October 2024 - All The Birds One Stone

October 1 – During a press conference in Houston, Texas, attorney Tony Buzzbee, who’s firm is representing more than 100 alleged victims of Sean “Diddy” Combs and his now-infamous “Freak-Off” parties, reveals the defendants “will not only include individuals, but will also include corporate entities that ultimately profited off this culture and behavior. I’m looking at banks, pharmaceutical companies, [and] hotels. We know that many of these individuals were paid cash. We know that many of these individuals involved, whether they were the ones being assaulted and abused or they were witnessing other people being assaulted and abused, were then paid and threatened and told to leave – typically paid 10 grand in cash and told to leave, and then threatened as they were leaving.” I can’t help wondering whether some of the people written about in this timeline will end up facing charges for their involvement in the depraved activities Diddy and his ilk were engaged in. Also see this.

October 2 – TASR, “The News Agency of the Slovak Republic” (a government news outlet), reports Parliament Member Peter Kotlár – who has been tasked with spearheading an investigation into Slovakia’s COVID response – has submitted a report to the government and is now calling for immediately halting the use of mRNA injections, as well as an official government renunciation of the WHO’s updated pandemic regulations. The press release reads in part, “Kotlár reiterated that the pandemic was ‘an act of bioterrorism’ and a ‘fabricated operation codenamed COVID-19 pandemic.’ According to the Government Proxy [Kotlár], the aim of the operation was to ‘jeopardise human health’ and ‘test the naivete of the global population to follow orders subliminally.’ Yowza! Sounds like this guy’s been reading AllTheBirdsOneStone! But I digress… The release continues, “‘Unless the vaccination with mRNA products is stopped or at least their efficiency and safety is proven, which today I already know it won’t, and unless we save the Slovak Republic from the centralisation of power under the WHO, my task is senseless,’ declared Kotlár, who added that much of the information at his disposal he had acquired ‘illegitimately.’ Kotlár added that he has evidence to back up his claims… [He also] claimed that during his investigation, he had to deal with a shortage of relevant data from Slovakia. ‘There are simply no relevant data, no collection to speak of and no analyses. Hence, there’s no use in employing the Slovak statistics,’ he said and voiced his suspicion that some data has been purposefully deleted after the 2023 general election.” Kotlár even brought up Bill Gates by name during the presser, noting his frequently publicized desire for all of the world to be “vaccinated,” as well as his contribution to the development of mRNA therapeutics.

Update (10/4/24): Politico reports “Slovakia’s Health Minister Zuzana Dolinková announced… she is stepping down over government backing for a prominent anti-vaxxer and insufficient prioritization of health care… Shortly after his re-election last year, Prime Minister Robert Fico backed the initiative by the far-right Slovak National Party (SNS), one of the coalition members, to create a commission investigating pandemic measures. ‘The Slovak public simply needs an answer about the vaccination… why people were vaccinated with various experimental vaccines without any tests, why all sorts of drugs were pushed into people… and what actually happened during Covid,’ said Fico, who was critical about masks and vaccines during the pandemic. Kotlár, who hails from the SNS, was named to his envoy position in January.” Just like President Trump, Fico says and does things the corrupt political/corporate establishment does not like, which is why they tried to kill him, too, back in May. Update 2 (10/16/24): Leftist EU propaganda outlet, Euractiv, pearl-clutches over Kotlár’s report – “which the government is expected to discuss.” In Slovakia, the political will seems to be there. Let’s just hope they are able to get some tangible results from all of this.

The International Bird Flu Summit kicks off in Washington, D.C. which will run through October 4th. According to the brochure, the topics to be discussed include mass fatality management planning, medical countermeasures and delivery of vaccine and antiviral medication. When pandemic planning exercise Event 201 took place in New York City in October of 2019 COVID plannedemic hit just weeks later… Let’s hope the death cult isn’t already gearing up for another one… Update (10/2/24): Reporting from the summit, John Leake shares video footage of an exchange between him and one of the event’s premier speakers, Dr. Syra Madad, during a Q&A session. After just a couple of minutes it becomes quite clear this doctor has no idea how hospitals would treat an influx of patients infected with bird flu should an outbreak actually occur. When asked by Leake if doctors would use corticosteroids to deal with lung and/or pulmonary inflammation, Madad replies by saying, “So I am not a clinician, so I’m not going to answer specific questions on patient management. So I would refer that to our clinical colleagues if there’s a need to utilize any storage steroid treatment.” Dissatisfied with the non-answer, Leake presses further and says, “Well, the reason why I ask is because during the Covid-19 pandemic, there was frustration that the hospitals seem to be adept at isolating patients and putting them on ventilators. But there seemed to be a lack of preparedness in how do we actually help these people to get better, to recover. It sounds like the first line is antivirals. Can you speak about what kind of antivirals would be used against human H5N1?” Madad replies, “Absolutely. So this is all public knowledge, public information. It’s also posted on the CDC website. There are four… antiviral medications like Tamiflu and others that would be utilized in these instances. If additional medication and therapeutics are needed, and if it fits the criteria for treating these patients, we would work in close collaboration with our local health department. I will say, you know, as we look back at Covid-19, right? It’s easy to judge healthcare systems. It’s easy to judge public health on what went wrong and what didn’t. But at that time, when you’re in that specific situation, it’s a kitchen sink approach. Right? You’re trying to do whatever you can to save these patients, and you have very limited information of what works and doesn’t work. And so, again, you’re utilizing the best available knowledge to make that decision. And then as more resources become available and you understand what works and what doesn’t work, you’re able to adjust.” While this approach sounds sensible enough, this is not what happened at any point during COVID. In fact, the kitchen sink approach was explicitly not allowed. Instead, citizens throughout the western world were ~~taken hostage~~ told to hunker down until a “vaccine” (that wasn’t really a vaccine) eventually became available. Despite the great deal of anecdotal evidence available in the spring of 2020 showing doctors were effectively treating COVID, various state medical boards – at the behest of the NIH – began punishing doctors who dared prescribe drugs like hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin off-label for that purpose. So this can mean only one of two things: Madad is completely ignorant about what actually occurred during the COVID scamdemic, or she’s a lying pig who would help ensure a future bird flu pandemic would play out the exact same way. My money is on the latter. Update 2 (10/3/24): Right on cue, XiNN and other outlets begin reporting on a couple of bird flu cases in Commiefornia. Also make sure to check out this report from Children’s Health Defense. Update 3 (10/9/24): The organizer of the summit contacts Leake (at the behest of Madad) and demands he take down the video of their exchange as it is considered a violation of the summit’s “terms and conditions.” Leake complied with the request and deleted it from Twitter, though the original video and a transcript of the exchange can still be found here.

October 3 – Writing for Real Clear Investigations, Lee Fang details how the major COVID vaccine companies were able to exploit a loophole in marketing rules that would normally require them to provide potential consumers with a warning about the risks associated with their experimental Frankenshots. According to Fang, “[b]y casting their spots as public service announcements – promoting the idea that people should get vaccinated, rather than a company’s specific product – drug companies claimed the disclosure requirements did not apply. As a result, the required disclosure about the vaccine operating under emergency approval rarely appeared in any of the ads, even as many employers, including the federal government, required tens of millions of Americans to get vaccinated… Pfizer ran many iterations of its ‘unbranded’ COVID-19 vaccine campaign. The ‘Because of This’ ad campaign featured real people rather than actors answering the question of why they will get vaccinated. ‘Because this year she turns one, and I’m 74,’ the tagline of one Pfizer-sponsored ad read. Another, titled ‘Hug,’ showed two women clutching each other, weeping. ‘Because you can’t hug a computer screen. Why will you get vaccinated?’ the text of the ad asked… Moderna, while operating under the EUA, launched a ‘Make it Yours’ campaign to encourage the use of its vaccine. The company brought on partnerships with the Seattle Seahawks and Boston Red Sox. One of the animated ads featured former Seahawks star Jordan Babineaux, who instructed viewers to ‘always protect the team’ and get vaccinated. ‘With the vaccines here to help millions, we can take steps towards life as we knew it,’ narrated Babineaux. In other cases, third-party groups funded by Pfizer and Moderna blanketed viewers with ads urging vaccination without any disclaimers… Pfizer also tapped the largely unregulated world of influencer marketing. In one instance, the company retained the public relations firm Real Chemistry and an influencer named Darrion Nguyen, who also goes by @Lab_Shenanigans, to create a series of comedic skits mocking vaccine misinformation. The series, titled ‘I Heard It on the Internet,’ mocked critics of vaccine policy as fools who did not follow the science.” Sadly, this unregulated propaganda blitz roped in millions of unsuspecting people, costing far too many their lives. The piece isn’t too long and worth a read.

Sticking to the Big Pharma script, the CDC issues guidance on “staying up to date with COVID-19 vaccines.” According to the “experts,” everyone over the age of six months should get injected with the ineffective and experimental gene therapy drugs the CDC is still wrongly referring to as “vaccines.” The most egregious part of the guidance – which reads like it was written by a middle schooler – is the part that reads, “Getting the 2024-2025 COVID-19 vaccine is especially important if you… [a]re pregnant, breastfeeding, trying to get pregnant, or might become pregnant in the future.” Disgusting. These people are absolute psychos.
The UK Daily Mail publishes an article titled, “Alarming rise of ‘super-fit’ slim young people suffering heart attacks as experts reveal theories for the surge.” Care to take a guess what the supposed experts agree isn’t causing the surge? While the Daily Mail has done some solid reporting about the lab origin of COVID over the last few years, they’re no different than any other mainstream “news” outlet when it comes to explaining away the harm being done by the COVID jabs they continue to incorrectly refer to as “vaccines.” According to the puff piece, “Roughly 0.3 percent of Americans aged 18-44 had a heart attack in 2019 – but last year that rose to 0.5 percent, or one in 200. While that may still seem like a relatively low number, it represents a 66 percent increase in cases in just four years, which doctors call ‘alarming.’ It also means that one in five heart attack patients are now younger than 40. A number of factors are thought to be at play including rampant drug use, obesity, sedentary lifestyles and bad diets. But the timing strongly implies the Covid pandemic has played a role. The virus itself causes widespread inflammation in the body that can damage the heart or lead to blood clots. Depression, anxiety and stress also surged among young people during lockdowns – and all three have been linked to heart attacks… There were millions fewer visits to doctors during the early years of the pandemic, which means chronic conditions that may contribute to heart disease risk went unnoticed… But in many doctors’ view, the timing is simply too coincidental for Covid not to be involved. Studies have shown that, once in the body, the virus can cause the heart to become inflamed, a condition known as myocarditis, leading to damage that makes it harder to pump blood around the body. Over time, in extreme cases, this can damage the organ to the point it becomes too weak to adequately pump enough blood to the rest of your body, causing heart failure. The Covid vaccines made by Pfizer and Moderna have also been shown to cause heart inflammation in rare cases, specifically young men and boys. But real-world research has shown the risk of having this reaction to a vaccine is much lower than the risk you take not getting vaccinated in the first place – because severe Covid is much more likely to damage the heart.” This is 100% false. Why is it that these supposed “experts” never suggest looking at what percentage of the people under the age of 40 having heart attacks took the jab? That would get to the bottom of things real fast, don’t you think? Moreover, how many young people who took the shot experienced only mild heart inflammation and never sought medical attention? Even mildly strenuous activity could spell disaster when heart tissue is inflamed. Unfortunately, the Big Pharma lackeys we refer to as the “media” don’t seem very interested in finding out real answers to real questions, and likely never will.

October 4 – The Gateway Pundit publishes “The Remdesivir Papers,” a 27-page report put together by journalist J.M. Phelps and an active duty service member going by the pseudonym Daniel LeMay. Using information received by a military whistleblower with access to the DOD’s Joint Trauma System, the well-researched report details how pharma giant Gilead and the US military teamed up to experiment on service members by using remdesivir as a treatment for COVID, despite the drug having earned a reputation for being ineffective and, well, downright deadly (the drug is referred to by some as “RunDeathIsNear”). The authors not only reveal the methods by which Gilead distorted the results of several remdesivir studies cited by the government to justify its use, but show how over the course of five separate studies “64 percent of patients who died between March 2020 and March 2024 were treated with remdesivir,” totaling a whopping 601 people.

Additional background: Back on November 27th, 2019, the New England Journal of Medicine published a study titled, “A Randomized, Controlled Trial of Ebola Virus Disease Therapeutics.” The study tested four separate treatments for Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo, and of the 673 patients who participated, 175 received remdesivir. The section titled “Mortality” reads in part, “On August 9, 2019, when 681 patients had been enrolled, the data and safety monitoring board conducted an interim analysis on data from 499 patients and, on the basis of two observations, recommended terminating random assignment to ZMapp and remdesivir.” This is because 53% of the people given remdesivir died during the trial and continued use of the drug could not be justified. The study went on to say while “most characteristics at baseline were balanced across the four groups, values for serum creatinine and aminotransferases were higher in the ZMapp and remdesivir groups than in the MAb114 and REGN-EB3 groups,” which indicates the drugs were damaging to both the liver and kidneys. The researchers who released The Remdesivir Papers point out how service members were lied to when signing their “Informed Consent Form.” The authors wrote in part, “Regarding the treatment of people in Africa with the Ebola virus, the consent form simply read: ‘Some of these people had side effects.’ There was no mention that the use of remdesivir resulted in the highest mortality rate among participants in a trial of four investigational therapies for Ebola in the Democratic Republic of Congo. For this reason, it’s interesting to note that neither the Department of the Army Surgeon General nor the USAMRDC [United States Army Medical Research and Development Command] makes mention of the possibility of death in the informed consent provided to participants in the trial. Why? Were deaths during the trial inaccurately attributed to COVID19 when they could/should have been attributed to the use of remdesivir? It’s also interesting to note that as early as May 2020, MedPage Today was encouraging health professionals to be on the lookout for adverse event risks involving the liver and kidneys. Only the mention of a common side effect – an increase in liver function test results – was included. Nothing was shared of the possibility of poor liver function.” The authors go on to list the many “organ-based adverse effects” caused by this drug including arrhythmias, cardiac arrest, respiratory failure, hyperglycemia, acute kidney injury, delirium and multi-organ dysfunction. The consent form also stated the specific treatment protocol used in the studies would be published online (as required by law), and that the summary of results would eventually be made available as well. To date, neither has been provided to the surviving participants or the general public. For more information see this article published at the Children’s Health Defense website and this Good Morning CHD interview with former US Army Lieutenant Colonel Brad Miller and host Michael Nevradakis. Miller was relieved of his battalion command in October 2021 for refusing to capitulate to Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin’s unscientific COVID vax mandate.

During a Town Hall event in Fayetteville, North Carolina, a former Green Beret named John Frankman asks President Trump, “The Biden-Harris DOD COVID-19 vaccine mandate was very damaging to the military. It forced thousands of service members out, and thousands do not want to join now. The Biden-Harris DOD [also] has the lowest recruiting in modern history, and now they’re pushing more woke training. So how do you plan to repair the military from the damage that was done and hold military leaders accountable?” Trump replies by saying in part, “So I want to have them come back into the military with back pay. And they’ve been talking about that, but it never happened. They never did what they said they were going to do. There should have never been a mandate. That should have never happened. You should have been given choice, as we say. We want choice in education, and we want a choice there, too. And that should have never happened. And we’ve lost some of our best people in the military, too… They’re going to fire their asses.” The importance of preventing another Democrat steal and getting Trump back into the White House next month cannot be overstated as it is likely our one-and-only chance at any meaningful COVID accountability.

October 5 – A study is published in the Journal of the Endocrine Society titled, “7053 Sex Differences in Endocrine-Related Pre-existing, COVID-19- and COVID-19 Vaccine-Related Health Conditions and Adverse Events.” Researchers examined the impact the COVID jabs had on the endocrine system by surveying ~8,000-10,000 people around the world between February 2022 and October 2023 (62.5% of participants were from the US). The abstract reads in part, “Nearly 1.49% of respondents reported hospitalization after COVID-19, whereas 5.69% of the respondents reported hospitalization after vaccination in our cohort. SARS-CoV-2-related severe symptoms were reported by ∼9.3% of COVID-19 vaccinated versus 6.7% of unvaccinated individuals. Women reported more vaccine-related adverse events (AEs) than men; 30% of men and 19% of women reported no AEs after any vaccination dose. After the first dose, 60% of women and 48% of men reported some AEs, whereas after the second dose, 46% of women and 40% of men reported experiencing several AEs… In summary, reproductive AEs in vaccinated individuals without COVID-19 illness were more frequent than in unvaccinated individuals with COVID-19 illness. A detailed and thorough follow-up is needed to better understand if pre-existing health conditions exacerbated vaccine-associated AEs.”

Hillary Clinton – who will never be president of the United States – joins Democrat party propagandist Michael Smerconish on XiNN and reveals the Democrats’ desire for “total control” over what the American people listen to and read. When asked a question about how we can reduce the amount of screen time kids are exposed to (around the 4:50 mark), Clinton goes off on a jag about censorship, saying in part, “We should be, in my view, repealing something called Section 230 which gave platforms on the internet immunity because they were thought to be just pass-throughs, that they shouldn’t be judged for the content that is posted. But we now know that is an overly simple view that if the platforms – whether it is Facebook or Twitter/X or Instagram or TikTok, whatever they are – if they don’t moderate and monitor the content, we lose total control. And it’s not just the social and psychological effects, it’s real harm. It’s child porn and threats of violence, things that are terribly dangerous… We need to remove the immunity from liability… and we need regulation.” Do you notice whenever these cretins bring up content moderation they always bring up child porn and violence? We already know these things are a problem and nothing has been done about it for years now. The power these people really want is the power to moderate opposing political views off the major platforms. That’s what “content moderation” is really about. Just last month, in fact, Clinton told Democrat party propagandist Rachel Maddow people should be “in some cases criminally charged” for posting supposed “misinformation.” Get bent, witch.

October 6 – A study is published at ScienceDirect titled, “Using double-debiased machine learning [DDML] to estimate the impact of Covid-19 vaccination on mortality and staff absences in elderly care homes.” The “results” section of the study reads in part, “our DDML estimates reveal some evidence that higher resident vaccination rates may have reduced Covid mortality in elderly care homes at least in the period of the initial rollout (i.e. up to about September 2021). There is little evidence of any reduction in mortality in the booster period or from staff vaccination. Further, we do not find evidence of a reduction in Covid deaths in elderly care homes relative to deaths in the broader community, despite the much higher vaccination rates in care homes.” Contained in the “discussion” section the authors even present evidence that the jabs are causing an increase in COVID mortality writing in part, “Even using DDML, we are unable to identify strong evidence that vaccination rates amongst care home staff reduced mortality or that resident vaccination reduced mortality during booster roll out period (from September 2021). Indeed, in the later period, we find some evidence that higher vaccination rates are associated with higher Covid mortality.” Now if that’s not “safe and effective” I don’t know what is… The researchers ultimately conclude, “Using standard panel data regression analysis and [DDML] techniques suggests both that vaccination had only a limited impact on care home mortality and that any impact was restricted to the initial rollout period of the vaccine. Our analysis casts doubt on the hypothesis that high rates of vaccination were a particularly important factor in reducing Covid mortality after the initial waves. In turn, this has implications for public policy relating to Covid vaccination. In particular, it may be appropriate to look again at the case for continuing to expend resources on offering regular booster vaccination doses to vulnerable populations such as care home residents.” I would say the shots never offered any benefit to anyone, but it’s nice to see mainline science finally catching up with reality.

October 9 – The Cleveland Clinic publishes a news release with the scary-sounding headline, “History of COVID-19 Doubles Long-term Risk of Heart Attack, Stroke and Death.” Fortunately for us, the headline is also very misleading. After looking at a group of 10K COVID patients from the UK and comparing them to 220,000 Brits who were (supposedly) never infected with COVID, researchers determined “[t]he risk of MACE [major adverse cardiovascular events] was elevated in COVID-19 cases at all levels of severity and to a greater extent in cases hospitalized for COVID-19.” The problem with this claim, however, is that it was only the subset of hospitalized patients who saw an increase in these adverse events in the years that followed infection. Out of the 10K patients previously infected with COVID, 20% were hospitalized, and it was mostly people in this group who saw the increase. The other 8K people experienced strokes, heart attacks and deaths at roughly the same rate as the control group. According to Alex Berenson, “350 of the non-hospitalized group had MACE events in three years, a rate of 4.3 percent. In contrast, 9,183 people in the control group of 217,730 suffered similar events, a rate of 4.2 percent. The authors did not disclose these facts anywhere in the paper. They are available only in the supplemental appendix. Even there they have to be reverse-engineered, as they are never provided openly. In the paper itself, the authors briefly mentioned the doubled risk for the entire group of 10,000. They used the phrase ‘all levels of severity’ to make it sound like the non-hospitalized group had double the risk, while the hospitalized group had four times. This wording is canny: ‘all levels of severity’ includes rather than excludes the hospitalized group, so authors are basically double-counting the hospitalized group’s risk to hide the lack of extra danger for everyone else… This was scientific and medical malpractice. Roughly 98 percent of all adults, and 90-95 percent of adults over 60, who get Covid are healthy enough to recover without hospitalization. Their risk – or lack thereof – should have been clearly disclosed.” Hat tip to Mr. Berenson and his Unreported Truths Substack.

The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals reinstates Montana House Bill 702, a state law that prohibits discrimination based on vaccination status. The court’s decision, which was written by Judge Daniel Bress, reads in part, “[t]he district court made several broad findings in support of its preemption determination. The court discussed the importance of vaccines in ‘creating a safe and effective health care environment.’ It further found that health care employers had immunocompromised patients and staff who were disabled within the meaning of the ADA [Americans with Disabilities Act] and who wanted other health care workers to be vaccinated. And the court cited testimony about the risk that unvaccinated health care employees may pose to ‘vulnerable and immunocompromised patients’ on account of ‘the high risk of serious injury due to infection.’ Based on these findings, the district court reasoned that HB 702 conflicted with the ADA: health care facilities needed to know employee vaccination status and to discriminate based on that status to make ADA-required accommodations for immunocompromised disabled persons. We conclude that the district court’s high-level findings show at most only ‘the existence of a hypothetical or potential conflict’ between the ADA and HB 702… that is, a perceived conflict that is too speculative on these facts to justify preemption. Plaintiffs have not demonstrated that HB 702 creates a genuine conflict with the ADA in any specific case, much less that HB 702 is facially invalid in all health care settings… The district court’s generalized factual findings about the importance of vaccines do not show an ‘irreconcilable conflict’ between HB 702 and the ADA or that HB 702 stands as an obstacle to the objectives of the ADA, whether facially or in any specific case… the evidence presented at trial – about the general importance of vaccines and the general health risks posed by unvaccinated workers – does not demonstrate anything more than that ‘in a hypothetical situation a private party’s compliance with’ HB 702 ‘might cause [it] to violate the’ ADA, which is insufficient to show a preemption-producing conflict between the two laws… plaintiffs have not shown that a specific accommodation or modification involving knowledge of employee vaccination status or discrimination based on vaccination status would be reasonable or necessary in any or all health care settings.” Also see this.
A meta-analysis is published at Taylor & Francis Online titled, “The efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine at different doses and courses for COVID-19 prevention: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.” After looking at 20 randomized controlled trials involving over 12,000 patients, researchers determined a “hydroxychloroquine dose of 200-400 mg for a duration of 5-8 weeks may moderately reduce the risk of COVID-19 with a relatively low risk of adverse events.” I took it when I last had COVID and it worked just fine.

October 10 – A research letter is published in JAMA titled, “Payments by Drug and Medical Device Manufacturers to US Peer Reviewers of Major Medical Journals.” The full text is behind a paywall, but according to HealthDay News, “David-Dan Nguyen, M.P.H., from the University of Toronto, and colleagues characterized payments by drug and medical device manufacturers to U.S. peer reviewers of major medical journals. The analysis included 1,962 U.S.-based physician peer reviewers (2020 to 2022) for The BMJ, JAMA, The Lancet, and the New England Journal of Medicine. The researchers found that 58.9 percent of identified peer reviewers received at least one industry payment, including general payments (54.0 percent) and research payments (31.8 percent). Overall, reviewers received $1.06 billion in industry payments during the study period, including $1.00 billion (94.0 percent) to individuals or their institutions and $64.18 million (6.0 percent) in general payments. Consulting fees accounted for $34.31 million, and speaking compensation unrelated to continuing medical education programs accounted for $11.80 million. Among reviewers receiving such payments, the median general payment was $7,614 and the median research payment was $153,173.” It seems pretty obvious that these industry payments are directly influencing what is written by the peer reviewers.

A study out of South Korea is published at PLOS One titled, “SARS-CoV2 mRNA vaccine intravenous administration induces myocarditis in chronic inflammation.” Researchers implanted mice with an osmotic pump which was used to administer different solutions to six different groups of mice. “The mice were immunized intramuscularly [IM] or intravenously [IV] with 10 μg of Omicron Spike mRNA vaccines encoding the sequence of spike protein from the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant… The immunization schedule consisted of two injections: an initial prime injection, followed by a boost injection, with a two-week interval between them. Once the immunization protocol was completed, the mice were euthanized two days post injection… after immunization and whole blood samples and tissues were collected.” The researchers found, “Myosin light chain7 and calcineurin, which is one of the cardiac hypertrophy and damage markers, were significantly increased in the heart tissue of mRNA-administered groups with or without LPS pump implantation… mRNA vaccine IV immunization induces inflammation and inflammatory cytokine production in the heart more than IM immunization. Moreover, the pericarditis and myocardium damage dramatically increased in the mRNA vaccine IV injection with the chronic inflammation condition… COVID-19 mRNA vaccines were associated with pericarditis at a rate of 12.6–24 cases per million following a second dose. The enhanced cardiac damage and myocarditis following mRNA vaccine administration in our chronic inflammatory mouse model raises important questions regarding the potential risks of mRNA vaccines in individuals with preexisting inflammatory conditions. Thus, the inflammatory milieu created by chronic inflammation may contribute to cardiac damage exacerbation following mRNA vaccine immunization. Here, we found that chronic inflammation increases the risk of adverse events induced by mRNA vaccines, particularly in the heart. Interestingly, the IV mRNA vaccine administration affects heart pericarditis and inflammation more. However, the mice experiment has a lot of limitations to show the relevance in the human model because nobody is getting IV administration for the mRNA vaccine. Dr. Knowlton commented that vaccines uptake into the bloodstream accidentally, which may cause systemic acute inflammation and myocarditis…” This last point I chose to include is a key one. Originally we were told the COVID mRNA “vaccines” would remain at the injection site in the arm for several days before getting flushed from the body. Almost immediately this proved to be false, and subsequent autopsies of previously-injected individuals have repeatedly shown spike proteins make their way to just about every organ in the body. There is absolutely no doubt they also find their way into the bloodstream, which ultimately leads to the heart and causes damage in the form of myocarditis/pericarditis. Unfortunately, while it should have been game, set, match for these awful products a long time ago, our loving medical “experts” are still recommending people stay “up-to-date” with the death jabs.
Democrat party propagandist Charlie Warzal has another boring diatribe published at The Atlantic, this one titled, “I’m Running Out of Ways to Explain How Bad This Is: What’s happening in America today is something darker than a misinformation crisis.” According to Warzal the genius, “a meaningful percentage of Americans have dissociated from reality.” Ah-ha, I see. Among the dissociated kooks they list are those who wonder whether hurricanes Milton and Helene were geoengineered (they probably were), those who question whether the federal recovery efforts in the aftermath of those storms has been adequate (it hasn’t… also see this and this), and of course people who question anything related to COVID. Towards the end of the snoozefest Warzal cites ~~another know-it-all twit~~ an information researcher from the University of Washington named Michael Caulfield who claims “[t]he primary use of ‘misinformation’ is not to change the beliefs of other people at all… the vast majority of misinformation is offered as a service for people to maintain their beliefs in face of overwhelming evidence to the contrary.” Oh, I see. I’ve been maintaining this website for years, publishing nearly 2,000 pages of writing that contain thousands upon thousands of hyperlinks in the process, not out of a desire to inform others and create a record of the many travesties carried out under the guise of COVID. No, that would make too much sense. I really do it because I want to believe a death cult runs the world, and will do anything to maintain this position… I got a tip for you, Charlie-boy, stop taking yourself so seriously. You know nothing.

October 11 – Slay News points out some fun facts about Pfizer’s COVID “vaccine…” Among the hundreds of “infections and infestations” listed as “reported potential side effects” of the COVID clot shot on the WHO’s VigiAccess website… is monkeypox. The list also includes lots of other fun ailments like cowpox and smallpox, gonorrhea, groin infection, genital infection, pancreas infection, kidney infection, fungal infection, genital herpes, measles, mumps, rubella (don’t worry, they have a nice little shot for those last three), hepatitis A/B/C, malaria, tuberculosis, eyelid boil, gingivitis and just about every other “itis” you could think of… But you’re a paranoid nutjob if you don’t want to inject this garbage into your body, let alone the bodies of children. To access the list go to the VigiAccess website and click the confirmation box to enter. Type “covid-19 vaccine” into the search bar and select the brand you want to look at (I selected Pfizer). Then scroll down to “infection and infestations” and click on it to access the full list – I had to hit “load more” at least a half dozen times to get to monkeypox. What a time to be alive.

A study is published in the Journal of Public Health and Emergency titled, “COVID-19 vaccination decisions and impacts of vaccine mandates: a cross sectional survey of healthcare workers in Ontario, Canada.” Researchers surveyed 468 Canadian healthcare workers to examine the impact vaccine mandates had on the decision to get vaccinated, as well as the impact the decision to get vaccinated had. The participants in the study consisted mostly of nurses and other medical support staff. Of the 86 respondents who replied to questions about their “vaccination decision and experience,” only 13% took the jab to protect themselves, their family or the community from severe COVID outcomes (hospitalization and death). More than 80% took the shot because of a mandate, with a work mandate being the number one reason (75%). Only 22% of those who took the shot experienced no adverse reactions, while the other 78% experienced side effects that ranged from mild to severe, with one person reporting a life-threatening reaction after the first dose. 31% said they were forced to take a second dose even after experiencing side effects following the first. Interestingly, only 16% of vaccinated respondents reported being satisfied with their decision to take the COVID clot shot, while almost 93% who refused the vaccination were happy they made that decision. The results section of the study reads, “Most respondents, with 16+ years of experience, were unvaccinated and terminated due to mandate non-compliance. Participants reported safety concerns about vaccination regardless of vaccination status, yet they rarely requested exemptions due to high rejection rates by employers. Unvaccinated workers reported satisfaction with their choices but faced significant negative impacts on their finances, mental health, and personal relationships. Conversely, vaccinated respondents were generally dissatisfied, often experiencing adverse events, and one-quarter felt coerced into receiving further doses. Further, a large minority of respondents reported issues such as underreporting of adverse events, poorer treatment of unvaccinated patients, and concerning protocol changes. Nearly half intended to leave the healthcare industry.” The study is only about 20 pages and reads fast.

October 12 – GBNews (UK) publishes ~~a pharmaceutical advertisement~~ an article titled, “New Covid variant surges: Spread being ‘monitored closely’ as officials tell Britons to take action.” The “surge” they’re talking about? “Hospitalisations have jumped to 4.55 per 100,000, up from 3.72 per 100,000 in the previous week. The North East is experiencing the highest hospital admission rates at 8.12 per 100,000, whilst those aged 85 and older face an alarming surge, reaching 52.48 per 100,000.” The “action” they’re telling Brits to take? (I think you already know…) “As winter approaches, experts are urging eligible individuals to get vaccinated against Covid-19, flu, and RSV to protect themselves and others from these seasonal threats.” Of course they are… Now seems like a good time to mention how back on February 17th, 2022 I pointed out “[t]he Week 7 COVID-19 Vaccine Surveillance Report out of the UK shows 84.7% of the country’s COVID deaths between January 17th and February 13th are among the vaccinated and boosted. Unvaxxed = 907 deaths, Vaxxed/Boosted = 4,657 deaths. I included those who died after receiving just one dose in the unvaxxed total. Take note of the fine print… they ‘expected’ this to be the case.” It was a scam then, and it’s still a scam now.

Table included in the Vaccine Surveillance Report.

Steve Kirsch draws our attention to a former NYC firefighter (now 38 years old) named O’Brian Pastrana. After taking the COVID “vaccine” the department forced him to take in 2021, Pastrana was injured and forced to retire. As a result, he was given a half-pension instead of the ¾ “line of duty” pension firefighters normally get when they’re injured on-the-job. What makes the story even more disturbing is the fact that before he took the second jab he had to go to the hospital twice to deal with the side effects from the first, but because he was told if he wasn’t “fully vaccinated” he would not be able to come back to work, he capitulated and took the second jab. According to what Pastrana told Kirsch, other firefighters who have noticed the sharp uptick in heart-related injuries and deaths are afraid to speak out because they don’t want to lose their job or the retirement they’ve been working towards, and so they remain silent. The linked article includes a 16-minute interview with Pastrana.

October 14 – The UK Telegraph reports on the death-cult-gone-wild situation that continues to unfold in Canada in an article titled, “I went for a mastectomy and they offered me assisted dying, Canadian cancer patient reveals.” The piece is about a 51-year-old woman who was offered government assistance to kill herself prior to both mastectomies she had (nine months apart), as well as in the recovery room following the second. According to the Telegraph, the woman was shocked by the Canadian healthcare system’s repeated attempts to help her end her life. “It floored me… [it was] the most vulnerable I’ve ever felt in my life. I was sitting in two surgical gowns, one frontways and one backwards, with a cap on my hair and booties on my feet. I was shivering and in a hard plastic chair and all alone in a hallway… The [doctor] sat down and went through all the scary things with me, then he asked, ‘Did you know about medical assistance in dying [MAID]?’ …I felt like a problem that needed to be [gotten] rid of instead of a patient in need of treatment. I don’t want to be asked if I want to die.” I’m sure the good folks over at the MAID program are busy right now stuffing government envelopes with holiday cards and suicide applications for all the useless eaters who got away…

October 15 – The German Newspaper Neue OZ reports “[m]ore than one in six Germans has experienced side effects in connection with a corona vaccination… According to the study, 17 percent of respondents answered ‘no’ when asked whether they had ‘tolerated the corona vaccinations well overall.’ Another 10 percent said they had not received a vaccination. Almost three quarters of respondents (73 percent) said they had no side effects. According to the survey, the majority of Germans also believe that a Bundestag committee of inquiry into the Corona crisis is unnecessary. 58 percent answered no to the question of whether such a form of investigation was ‘necessary.’ 40 percent answered yes to this question. A total of 1,002 people were interviewed for the Forsa survey on October 7 and 8. In designing the survey, our editorial team cooperated with the online magazine ‘Multipolar,’ which had won the release of the ‘RKI files’ [see July 23rd, 2024] in court, i.e. the crisis management protocols of the Robert Koch Institute.”

October 17 – During his 30-minute set at the 79th Annual Alfred E. Smith Memorial Foundation Dinner, comedian Jim Gaffigan made a poignant comment about NY Jets quarterback Aaron Rodgers and his refusal to take the COVID jab. After mentioning that Jets owner Woody Johnson was in attendance, Gaffigan joked (17:12 mark), “Ya know, in divisive times, sir, you are a shining example… If the head of Johnson & Johnson can sign an unvaxxed quarterback, maybe there is hope for this country.” If you have not yet seen it, Gaffigan’s entire routine is hilarious and worth taking the time to watch… President Trump’s speech was also very funny. Update (12/1/24): Gaffigan publishes a funny open letter at CBS titled, “How did this happen?” While both the title and the language used in the letter are meant to make readers think the piece is just another celebrity whining about Donald Trump winning the 2024 election, I can assure you it is not.

National Panhandler Radio reports on a man from Kentucky who woke up while surgeons were trying to harvest his organs. Back in 2021, after overdosing on drugs, Anthony Thomas Hoover II was taken to Baptist Health Hospital in Richmond, Kentucky and ultimately declared brain dead. While receiving a cardiac catheterization, a procedure used to check if the heart is healthy enough to be transplanted into someone who needs it, Hoover began “thrashing” around on the table. According to one of the organ preservationists at the hospital, the doctors sedated the patient after he woke up and planned to go ahead with the removal of his organs anyway. Earlier his sister Donna thought something might be wrong when she saw her brother open his eyes and look around as he was being wheeled into the operating room, but she was told this was just a “common reflex.” The incident is now under investigation by the state’s attorney general’s office as well as the federal government’s Health Resources and Services Administration. Pro tip: Try to avoid the hospital at all costs.

October 18 – Steve Kirsch publishes an article at his Substack about the rise in the age-standardized mortality rate in long term care facilities in Santa Clara County, Commiefornia. According to the information contained on the county’s open data portal, COVID fatality rates in these facilities more than doubled after the rollout of the COVID “vaccines.” Kirsch has reached out to the county’s health department for an explanation, but – like always – they are unlikely to respond. Update (11/6/24): Kirsch files a complaint with the Santa Clara Board of Supervisors due to the Health Department’s refusal to explain why they continue to recommend COVID “vaccines” when the data – their data – shows they have only lead to more COVID cases and a sharp increase in deaths at the county’s long-term care facilities. He has also vowed to take legal action against the supervisors if they refuse to investigate the matter. Update 2 (11/14/24): Kirsch shares the email response he received from Steve Preminger, the county’s ~~head douchebag~~ Director of Civic and Community Engagement. The email reads in part, “Rather than addressing the inaccurate assertions that you made about the County’s public health information on our website, let me reiterate the County’s commitment to provide information based on proven, well-documented science. As I previously noted to you, the County has already responded to your requests and has nothing else to add. We need to devote our limited resources by following sound public health and CDC-based science. So, rather than devote staff time responding to this or future communications, let me close how I finished my last email to you July 12, which is to say that we will not be responding further to your Covid vaccine-related questions.” That doesn’t seem like “community engagement” to me. Wow. Update 3 (12/2/24): Kirsch publishes another article detailing how the clot shots have ravaged his home county of Santa Clara, this time showing that all-cause mortality increased sharply among the elderly (50% over the baseline number) in the first quarter of 2021.

Image included in the linked Kirsch article.

October 21 – Kirsch publishes another article at his Substack titled, “Over 200,000 Americans killed by the COVID vaccine: 10 methods, same answer.” Check it out if you want to see the details.

October 22 – The Defender reports on a court in the Netherlands ruling last week (October 16th) that Bill Gates, along with Pfizer CEO Albert Bourla, former Dutch PM Mark Rutte and several members of the country’s “Outbreak Management Team,” will have to face seven people in court next month because of injuries they suffered after taking the COVID “vaccine.” According to Dutch attorney Meike Terhorst, “In general, COVID-19 court cases have been very unsuccessful in the Netherlands. There is a slim chance it will be successful… I think most judges support the COVID-19 vaccination agenda and will find it hard to believe the vaccinations have caused injuries. So, we have a long way to go, regardless of the case.” As of now, Gates will have to pay the plaintiff’s legal fees (about $1200) and appear in court to defend himself on November 27th when the case proceeds. To be clear, this is not a criminal case. It is a civil trial attempting to hold Gates and others accountable for misleading the public about COVID and the safety and efficacy of the experimental COVID jabs. Also see this.

Bill Gates wearing a non-threatening lavender sweater.

How dopey are Canadians? The Canadian Brainwashing Corporation reports British Columbia recently broke a 1-day vaccination record by administering 82K vaccinations on October 15th (50K flu shots and 32K COVID jabs). The death cult has really sunk their claws deep into Canada. It is of the utmost importance that more people living there begin to step up and fight back.

October 23 – The New Zealand Daily Telegraph reports on the data they received from Health NZ through a FOIA request showing a whopping “188% rise in the 3 month mortality risk among the 12-19 age group following mRNA vaccination and an 83% rise in the 20-30 age group.” According to the linked article, the “12-19 and 20-30 age brackets had a disproportionate mortality risk in the 3 months following vaccination. This may have contributed to the deaths of as many as 40 teenagers and 70 people in their twenties. It greatly increases the likelihood that a number of unexplained or unexpected deaths noted among the younger age brackets occurring in 2021 and 2022 were caused by mRNA Covid vaccination. By implication the health, including long term health, of thousands more may have been adversely affected.” The data raises serious concerns about the long term health of those injected with the COVID clot shots, as well as what the New Zealand government knew about the risks associated with these jabs, when they knew it, and why they never informed the public about them.

National Panhandler Radio in Boise, Idaho reports the Southwest Idaho Board of Health voted yesterday in favor (4-3) of pulling the COVID clot shots from all health clinics in the district, so people living there will no longer be able to have themselves injected with deadly poison. According to the panhandlers, “The board vote followed anti-vaccine presentations from multiple doctors widely accused of spreading conspiracy theories and misinformation, including Idaho pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole. Other presenters joined by teleconference, including Dr. Peter McCullough, a Texas-based cardiologist who had his medical certifications threatened by the American Board of Internal Medicine in 2022, pediatrician Dr. Renata Moon, who has sued Washington State University over free speech when the school did not renew her contract after an appearance before a 2022 U.S. Senate panel questioning vaccines, and Dr. James Thorp, an OB/GYN who was featured in the conspiracy-laden and widely debunked documentary ‘Died Suddenly.’” Now that the worm seems to finally be turning, the death cult and their minions can only resort to demonizing and insulting those opposed to them. For the record, Cole, McCullough, Moon and Thorpe are all awesome, and the film Died Suddenly has never been debunked. Outlets like NPR write stupid shit like this in the hope that it will deter people from checking out their excellent work…
A federal jury decides in favor of six BART employees (Bay Area Rapid Transit system in San Francisco, CA) who were fired back in 2021 for refusing to comply with the agency’s unscientific COVID clot shot mandate. While BART had initially granted vaccine exemptions to some, these six individuals were ultimately denied accommodations on religious grounds, and on November 24, 2021 – the day before Thanksgiving – they were notified that their exemption requests had been denied. The former BART employees will now be receiving over $1M each ($7.8M total) despite the agency being more than $350M in the red. Also see this.

October 24 – A study is published at Cambridge Core titled, “The impact of COVID-19 status and vaccine type following the first dose on acute heart disease: A nationwide retrospective cohort study in South Korea.” Using data from the country’s National Health Insurance Service COVID-19 database, researchers “ analysed heart disease risk, including acute cardiac injury, acute myocarditis, acute pericarditis, cardiac arrest, and cardiac arrhythmia, in relation to vaccine type and COVID-19 within 21 days after the first vaccination date, employing Cox proportional hazards models with time-varying covariates. This study included 3,350,855 participants.” After looking at the data, researchers concluded, “[i]ndividuals who received mRNA vaccines had a higher risk of acute heart disease compared to those who received other vaccines… The risk of acute heart disease was higher among individuals who had COVID-19 within 21 days after the first vaccination than among those whom this was not registered… Younger individuals in their 20s and 30s, when compared with older individuals in their 70s and above, exhibited higher risks of acute heart disease… The younger the age of mRNA vaccine recipients, the higher the risk of acute heart disease… Particularly, among mRNA vaccine recipients, compared to individuals aged 70 and above, those in their 20s showed the highest HR [hazard ratio], followed by those in their 30s…. Additionally, elevated risk was also observed among individuals in their 40s and 60s… However, this increased risk was not observed among those in their 50s… The study results showed that the risk of acute heart disease was higher among individuals who received mRNA vaccines compared to those who received other types of vaccines… we observed that individuals vaccinated with mRNA vaccines had a higher risk of acute heart diseases compared to those who received other vaccines, and those with COVID-19 within 21 days after the first vaccination had a higher risk than those without. Furthermore, the interaction effect between the type of vaccine and age group revealed that among individuals who received mRNA vaccines, younger age was associated with a higher risk of acute heart disease.”

Journalist Paul Thacker publishes leaked meeting notes from the Center for Countering Digital Hate (CCDH), a shady British-American group of leftist shitpigs obsessed with censoring any and all information that goes against the agenda of the death cult. The notes taken during a January 8th, 2024 meeting read in part (“IA: RFK – black ops being set up to look at RFK. Nervousness about the impact of him on the election. We may be asked to comment, particularly from antivaxx [sic].” “IA” stands for Imran Ahmed, the ~~head shitpig~~ CEO of the privately-funded NGO. For more on his moronic “black ops” comment and the work this pathetic, freedom-hating group does see this and this. A couple of other interesting things contained in the leaked meeting notes include: 1) On January 8th (page 29), Ahmed also said, “Mark Ruffalo had retweeted an image of Trump on Epstein’s plane, which was AI generated. Anxious that he has counted himself out as a voice.” LMAO. Only a leftist shitpig like Ahmed would take anything Mark Ruffalo has to say seriously… 2) Found on multiple pages of the leaked documents is “Kill Musk’s Twitter.” It is listed as the first “annual goal,” with the third being “Trigger EU & UK regulatory action.” They sure seem like nice people, don’t they? Also see this.

October 26 – Tell me it’s the vaccine without saying it’s the vaccine: A study is published in the Journal of Epidemiology titled, “Changes in mortality during the COVID-19 pandemic in Japan: descriptive analysis of national health statistics up to 2022.” Using “official Vital Statistics from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare to assess the impact of the pandemic on mortality trends,” the study found that, “[a]mong men, the annual all-cause ASMR [age-standardized mortality rates] per 100,000 people increased from 1356.3 in 2021 to 1437.8 in 2022 (6.0% increase). Among women, the annual all-cause ASMR increased from 722.1 in 2021 to 785.8 in 2022 (6.5% increase). Compared with the period 2020 to 2021, COVID-19, senility, heart disease, malignant neoplasms (for women) and ‘other causes not classified as major causes’ substantially contributed to the increase in all-cause ASMR from 2021 to 2022.” COVID “vaccine” uptake in Japan was among the highest in the world, hitting a “fully vaccinated” rate of about 75% by the fall of 2021. The blind spot so many people working in the field of medicine have when it comes to these shots is as frustrating as it is baffling.

October 28 – Tell me it’s the vaccine without saying it’s the vaccine: An article is published in the European Journal of Public Health titled, “Excess all-cause mortality in 21 countries during 2022: COVID-19 impact by C-MOR project.” The abstract reads in part, “Excess mortality was calculated by comparing the weekly 2022 age-standardized mortality rates per 100,000 population against a baseline mortality, estimated using historical data from 2015-2019. Excess cumulative mortality for 2022 was found in all 21 countries. The excess mortality for the total population varied between 8.6 and 116.2, with the minimum excess belonging to Peru and the maximum to Georgia. Australia, Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, Estonia, Georgia, Greece, Israel, and Norway showed a higher excess in 2022 than in 2020, while Australia, Austria, Cyprus, Denmark, Israel, Italy, Norway, Spain, and Sweden also showed a higher excess in 2022 than in 2021. Mauritius showed a significant excess mortality for the first time in 2022. For all countries, but Australia, the % of COVID-19 deaths out of all deaths decreased in 2022 compared to 2021. Contrary to the ‘harvesting effect’, which would expect a decline in mortality rates post-pandemic, our results underscore a sustained excess mortality throughout 2022… All countries investigated experienced continued all-cause excess mortality during 2022, compared to pre-pandemic years. For most, excess mortality in 2022 was higher than in 2021 and 2020.” On a side note, while scrolling through the other articles looking for this one, I couldn’t help noticing that this journal was absolutely teeming with crackpot nonsense. For example, I found an article titled, “Vaccine conspiracy beliefs are the main determinant of adult vaccine hesitancy,” which concluded, “The vaccine conspiracy beliefs play a major role in the development of VH [vaccine hesitancy]. The interventions aimed at the change of anti-vaccination attitudes should address the problem of widespread conspiracy beliefs.” You see, vaccine hesitancy is not caused by the fact that these horrible injections are killing and maiming people at rates never seen before… It’s caused by kooky conspiracy theorists!

Michael Capuzzo publishes a lengthy excerpt from Naomi Wolf and Amy Kelly’s new book “The Pfizer Papers.” You should definitely take the time to check it out. As for me, I will be asking Santa for a copy this Christmas…
The Associated Presstitutes reports French news outlet Le Monde has “found that the highly confidential movements of U.S. President Joe Biden, presidential rivals Donald Trump and Kamala Harris, and other world leaders can be easily tracked online through a fitness app that their bodyguards use… Le Monde also found Strava users among the security staff for French President Emmanuel Macron and Russian President Vladimir Putin. In one example, Le Monde traced the Strava movements of Macron’s bodyguards to determine that the French leader spent a weekend in the Normandy seaside resort of Honfleur in 2021. The trip was meant to be private and wasn’t listed on the president’s official agenda.” Technology is, and always will be, a double-edged sword.

October 29 – Wide Awake Media shares video of German EU Parliament Member, Christine Anderson, excoriating the President of the European Commission, Ursula von der Leyen, to her face. Anderson told the corrupt witch, “Ms. Von der Leyen, you are a disgrace to any democracy. Your five years have been more than enough. ‘Green Deal,’ ‘Fit for Fifty-Five,’ all these programs – they are ruining the lives of citizens in the EU. Deindustrialization, price explosion, abolition of freedom and democracy, censorship, harassment of citizens – that is your policy Ms. Von der Leyen! Shame on you! Shame on you! You negotiated a contract worth billions with your friend from Pfizer, for a product that was useless at best, harmful at worst, and in many cases even fatal. Once again, you should be ashamed of yourselves. Just the day before yesterday the ECJ [European Court of Justice] ruled that you should not have kept the contents of the vaccine contracts secret. You are the subject of several corruption investigations. If you had a shred of decency in you, you wouldn’t be running for office in the first place. But you have no decency… Ms. Von der Leyen you are the president of the commission, not the president of corruption. You should not be re-elected, you should be chased out of the Parliament and out of office in disgrace. That’s where you belong.”

October 30 – Co-chair of the Trump Transition Team, Howard Lutnick, joins Democrat party propagandist Kaitlan Collins on XiNN to discuss some of the people President Trump may appoint to important positions in a potential second term. When she tries to question whether or not it would be a good idea for President Trump to hand control of the health agencies over to RFK Jr. (around the 5:00 mark), Lutnick uses it as an opportunity to enlighten the network’s braindead audience. Lutnick said, “… when he [RFK] was born we had three vaccines and autism was 1 in 10,000. Now a baby’s born with 76 vaccines because in 1986 they waived product liability for vaccines. And here’s the best one: they started paying people at the NIH. They pay them a piece of the money for the vaccines companies (Collins attempts to jump in and argue). Let me finish. And so all of these vaccines came out without product liability. So what happened? Autism is now 1 in 34.” Hearing these facts, as well as allowing them to be said on the air, causes Collins to take a defensive position, and she responds by saying, “Neither of us are doctors. Vaccines are safe. RFK, I mean…” When he cuts in and asks her why she thinks vaccines are safe, she can only answer by saying (with a stupid smile on her face), “They’re proven. Kids get them and they’re fine… They’re proven scientifically, they go through rigorous amounts of testing.” This is the moment Collins exposed herself as a know-nothing propagandist. Instead of engaging in a factual debate or referencing science in some way, she just makes blanket statements about how safe and effective vaccines are without addressing anything Lutnick just got through saying. The dopey leftist host went on to add, “Vaccines don’t cause autism, which is what RFK pushes. This is why people are concerned that he could get a job at HHS.” Maybe she should read RFK’s book The Real Anthony Fauci. Not only would she learn that many of the pharmaceutical products widely consumed in America undergo very little – if any – meaningful testing, but she would probably become an RFK fan in no time… But that will likely never happen because, for all intents and purposes, Big Pharma is her boss.

While we’re on the topic of RFK, XiNN’s Fake Yapper also decided to take a few shots at him while on air today speaking to his dwindling audience. After playing a clip of Trump telling his rally-goers he was going to let RFK “go wild on health” and another of RFK confirming that Trump has indeed promised him a significant role in regulating the regulators, the Democrat party propagandist told his braindead viewers, “Just a reminder RFK Jr. has no medical license, and has made wildly inaccurate claims about all sorts of medicines including childhood vaccines… Actual medical professionals are sounding the alarm about RFK Jr. playing any sort of role in healthcare with this country.” Cry more, bitch.

October 31 – Vice Presidential nominee JD Vance makes an appearance on the Joe Rogan Experience podcast. During the 2-hour interview Rogan brings up the issue of pharmaceutical companies being allowed to advertise on television (57:20 mark), which led to a conversation about the lack of Big Pharma accountability in America and ultimately Vance discussing the side effects he experienced after taking the COVID jab. Vance said in part (1:06:40 mark), “So I took the vax, and you know I haven’t been boosted or anything, but the moment where I really started to get red-pilled on the whole vax thing was the sickest that I have been in the last 15 years, by far, was when I took the vaccine. And you know I’ve had COVID at this point five times, I was in bed for two days, my heart was racing, I was like – the fact that we’re not even allowed to talk about that even, you know, I had no like ‘serious injury’ (making air quotes), but even the fact that we’re not even allowed to talk about the fact that I was as sick as I’ve ever been for two days, and the worst COVID experience I had was like a sinus infection, I’m not really willing to trade that… a lot of people I know they talk about [how] the second shot that they got of the vaccine was [what] really made them really, really sick. Well that’s a side effect, and not a side effect that we even talk about enough in this country.” The entire interview was very good and touches on a lot of different topics. It should also be pointed out that both Commie-la Harris and Tampon Tim Walz were also invited on the podcast, but demanded Rogan interview them in another location… Which was them saying “no” without actually saying “no.” The real reason they did not take him up on his offer is because they are unintelligent twits who can only handle short, scripted interviews with friendly “journalists” for the sole purpose of creating sound bites. Sad!