January 2 – A study is published at medRxiv titled, “Metformin mitigates insulin signaling variations induced by COVID-19 vaccine boosters in type 2 diabetes.” After analyzing the condition of the 155 participants both before and after they took a COVID booster jab, the authors determined the shots “exacerbated risks of glucose intolerance and insulin resistance after the booster shots of COVID-19 mRNA vaccination in pre-diabetic patients and diabetic patients, as revealed by the significant elevation of HbA1c, homeostatic model assessment for insulin resistance (HOMA-IR), triglyceride (TG) and triglyceride-glucose index (TyG)… About 61.1% of diabetic subjects had impairment of insulin sensitivity according to the HOMA-IR index and about 66.7% of diabetic subjects had increased risks of cardiovascular complications according to the TyG index. Moreover, correlation analysis revealed HOMA-IR 103 index is positively correlated with a series of immune responses including SARS-CoV-2 spike protein, SARS-CoV-2 spike (Trimer) IgG, and neutralizing abilities of SARS-CoV-2 protein after COVID-19 vaccination. These results suggest that the booster shot of mRNA COVID-19 vaccine impairs glucose control and aggravates insulin resistance in human subjects with type 2 diabetes.” The scientists also performed a glucose tolerance test on mice who were given Pfizer mRNA jabs and they “exhibited impaired glucose tolerance” after their fourth dose. The tests also showed “serum triglyceride, but not FBG, serum insulin level or bodyweight, [was] significantly elevated in mice with weekly COVID-19 vaccination… indicating an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases and metabolic disorders.” Yet the pushers keep pushing…
January 4 – Chinese scientists publish a study revealing they have been experimenting with a mutant COVID strain which – in just 7-8 days – killed 100% of the “humanized” mice that were exposed to it. The virus, which is known as GX_P2V, is a mutated version of a coronavirus discovered in Malaysian pangolins back in 2017. According to the NY Post, “GX_P2V had infected the lungs, bones, eyes, tracheas and brains of the dead mice, the last of which was severe enough to ultimately cause the death of the animals. In the days before their deaths, the mice had quickly lost weight, exhibited a hunched posture, and moved extremely sluggishly. Most eerie of all, their eyes turned completely white the day before they died.” And the point of this is what exactly?
January 10 – A study is published in Neurochemical Research titled, “Prenatal Exposure to COVID-19 mRNA Vaccine BNT162b2 Induces Autism-Like Behaviors in Male Neonatal Rats: Insights into WNT and BDNF Signaling Perturbations.” The study “aimed to investigate the gene expression of WNT, brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels, specific cytokines, m-TOR expression, neuropathology, and autism-related neurobehavioral outcomes in a rat model” by injecting pregnant rats with a Pfizer/BioNTech COVID vaccine and studying the effects the shots had on offspring during gestation. The findings revealed “that the mRNA BNT162b2 vaccine significantly alters WNT gene expression and BDNF levels in both male and female rats, suggesting a profound impact on key neurodevelopmental pathways. Notably, male rats exhibited pronounced autism-like behaviors, characterized by a marked reduction in social interaction and repetitive patterns of behavior. Furthermore, there was a substantial decrease in neuronal counts in critical brain regions, indicating potential neurodegeneration or altered neurodevelopment. Male rats also demonstrated impaired motor performance, evidenced by reduced coordination and agility.” Also see this interesting article by Igor Chudov.
January 11 – A study is published in Nature titled, “Depopulation and associated challenges for US cities by 2100.” Researchers at the University of Illinois studied population trends from 2000, 2010 and 2020 to determine what the US population will be in the year 2100. The study’s conclusion reads in part, “The results revealed that about half of the 30,000 US cities are likely to lose population by 2100. As depopulation is a multifaceted phenomenon that brings with it social, economic and environmental challenges, having half of the cities depopulating is consequential. Some of the consequences faced by depopulating cities include maintaining roadways in an adequate condition, offering travel alternatives for people who cannot drive, proving [sic] clean water, maintaining enough pressure in water distribution systems, maintaining sanitary and stormwater sewers, providing electricity safely and reliably, managing solid waste properly and providing affordable housing options… What is certain is that an important cultural shift in planning and engineering communities is needed, away from conventional, growth-based planning, to accommodate a dramatic demographic shift.” The study also notes “cities like Long Island (NY) and those around Chicago (IL), which are experiencing population loss, may still grow thanks to immigration.” I guess it would have sounded weird if they wrote “thanks to illegal immigration.”
January 18 – A preprint study published in medRxiv shows repeated doses of mRNA vaccine makes people less capable of fighting off repeat infections. The study compared three groups of patients – those who took three doses of the Pfizer jab, those who took three doses of Moderna, and those who took three doses of Novavax. For the patients who took the Pfizer and Moderna jabs an IgG4 antibody “switch” occurred, meaning their bodies began allowing pathogens to proceed unfettered. Unlike other antibodies, IgG4 antibodies ignore the contagions they were made to detect through vaccination. The Novavax vaccine does not contain mRNA and did not cause this “switch” to occur (see my June 7, 2022 breakdown for more info on the Novavax shot). Hat tip to Igor Chudov for helping me stay up on all this stuff and, as always, breaking the gobbledygook down into layman’s terms.
Diagram from the study linked above.
Chart from a 2023 study out of the Cleveland Clinic showing more doses of the COVID vax equals more cases of COVID.
February 5 – A study out of Japan is published in the Journal of Computational Social Science titled, “Anti-vaccine rabbit hole leads to political representation: the case of Twitter in Japan.” The study found “anti-vaxxers are more politically involved than other Twitter users interested in vaccines. They include both rightists and leftists, but leftists are dominant… A comparison of users who were consistently anti-vaccine before the pandemic with those who turned anti-vaccine afterwards indicates that the former followed anti-vaccine influencers in the early stages of their Twitter use, suggesting they originally had an interest in vaccines and a social influence on Twitter. They were also more politically interested than new anti-vaxxers, leaning more to the left than to the right. In contrast, new anti-vaxxers are less politically engaged but have a particular interest in health, spiritual and naturalist discourses, and conspiracy theories. The study suggests that the emergence of new anti-vaxxers was not primarily driven by political concerns. Rather, their preexisting interests in conspiracy theories, spiritual discourse, and health acted as a gateway to their adoption of anti-vaccine attitudes during the pandemic. Owing to the high congruence between anti-vaccine sentiment and conspiracy theories and alternative health practices, these individuals incorporated their anti-vaccine beliefs into their original belief systems, resulting in their identification as anti-vaxxers… To summarize, our findings suggest that individuals without anti-vaccine beliefs can be exposed to anti-vaccine tweets if they possess a strong focus on health or spirituality and are driven by pandemic-related anxiety. As a result, they may be inclined to support a political party that combines anti-vaccine mixed conspiracy theories with spiritual discourses.” Of course! It’s not the fact that the “vaccine” isn’t really a vaccine, or that it never prevented the transmission of COVID, or that it’s killed and maimed countless people the world over, or that people had their lives ruined for refusing to take it… It’s my willingness to believe conspiracy theories that is driving my anti-vax beliefs! Even more disturbing are the examples of some of the “anti-vax” Tweets contained in the downloadable supplementary information document – which are just normal people describing their experiences… For example, one of the Tweets reads, “I will never forget how several hospitals turned my mother away after she became ill from the vaccine. She cried beside herself and begged for help, not only experiencing physical pain but emotional pain as well. We urgently need an outpatient clinic for vaccine adverse reactions and aftereffects! Please spread the word by using the hashtag #vaccineadversereactions and RT!” The researchers who wrote this study are a pack of heartless assholes.
February 7 – According to a study conducted by Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health regarding Big Pharma advertising, “the share of promotional spending allocated to consumer advertising was on average 14.3 percentage points higher for drugs with low added benefit compared to drugs with high added benefit. The analysis also revealed that the majority – 68 percent or 92 of the 135 drugs included in the analysis – of the top-selling prescription drugs sold in 2020 were rated as offering low added benefit.” The article also makes note of the fact that the US and New Zealand are the only countries that allow Big Pharma to advertise their products directly to consumers – which is a bad idea in my opinion.
February 12 – A study is published at the Elsevier website titled, “COVID-19 vaccines and adverse events of special interest: A multinational Global Vaccine Data Network (GVDN) cohort study of 99 million vaccinated individuals.” The study focused on the frequency of thirteen adverse events of special interest (AESI) that occurred up to 42 days after vaccination. The AESI were selected by the Brighton Collaboration as part of their SPEAC (Safety Platform for Emergency vACcines) Project and was funded by CEPI. “Neurological conditions selected included Guillain-Barré syndrome, transverse myelitis, facial (Bell’s) palsy, acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, and convulsions (generalized seizures and febrile seizures) as potential safety signals have been identified for some of these conditions. Hematologic conditions included cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, splanchnic vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism… Thrombocytopenia and immune thrombocytopenia were also included… Myocarditis and pericarditis were included as cardiovascular conditions.” The study found people experienced these various issues at different rates depending on what vaccine they took. For example, AstraZeneca’s clot shot resulted in more cases of Guillain-Barré syndrome and cerebral venous sinus thrombosis (blood clot in the brain), while myocarditis was more closely associated with Pfizer and Moderna’s mRNA Frankenshots. Surprisingly, Magilla Gorilla, who may have been hit on the head by a dumbbell at some point in the recent past, discussed this study with his personal doctor on live TV and allowed her to question the “safe and effective” narrative – which even I must admit is quite commendable. Also see this and this.
Image from linked Daily Mail article.
February 15 – A study is published in the European Heart Journal titled, “Booster vaccination with SARS-CoV-2 mRNA vaccines and myocarditis in adolescents and young adults: a Nordic cohort study.” The study, which analyzed the health outcomes of 8.9 million young adults (ages 12-39) living in Denmark, Finland, Norway and Sweden, showed the COVID clot shots “are associated with an increased risk of myocarditis” in “male adolescents and younger males after the second dose.” The two-sentence conclusion reads, “The results suggest that a booster dose is associated with increased myocarditis risk in adolescents and young adults. However, the absolute risk of myocarditis following booster vaccination is low.”
February 15 – According to a study published at the PNAS website, “COVID-19 vaccine adoption did not significantly change in the weeks before and after states implemented vaccine mandates, suggesting that mandates did not directly impact COVID-19 vaccination… This research supports the notion that governmental restrictions in the form of vaccination mandates can have unintended negative consequences, not necessarily by reducing uptake of the mandated vaccine, but by reducing adoption of other voluntary vaccines.” Also see this.
March 4 – A study is published at PubMed titled, “COVID-19 Rebound After VV116 vs Nirmatrelvir-Ritonavir Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.” The study found VV116 (an oral form of remdesivir) and nirmatrelvir-ritonavir (Paxlovid) to be equally bad in terms of rebound infection up to 28 days after treatment. According to the results, “Viral load rebound occurred in 33 patients (20.0%) in the VV116 group and 39 patients (21.7%) in the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group… Symptom rebound occurred in 41 of 160 patients (25.6%) in the VV116 group and 40 of 163 patients (24.5%) in the nirmatrelvir-ritonavir group… Viral whole-genome sequencing of 24 rebound cases revealed the same lineage at baseline and at viral load rebound in each case.” The study concluded, “In this randomized clinical trial of patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19, viral load rebound and symptom rebound were both common after a standard 5-day course of treatment with either VV116 or nirmatrelvir-ritonavir.” In other words, these drugs are garbage.
March 15 – A preprint study out of Japan is published online titled, “Concerns regarding Transfusions of Blood Products Derived from Genetic Vaccine Recipients and Proposals for Specific Measures.” The authors draw attention to “the various risks associated with blood transfusions using blood products derived from people who have suffered from long COVID and from genetic vaccine recipients, including those who have received mRNA vaccines” and offer ways to address these risks. To their credit, the authors also point out the unprecedented nature of the worldwide COVID vaccination program, and the dangers created by enacting such a program in haste, writing in part, “genetic vaccines are the equivalent of biomedicine (i.e. immune therapeutics) rather than conventional vaccines in terms of their mechanism of action. The various genetic vaccines now treated as vaccines should originally have been treated as biomedicine, but because they were classified as vaccines, huge numbers of people were inoculated with them. As a result, extensive areas of medicine are now beginning to be affected because most of the population in many countries has been vaccinated. This has never happened before in the history of biomedicine, and consequently, it is highly suspected that blood products for transfusion have been affected by these so-called genetic vaccines.”
In the “Overview of Cases of Blood Abnormalities after Genetic Vaccination” section, the authors warn “a PubMed search on diseases such as thrombocytopenia, thrombotic disorders with thrombocytopenia, deep vein thrombosis, thrombocytopenic purpura, cutaneous vasculitis, and sinus thrombosis combined with the essential keywords ‘COVID-19 vaccine’ and ‘side effects’ yielded several hundred articles in only about two years since the rollout of genetic vaccines… In addition to abnormally shaped red blood cells, amorphous material has been found floating in the blood of mRNA-vaccinated individuals under microscopic observation, some of which has shown grossly abnormal findings. Recent studies have also reported that the spike protein has amyloidogenic potential, is neurotoxic, and can cross the blood-brain barrier. Thus, there is no longer any doubt that the spike protein used as an antigen in genetic vaccines is itself toxic… [I]ndividuals who have received multiple doses of a genetic vaccine may have multiple exposures to the same antigen within a brief period, thereby being imprinted with a preferential immune response to that antigen. This phenomenon, called original antigenic sin or immune imprinting, has caused COVID-19 vaccine recipients to become more susceptible to contracting COVID-19. In addition, antibody-dependent enhancement of infection is also known; antibodies produced by vaccination may rather promote viral infection and symptoms. On the other hand, it has also been suggested that repeated administration of genetic vaccines may result in immune tolerance because of a class switch to non-inflammatory immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4), whereby the immune system of the recipient does not mount an excessive response such as cytokine storm, and case reports of IgG4-related disease have begun to appear. This raises concern that alterations in immune function due to immune imprinting and immunoglobulin class switching to IgG4 may also occur in genetic vaccine recipients. This may increase the risk of serious illness due to opportunistic infections or pathogenic viruses that would not normally be a problem if the immune system were normal… It is not actually known how long the vaccine components remain in the body after a person has received a genetic vaccine, but it is expected that they will remain in the body for a longer period than originally thought, in part because spike protein has been detected in the bodies of people several months after vaccination.”
The authors go on to deduce that it is a risky proposition to continue allowing unvaccinated patients to receive the blood of the vaccinated, especially since no mechanism exists to remove the toxic spike protein from donated blood (in section six they discuss the need for such a technology to be developed). They also suggest a more robust record-keeping practice be put in place immediately that would document if and when those donating blood were vaccinated, or if they experienced long COVID after their initial infection. These scientists also believe that as “the residual status of spike protein or modified gene fragments derived from genetic vaccines is currently unknown, it will be necessary in the future to include measurement of these amounts in routine health checkups. It is also necessary to include a section in the routine medical checkup questionnaire to check genetic vaccination status and the number of vaccinations to obtain an overall picture of the residual status of spike proteins in the blood. This is because a variety of conditions following genetic vaccination involve thrombosis and immunological conditions. Therefore, abnormalities in blood components related to these events should also be analyzed. On the other hand, when exosomes collected from vaccine recipients were administered to mice that had not been vaccinated with the genetic vaccine, the spike protein was transmitted. Therefore, it cannot be denied that the spike protein and its modified genes can be transmitted through exosomes. For this reason, we suggest that full testing be done initially, regardless of genetic vaccination status, and that a cohort study be conducted to quickly capture the full picture.”
The authors conclude the study by writing in part, “Finally, we would like to state that if we continue to use genetic vaccines… there will be further risks like those described in this review. It should also be stressed that the issues discussed here are matters that pertain to all organ transplants, including bone marrow transplants, and not just blood products. The impact of these genetic vaccines on blood products and the actual damage caused by them are unknown at present. Therefore, in order to avoid these risks and prevent further expansion of blood contamination and complication of the situation, we strongly request that the vaccination campaign using genetic vaccines be suspended and that a harm-benefit assessment be carried out as early as possible… As we have repeatedly stated, the health injuries caused by genetic vaccination are already extremely serious, and it is high time that countries and relevant organizations take concrete steps together to identify the risks and to control and resolve them.”
Update (4/16/24): During an interview with political commentator Matt Baker on the Alex Jones Show, he shared a story about his wife, who is anemic (the story begins at the 146:10 mark of the linked video). After holding out for a while and refusing a blood transfusion out of fear of having vaccinated blood put into her, the need eventually became too great and she had no choice but to have it done. Immediately after the procedure she felt better, and they thought maybe she got a “softer dose” of spike proteins because they were received via a transfusion and not directly injected into the body in the form of an mRNA jab. As time went on, her anemia progressed and became chronic, and she needed transfusions more regularly. After two or three subsequent transfusions, she developed a bad case of pericarditis, which eventually caused her to be hospitalized for 26 days and fitted with a pericardial drain… and then a second (at this point he holds up a picture of one of the bags the fluid was draining into to show the clots that were coming out of her). Out of the more than ten doctors they interacted with during the course of her stay, two acknowledged that her injury may have, in fact, been caused by receiving spike protein-tainted blood. Baker would later learn about an agency called SafeBlood that – according to their website – is “revolutionizing blood donation by connecting Covid-19 unvaccinated blood donors with those in their own communities who need blood transfusions.” First unvaccinated dating sites and now this? What will the Purebloods think of next?
Graphic taken from the linked study
March 22 – A study is published at medRxiv titled, “Improved diagnosis of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis with cardiac scarring identified by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.” According to the authors, this was the largest such study to date (though still relatively small) with the longest follow-up period as the average time from vaccination to cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) was 18 months. The study found “that the incidence of persistent myocardial fibrosis is high, seen in almost a third of patients at >12 months post diagnosis, which could have implications for the management and prognosis of this predominantly young cohort… [the] findings highlight the critical role played by CMR in the diagnosis and risk-stratification of this condition. Without CMR, almost a third of patients were misclassified as probable rather than definite myocarditis… incidence of LGE [late gadolinium enhancement] was high, seen in 30% of the total cohort. The long-term clinical implications of LGE in this condition are as yet unknown, but LGE has been demonstrated to confer worse prognosis in non-COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis, especially if it persists beyond six months. Furthermore, a study of 222 patients with biopsy-proven myocarditis identified that LGE on CMR was the strongest predictor of long-term mortality… identification of LGE on CMR in patients with a history of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis should at a minimum prompt regular clinical review, to allow for periodic monitoring for arrhythmias and deterioration in cardiac function… Almost a third of patients (28%) who were originally diagnosed with probable myocarditis were found to have persistent LGE on CMR, resulting in reclassification to definite myocarditis. As such, clinical evaluation without CMR may lead to underestimation of long-term risk through failure to identify potentially prognostically significant LGE. We would assert that on the basis of our findings, echocardiographic evaluation alone in a resource-available setting is insufficient in the diagnostic work up of COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis… even longer-term follow up studies are required to define the prognostic significance of LGE in this condition… In conclusion, long-term myocardial fibrosis is a common finding in patients with COVID-19 vaccine-associated myocarditis.”
In response to the study, Dr. Peter McCullough expressed concern about the fact that “47% of this small sample had persistently abnormal MRI scans far more than a year after the initial diagnosis of vaccine damage. These patients may have permanently scarred hearts by COVID-19 vaccination and could have a lifetime of worry about severe outcomes years into the future.” According to McCullough, heart scarring is dangerous “because it puts the patient at risk for two late complications: 1) malignant arrhythmias and cardiac arrest, 2) development of dilated cardiomyopathy and heart failure.”
March 29 – A study is published at JAMA titled, “Reports of COVID-19 Vaccine Adverse Events in Predominantly Republican vs Democratic States.” The study found “that the more states were inclined to vote Republican, the more likely their vaccine recipients or their clinicians reported COVID-19 vaccine AEs [adverse events]. These results suggest that either the perception of vaccine AEs or the motivation to report them was associated with political inclination.” The “discussion” section of the study puts the findings slightly differently, stating “the more states were inclined to vote Republican in the 2020 US presidential election, the more likely their vaccine recipients or clinicians were to report COVID-19 vaccine AEs. This association between political inclination and vaccine AE reporting was not seen for the influenza vaccine. The results are consistent with a relative overreporting of vaccine AEs among Republicans or a relative underreporting among Democrats.” The study ultimately concluded, “The association between observation and belief runs both ways. The adage ‘seeing is believing’ recognizes that our individual experiences inform our sense of truth, and ‘believing is seeing’ recognizes that our preconceptions modulate what we experience in the first place. In finding that Republican-inclined states show higher COVID-19 AE reporting than Democrat-inclined states, this study suggests that Republicans are more likely to perceive or report those AEs and that Democrats are less likely to.” Are these researchers suggesting people should refuse to believe their own lying eyes? While most scientists – and really people in general – would likely have the desire to believe there is an innocent explanation for these disparities, perhaps chalking it up to some type of “perception” problem, or maybe an issue with how these adverse events are being reported, I lean towards a more nefarious reason – an intentional attack based on political affiliation. And since Republicans are being injured and killed at considerably higher rates, I will have to assume the Democrats – the self-declared party of science – are the ones doing the attacking…
Back on April 16th, 2022, I made an entry into the timeline based on adverse reaction data presented by state at howbadismybatch.com. I listed the top 25 states for vaccine injuries and took note of the fact that “almost all of the blue states that are high on the… list experienced a troubling level of election fraud in 2020 and should rightfully be considered red states.” When this information is considered in conjunction with the findings of a Danish study published in March of 2023 (I wrote a breakdown about it on June 28th, 2023), where the “blue batches” accounted for 10% of all COVID vaccine injuries and 50% of COVID vaccine deaths in Denmark, the possibility for intentionality becomes quite real. Do I think it’s possible that red counties in red states are the target of a biological attack that utilizes harmful mRNA “vaccines” as a weapon? You betcha.
State by state adverse event data presented at the How Bad Is My Batch website
Scatter plot contained in the aforementioned Danish study