their illnesses… Connect the dots. Trust your eyes.”

March 31 – Let’s close out the month with a couple of serious questions… Why on earth, in the spring of 2025, is the CDC still recommending six month old children receive a COVID jab? And why is the CDC still recommending garbage drugs like Paxlovid and Remdesivir? Team Trump needs to get on this ASAP.

Screenshot taken in early April 2025.

The CDC website still recommends the use of garbage drugs to treat COVID.