May 3, 2023 – The third International COVID Summit (part 1/part 2) kicks off at the European Parliament building in Brussels, Belgium. During the 8-hour summit, the founder of the asset management firm M⋅CAM, David Martin, spoke about coronaviruses being the jumping-off point for the medicalization of society. Martin said in part (13:08 mark of part 1), “It is a particularly interesting location for me to be sitting today. Given that over a decade ago, I sat in this very chair right here in the European Union Parliament. And at that time, I warned the world of what was coming. During that conversation… on whether Europe should adopt the United States’ policy of allowing for the patents on biologically derived materials… I urged people around the world that the weaponization of nature against humanity had dire consequences. For an unfortunately long time, I sit here today with that unfortunate line that I don’t like to say, which [is] ‘I told you so.’ But the fact of the matter is we’re here not for a reprisal on past decisions. We’re here to actually once again come to the face of the human condition and ask the question: who do we want to be? What do we want humanity to look like? … My role today is to set the stage for this conversation in a historical context, because this did not come in the last three years, this did not come in the last five or six years. This actually is an ongoing question that probably began here in Europe in the early stages of the mid-1900s – but certainly by 1913/1914, this conversation started right here in Central Europe.
“The pandemic that we alleged to have happened in the last few years also did not happen overnight. In fact, the very specific pandemic using coronavirus began in a very different time… Most of you don’t know that coronavirus as a model of a pathogen was isolated in 1965. Coronavirus was identified in 1965 as one of the first infectious, replicable viral models that could be used to modify a series of other experiences of the human condition that was isolated once upon a time associated with the common cold. But what’s particularly interesting about its isolation in 1965 was that it was immediately identified as a pathogen that could be used and modified for a whole host of reasons… [and] in 1966, the very first CoV coronavirus model was used as a transatlantic biological experiment in human manipulation… This is not an overnight thing. This is actually something that’s been long in the making. A year before I was born. We had the first transatlantic coronavirus data sharing experiment between the United States and the United Kingdom. And in 1967, the year I was born, we did the first human trials on inoculating people with modified coronavirus. Isn’t that amazing? 56 years ago, the overnight success of a pathogen that’s been 56 years in engineering… the common cold was turned into a chimera in the 1970s, and in 1975, 1976 and 1977, we started figuring out how to modify coronavirus by putting it into different animals – pigs and dogs. And not surprisingly, by the time we got to 1990, we found out that coronavirus as an infectious agent was an industrial problem for two primary industries, the industries of dogs and pigs. Dog breeders and [pig breeders] found that coronavirus created gastrointestinal problems, and that became the basis for Pfizer’s first spike protein vaccine patent filed – are you ready for this – in 1990. Did you hear what I just said? … Pfizer. 1990. The very first spike protein vaccine for coronavirus… We found that out in 1990 and filed the first patents on vaccines in 1994 for the spike protein of coronavirus…
“Clearly, Pfizer, the organization that has not bought the votes in this chamber, in every chamber of every government around the world – not that Pfizer, certainly they wouldn’t have had anything to do with this. But, oh yes they did. And in 1990, they found out that there was a problem with vaccines. They didn’t work. You know why they didn’t work? It turns out the coronavirus is a very malleable model. It transforms and it changes and it mutates over time. And as a matter of fact, every publication on vaccines for coronavirus from 1990 until 2018, every single publication concluded that coronavirus escapes the vaccine impulse because it modifies and mutates too quickly for vaccines to be effective… Following the science is their own indictment of their own programs that said it doesn’t work… And there are thousands of publications to that effect, not a few hundred and not paid for by pharmaceutical companies… All of them show vaccines do not work on coronavirus. That’s the science. And that science has never been disputed. But then we had an interesting development in 2002. And this date is most important because in 2002, the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill patented and I quote, ‘an infectious replication defective clone of coronavirus.’ Listen to those words. Infectious replication defective. What does that phrase actually mean? For those of you not familiar with language, let me unpack it for you. Infectious replication defective means a weapon. It means something meant to target an individual, but not have collateral damage to other individuals. That’s what infectious replica and defective means. And that patent was filed in 2002 on work funded by NIAID’s Anthony Fauci from 1999 to 2002, and that work patented at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill mysteriously preceded SARS 1.0 by a year. ‘Dave, are you suggesting that SARS 1.0 wasn’t from a wet market in Wuhan? Are you suggesting it might have come from a laboratory in the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill?’ No, I’m not suggesting it. I’m telling you, that’s the facts.
“We engineered SARS. SARS is not a naturally occurring phenomenon. The naturally occurring phenomenon is called the common cold. It’s called influenza-like illness. It’s called gastroenteritis. That’s the naturally occurring coronavirus. SARS is the research developed by humans weaponizing a life system model to actually attack human beings. And they patented it in 2002. And in 2003 – giant surprise – the CDC filed the patent on coronavirus isolated from humans in violation, once again, of biological and chemical weapons treaties and laws that we have in the United States. And I’m very precise on this. The United States likes to talk about its rights and everything else, and the rule of law, and all the nonsense we like to talk about. But we don’t ratify treaties about – I don’t know – defending humans. We conspicuously avoid that. We actually have a great track record of advocating for human rights and then denying them when it comes to actually being part of the international community, which is a slightly problematic thing. But let’s get something very clear – when the CDC in April of 2003 filed the patent on SARS coronavirus isolated from humans, what did they do? They downloaded a sequence from China and filed a patent on it in the United States. Any of you familiar with biological and chemical weapons treaties knows that’s a violation. That’s a crime. That’s not an innocent oops. That’s a crime. And the United States Patent Office went as far as to reject that patent application on two occasions until the CDC decided to bribe the patent office to override the patent examiner to ultimately issue the patent in 2007 on SARS coronavirus. But let’s not let that get away from us because it turns out that the RT-PCR, which was the test that we allegedly were going to use to identify the risks associated with coronavirus, was actually identified as a bioterrorism threat by me in the European Union sponsored events in 2002 and 2003 – 20 years ago. That happened here in Brussels and across Europe. In 2005, this particular pathogen was specifically labeled as a bioterrorism and bioweapon platform technology described as such. That’s not my terminology that I’m applying to it, it was actually described as a bioweapons platform technology in 2005, and from 2005 onwards it was actually a biowarfare enabling agent – its official classification from 2005 forward. I don’t know if that sounds like public health to you. Does it?
“Biological warfare-enabling technology – that feels like not public health. That feels like not medicine, that feels like a weapon designed to take out humanity. That’s what it feels like. And it feels like that because that’s exactly what it is. We have been lured into believing that EcoHealth Alliance and DARPA and all of these organizations are what we should be pointing to, but we’ve been specifically requested to ignore the facts that over $10B have been funneled through black operations, through the check of Anthony Fauci… and it’s been going on since 2005. Our gain-of-function moratorium – the moratorium that was supposed to freeze any efforts to do gain-of-function research – conveniently in the fall of 2014 the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill received a letter from NIAID saying that while the gain-of-function moratorium on coronavirus in vivo should be suspended, because their grants had already been funded, they received an exemption. Did you hear what I just said? A biological weapons lab facility at the University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill received an exemption from the gain-of-function moratorium so that by 2016 we could publish the journal article that said SARS coronavirus is poised for human emergence in 2016. And what, you might ask Dave, was the coronavirus poised for human emergence? It was WIV1 – Wuhan Institute of Virology virus one – poised for human emergence in 2016 at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. Such that by the time we get to 2017 and 2018, the following phrase entered into common parlance among the community. ‘There is going to be an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen.’ The operative word, obviously, in that phrase, the word release… [and] it was in September of 2019 that the world was informed that we were going to have an accidental or intentional release of a respiratory pathogen. So that by September 2020, there would be a worldwide acceptance of a universal vaccine template… The intent was to get the world to accept a universal vaccine template, and the intent was to use coronavirus to get there… A key driver is the media, and the economics will follow the hype… Investors will respond if they see profit at the end of the process. Sounds like public health? Sounds like the best of humanity? No, ladies and gentlemen, this was premeditated domestic terrorism stated at the proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences in 2015… This is an act of biological and chemical warfare perpetrated on the human race, and it was admitted to in writing this was a financial heist, and a financial fraud…
“Nature was hijacked. This whole story started in 1965, when we decided to hijack a natural model and decided to start manipulating it. Science was hijacked when the only questions that could be asked were questions authorized under the patent protection of the CDC, the FDA, the NIH and their equivalent organizations around the world. We didn’t have independent science. We had hijacked science. And unfortunately, there was no moral oversight – in violation of all of the codes that we stand for. There was no independent, financially disinterested, independent review board ever impaneled around coronavirus… Our job today is to say no more gain of function research period. No more weaponization of nature, period. And most importantly, no more corporate patronage of science for their own self-interest unless they assume 100% product liability for every injury and every death that they maintain…”
Other notable speakers included Dr. Pierre Kory (2:24:20 mark of part 1), Dr. Byram Bridle (2:56:10 mark of part 1), Dr. Harvey Risch (3:17:25 mark of part 1), European Union Parliament Member Christine Anderson (14:48 mark of part 2), Dr. Guiseppe Tritto (31:00 mark of part 2), Dr. Ryan Cole (2:19:05 mark of part 2), and Maria Gutschi (3:19:50 mark of part 2). Everyone who spoke at the summit did a fantastic job.