February 18 – The University of Hamburg publishes a study concluding COVID was likely caused by a leak from the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The study was overseen by Dr. Roland Wiesendanger, a world renowned nanotechnology expert, and it took place over the course of a full year (from Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2020). The study states “both the number and quality of the circumstantial evidence point to a laboratory accident at the virological institute in the city of Wuhan as the cause of the current pandemic” and was based on “scientific literature, articles in print and online media, and personal communication with international colleagues.” The press release states while “It does not provide highly scientific evidence… it does provide ample and serious circumstantial evidence.” The author of the study also said, “This can no longer only be a matter for a small group of scientists, but must urgently become the subject of public debate.” I couldn’t agree more. Among the study’s major findings are: 1) “no intermediate host has been identified that enabled the transmission of SARS-CoV-2 pathogens from bats to humans to date… The zoonosis theory as a possible explanation for the pandemic therefore has no sound scientific basis,” 2) “The SARS-CoV-2 viruses can couple surprisingly well to human cell receptors and penetrate human cells. This is made possible by special cell receptor binding domains connected to a special (furin) cleavage site of the coronavirus spike protein. Both properties together were previously unknown in coronaviruses and indicate a non-natural origin of the SARS-CoV-2 pathogen,” 3) “Bats were not offered at the suspected fish market in central Wuhan City. However, the Wuhan City Virological Institute has one of the world’s largest collections of bat pathogens, which originate from distant caves in southern Chinese provinces. It is extremely unlikely that bats would have made their way naturally to Wuhan from this distance of nearly 2,000 km and then triggered a worldwide pandemic in the immediate vicinity of this virological institute,” 4) “A research group at the virological institute in the city of Wuhan has carried out genetic manipulations on coronaviruses for many years with the aim of making them more contagious, dangerous and deadly for humans. This is proven by numerous publications in the scientific specialist literature,” and 5) “There were significant safety deficiencies in the virological institute in the city of Wuhan even before the outbreak of the coronavirus pandemic, which are documented.” Evidence for all of these conclusions is contained at this website.
February 19 – National Panhandler Radio publishes an article titled “Long-Term Studies Of COVID-19 Vaccines Hurt By Placebo Recipients Getting Immunized” that reveals serious flaws in Moderna’s COVID-19 vaccine studies. The author explains how a doctor running a study to test the efficacy and long term effects of the Moderna shot at a location in Kansas called back all of the 650 participants after the shot was given an emergency use authorization and offered it to those in the control group (who had been given a placebo). All but two people took the shot. If the ultimate decision about whether these “vaccines” will be given full authorization is based on studies like this, how could any useful information be gathered without a control group? The doctor running the study even acknowledges this with the article quoting him as saying, “It’s a loss from a scientific standpoint, but given the circumstances I think it’s the right thing to do.” Even more startling is how it was Moderna that decided to offer the injection to the control group in their own study. The article states, “People signing up for these studies were not promised special treatment, but once the FDA authorized the vaccines, their developers decided to offer the shots.” This is insane.
March 2 – A white paper is released by FAIR Health titled, “The Impact of COVID-19 on Pediatric Mental Health: A Study of Private Health Care Claims.” Using their access to over 32 billion health care claims, the group compared the claims between January and November 2020 to claims during the same months in 2019 – and the findings were nothing short of disturbing. The summary begins by stating, “The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on mental health, particularly on that of young people,” before going over some of their “key findings.” These findings include: 1) mental health claims doubled for kids between 13 and 18 years of age, 2) “Claim lines for intentional self-harm as a percentage of all medical claim lines in the 13-18 age group increased 90.71 percent in March 2020 compared to March 2019. The increase was even larger when comparing April 2020 to April 2019, nearly doubling (99.83 percent),” 3) When “Comparing August 2019 to August 2020 in the Northeast, for the age group 13-18, there was a 333.93 percent increase in intentional self-harm claim lines as a percentage of all medical claim lines,” 4) “For the age group 13-18, claim lines for overdoses increased 94.91 percent as a percentage of all medical claim lines in March 2020 and 119.31 percent in April 2020 over the same months the year before,” 5) “For the age group 13-18, in April 2020, claim lines for generalized anxiety disorder increased 93.6 percent as a percentage of all medical claim lines over April 2019, while major depressive disorder claim lines increased 83.9 percent and adjustment disorder claim lines 89.7 percent.” What makes these startling statistics even worse is that we’ve known from very early on that children are not very susceptible to the coronavirus, and spread from children to older family members was virtually nonexistent. As I’ve been writing for months, these harmful lockdown policies need to end, and they need to end now.
April 7 – NIAID begins a clinical trial to “estimate the proportion of systemic allergic reactions to the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and the Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine in a High-Allergy/Mast Cell Disorder (HA/MCD) population” and to see “If the risk in the HA/MCD is demonstrable, to determine whether the proportions are higher in the HA/MCD compared to a non-atopic population.” The study description reads in part: “Allergic reactions have been reported to occur after vaccination with both the Pfizer-BioNTech COVID-19 Vaccine and Moderna COVID-19 Vaccine. Allergic reactions range from mild to severe and include life-threatening anaphylactic reactions, although no deaths have been reported with either vaccine.” This claim is interesting (and by “interesting” I mean bullshit) because according to the CDC there have been over 2,000 deaths in the US attributed to these experimental shots (through March 19th), and another 4,000 deaths in the European Union (through March 13), according to their EudraVigilance database. As of today, 64.4M people in the US are “fully vaccinated” and another 45M people have had at least one dose of the “vaccine.” I don’t see the number of people taking these shots getting too much higher, but I could be wrong. The forces of propaganda are strong.
May 8 – The Science Times publishes an article titled, “Ivermectin COVID Studies Suggests Anti-Parasitic Drug Is the Cure to Coronavirus, Possibly Ending Pandemic.” The piece goes on to discuss a study conducted by a group of scientists who are part of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care (FLCCC). It found “statistically significant reduction in recovery time, viral clearance, and even mortality rates in cases that used ivermectin.” Ivermectin has been known to be an effective treatment for COVID since December 2020 when Dr. Pierre Kory, one of the founders of FLCCC, testified to congress about its effectiveness in treating COVID. It’s nice of the folks at the Science Times to get around to covering it, though I guess late is better than never.
May 19 – Bloomberg reports on a French study in which dogs showed the ability to sniff out positive COVID patients well over 90% of the time. Sweat was swabbed from the armpits of 335 people, 109 of which were COVID positive, and the samples were placed in jars for the dogs to sniff. Nine dogs participated in the study, accurately detecting COVID in 97% of the samples. Action is being taken across Europe to adequately train dogs to detect the disease so they can be deployed at various venues such as airports. Beats the hell out of an anal swab… Also see this.
May 24 – Researchers at the Washington School of Medicine in St. Louis, Missouri publish a study revealing those who have recovered from a mild case of COVID now have long lasting immunity – perhaps even lifelong immunity. “During a viral infection, antibody-producing immune cells rapidly multiply and circulate in the blood, driving antibody levels sky-high. Once the infection is resolved, most such cells die off, and blood antibody levels drop. A small population of antibody-producing cells, called long-lived plasma cells, migrate to the bone marrow and settle in, where they continually secrete low levels of antibodies into the bloodstream to help guard against another encounter with the virus.” See this news release for a good overview of the study’s findings.
May 27 – Contained at the c19hcq.com website is a database of all the hydroxychloroquine studies that have been done around the world. A meta analysis was just published there and the findings might surprise you. The analysis shows that 100% of the 29 early treatment studies showed HCQ had a positive effect on patients and 13 mortality rate studies showed a 75% reduction in mortality. There was also “substantial evidence of bias towards publishing negative results. 85% of prospective studies report positive effects, and only 72% of retrospective studies do. Studies from North America are 3.4 times more likely to report negative results than studies from the rest of the world combined… Negative meta analyses of HCQ generally choose a subset of trials, focusing on late treatment, especially trials with very late treatment and excessive dosages.” In other words, the effectiveness of HCQ was actively suppressed by the WHO, the CDC, the NIH, the FDA and people like Dr. Fauci (also see this) through a massive media propaganda campaign. As I have continuously stated throughout this timeline, many of the decisions that were made, as well as many of the actions taken by the government and the scientific community at all levels were politically driven. They had nothing to do with science or the promotion of public health. In fact, the opposite is true. Instead of making extremely cheap, effective and widely available drugs like HCQ and ivermectin available for use as both a therapeutic and a prophylactic, their use was demonized and even blocked as a treatment for COVID in states with particularly ghoulish governors. Meanwhile, people like Dr. Fauci were out promoting far less effective drugs like Remdesivir that cost patients or their insurance companies thousands of dollars to obtain. This enormous scam was meant to worsen the crisis, sow fear into millions of mindless people who mistake blatant propaganda for actual news, reap massive profits through testing and treatment (and eventually vaccines) and set the stage for globalist run multinational corporations to take over society by literally destroying their competition via government decree. During the entirety of the pandemic I have been documenting this orgy of evil and corruption and it’s astounding. The only way to prevent this from ever happening again is to harshly punish those responsible for perpetuating these crimes against humanity.
May 27 – BMJ Global Health Initiative publishes the results of a Norwegian study that found “The Pfizer-BioNTech covid-19 vaccine is ‘likely’ to have been responsible for at least 10 deaths of frail elderly people in nursing homes in Norway.” The expert review was commissioned by the Norwegian Medicines Agency “at the end of February 2021 to look into the cause of the first 100 reported deaths of nursing home residents who had received the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine… The review reported on 19 May and concluded that a causal link between the Pfizer-BioNTech vaccine and death was considered ‘likely’ in 10 of the 100 cases, ‘possible’ in 26 cases, and ‘unlikely’ in 59 cases. The remaining five were deemed ‘unclassifiable.’” The authors also questioned whether “extremely frail” patients benefit at all from being vaccinated because they are running the risk of having their death brought about sooner than it otherwise would have. As of 5/18/21 there have been 155 deaths in Norway attributed to the Pfizer COVID “vaccine.”
June 1 – Israel’s Health Ministry announces the findings of a study revealing a “probable link between receiving the second dose (of Pfizer) vaccine and the appearance of myocarditis among men aged 16 to 30.” Several hundred cases have been reported in the country to date, though millions have received the shot. 95% of the cases were classified as mild, according to Reuters. So far around 55% of the Israeli population has taken the jab, though approval to make the shot available to 12-15 year olds may come as soon as next week. The article also notes that during “a May 24 meeting, the CDC advisory group said that the data from the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) – which relies on doctors and individuals to report results – showed a higher than expected number of observed myocarditis or pericarditis cases in 16 to 24-year-olds.”
June 3 – A new study out of Munich University in Germany shows the country’s lockdown policies “had no effect” on the trajectory of the COVID pandemic, while also finding “no direct connection” between lockdowns and falling rates of infection. The linked article also mentions the study “found clear evidence the rate was already falling on the two occasions the lockdown was tightened, in December and April.” I’d bet they would all still do it again if they could though.
June 5 – Scientists at the Cleveland Clinic publish the results of a study at the medRxiv website that found “Individuals who have had SARS-CoV-2 infection are unlikely to benefit from COVID-19 vaccination…” The author of this article also noted that “no significant difference in COVID-19 incidence was observed between previously infected and currently unvaccinated participants, previously infected and currently vaccinated participants, and previously uninfected and currently vaccinated participants… Importantly, not a single incidence of SARS-CoV-2 infection was observed in previously infected participants with or without vaccination.”
June 6 – The findings of yet another study showing the COVID was man made are revealed in a Wall Street Jingo opinion piece by Dr. Stephen Quay and Berkeley physics professor Richard Muller. The scientists state “COVID-19 has a genetic footprint that has never been observed in a natural coronavirus.” The genetic footprint they are referring to is the CGG-CGG genome sequence, which does not occur naturally and is commonly used by gain of function researchers. “The CGG-CGG combination has never been found naturally. That means the common method of viruses picking up new skills, called recombination, cannot operate here. A virus simply cannot pick up a sequence from another virus if that sequence isn’t present in any other virus… At the minimum, this fact – that the coronavirus, with all its random possibilities, took the rare and unnatural combination used by human researchers – implies that the leading theory for the origin of the coronavirus must be laboratory escape.” Also see this.
June 8 – The results of a meta-analysis are published to determine the fatality rate of the coronavirus. Data from 23 different studies was used, each of which had at least 500 participants and was peer reviewed. The analysis determined the overall fatality rate to be 0.26%, with the fatality rate for cases in patients <70 years of age being 0.04%. In other words, the recovery rate is 99.74%. The hysterical frenzy to “vaccinate” every last person on Earth is clearly not based on “science,” even though that is what we’re constantly told. This is pure lunacy.
June 17 – The New England Journal of Medicine publishes a study revealing an 82% rate of “spontaneous abortions” in women who received COVID jabs in either the first or second trimester of their pregnancy. The study’s authors, however, dishonestly present misleading figures in an attempt to make the “vaccine” appear safer than it actually is. By using the total number of women who participated in the study (827) as the denominator, and the total number of spontaneous abortions that occurred (104) as the numerator, they are able to conclude that 12.6% of the pregnancies ended abruptly after the mother took the “vaccine” – which is horrible in and of itself. The 700 who women received the jab in their third trimester could not technically have a spontaneous abortion because they were already past the 20 week threshold. When you remove them from the equation and use 104 as the numerator (number of spontaneous abortions) and 127 as the denominator (number of women in their first or second trimester) you get a rate of 82%, which is quite alarming. Disturbingly, though not surprisingly, the “fact checkers” are out to debunk this “claim” (also see this)… That’s because they know most people won’t look through any of the data for themselves.
June 25 – Public Health England publishes a report revealing vaccinated individuals are three times more likely to die from the “Delta” variant than those who are unvaccinated. The tables on pages 13 and 14 show that out of the over 81,000 study participants, 70 of the 27,192 vaccinated participants died – a death rate of 0.26% – while 44 of the 53,822 unvaccinated participants died, a death rate of 0.08%. Meanwhile, China Joe is using the Delta variant to fear monger more Americans into getting the “vaccine.” None of this has ever been about health, safety or “science.”
June 28 – A study is published by doctors from the University of Almeria in Spain showing there are toxic nanoparticles of graphene oxide in the Pfizer COVID vaccine. While the researchers found there was some mRNA material contained in the vial, most of what the serum consisted of was graphene oxide. Various outlets are of course attacking the findings… and pretty shoddily I might add. I could only find a link to the study on DocDroid, which was constantly prompting me to download it. Therefore, I recommend watching this short breakdown video instead, which is very informative.
June 30 – A study is published in the Journal of the American Medical Association which found school children forced to wear masks breathed in an average of six times the level of carbon dioxide considered safe. From Lockdown Skeptics: “The peer-reviewed research letter from Dr Harald Walach and colleagues found that the air masked children inhaled contained more than six times the legal safe limit for closed rooms as set down by the German Federal Environmental Office. The safe limit is 0.2%, whereas the air the masked children inhaled contained over 1.3% carbon dioxide. The effect was worse for younger children, with one seven-year-old child inhaling air with 2.5% carbon dioxide. Over 12 times the safe limit. The study looked at two types of masks, FFP2 masks and surgical masks, and found no significant difference between the two. The authors explained that this alarming result likely explains the complaints from children who wear face masks for long periods.”
July 7 – A study published at Research Square found just 25 under-18s died from COVID out of 469,982 such cases in Britain during the first 12 months of the pandemic. This means for children under 18 COVID has a 99.995% survival rate. During the same period researchers found 124 children died from suicide and 268 died from trauma. For kids, the response to COVID has been much more damaging than the disease itself.
July 9 – A new Politico-Harvard study (also see this) finds a majority of Americans (52%) now believe COVID was created in a lab. Out of those polled, 59% of Republicans, 52% of Democrats and 47% of Independents felt the disease had a lab origin, with 62% believing it is “extremely or very important” for the US to discover the origin of the Wuhan Red Death.
July 23 – A study from Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh reveals those with the highest levels of education tend to be the most vaccine hesitant. This flies in the face of the mainstream media narrative about how those who don’t want the unproven COVID jab are ignorant victims of “disinformation.”
July 28 – A study is published titled “Six Month Safety and Efficacy of the BNT162b2 mRNA COVID-19 Vaccine.” The purpose of the study was to determine the safety and efficacy of Pfizer’s COVID jab. In the adverse events section of the report, the text reads, “During the blinded, controlled period, 15 BNT162b2 and 14 placebo recipients died; during the open-label period, 3 BNT162b2 and 2 original placebo recipients who received BNT162b2 after unblinding died. None of these deaths were considered related to BNT162b2 by investigators. Causes of death were balanced between BNT162b2 and placebo groups.” So where’s the supposed benefit I keep hearing about? The study shows the shot did nothing to protect the recipients as the same number of people died from both groups.
July 30 – The CDC publishes a study analyzing a COVID outbreak that occurred in Barnstable County, Maskachussetts. Of the 469 reported cases, 74% (346) were among people that have been “fully vaccinated,” and 79% (274) of them were symptomatic. Out of the 5 people that needed to be hospitalized, 4 were “fully vaccinated.” Despite the facts, the CDC and the Biden administration continue their full court press to get every last person in America to take this obviously ineffective “vaccine.” Unfortunately for us, their campaign has absolutely nothing to do with people’s health and its goals are purely nefarious.
August 6 – Jon Rappoport publishes an article explaining how a Pfizer/BioNTech study from November of 2020 showed the company knew injecting people with spike proteins would cause vaccine shedding from person to person. To make matters worse, they felt this was dangerous and that exposure to the vaccinated needed to be reported immediately to the company’s safety personnel. The study makes numerous references to pregnant women and infers children could be harmed.
August 25 – A study out of Israel is published which concludes, “…natural immunity confers longer lasting and stronger protection against infection, symptomatic disease and hospitalization caused by the Delta variant of SARS-CoV-2, compared to the BNT162b2 two-dose vaccine-induced immunity.” The study also showed “vaccinees had a 13.06-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection with the Delta variant compared to those previously infected, when the first event (infection or vaccination) occurred during January and February of 2021. The increased risk was significant for symptomatic disease as well. When allowing the infection to occur at any time before vaccination (from March 2020 to February 2021), evidence of waning natural immunity was demonstrated, though SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees had a 5.96-fold increased risk for breakthrough infection and a 7.13-fold increased risk for symptomatic disease. SARS-CoV-2 naïve vaccinees were also at a greater risk for COVID-19-related-hospitalizations compared to those that were previously infected.” Avoid the clot shot at all costs.
September 16 – As if 2021 wasn’t creepy enough already, UC Riverside announces they will be receiving a $500K grant from the National Science Foundation to study whether mRNA can be injected into edible plants – and if it will replicate. The goal is to be able to produce mRNA “vaccines” that can be grown and stored at much higher temperatures than the current “vaccines.” Now would be an excellent time to start learning about gardening and purchasing storable non-GMO seeds if you haven’t done that already.
September 30 – A study is published in Viruses stating, “our data indicates that – compared with mRNA vaccination – natural infection induces a more robust humoral immune response in unexposed subjects.” How much longer can natural immunity be ignored?
October 27 – A study is published at The Lancet showing “Treatment with fluvoxamine (100mg twice daily for 10 days) among high-risk outpatients with early diagnosed COVID-19 reduced the need for hospitalisation [sic] defined as retention in a COVID-19 emergency setting or transfer to a tertiary hospital.” The study also showed fluvoxamine reduced hospitalizations by 5% and reduced mortality by a third. Consider it another tool in the tool box.
October 29 – The New England Journal of Medicine publishes a study showing immunity gained from the “vaccines” wanes after just a few months in all age groups.
November 1 – A study published by the Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota finds people who have received the Johnson & Johnson COVID “vaccine” are 3.5 times more likely to develop cerebral venous sinus thrombosis, a rare and deadly condition that causes blood clots in the brain. The average rate for this condition in the general population is 2.34 per 100K, but after taking the clot shot the risk rises to 8.65 per 100K. Women – excuse me, bodies with vaginas – are even more at risk as their rate rises to 13.01 per 100K on average. Even more startling are the rates for women between the ages of 30-39 (26.50 per 100K) and 40-49 (29.50 per 100K). The researchers used data from the VAERS reporting system to draw these conclusions, which was estimated in a 2010 Harvard study to be underreported by a factor of 100. In other words, injuries and deaths related to vaccines are only reported 1-10% of the time figuring conservatively.
November 4 – A new study shows a dramatic decline in the effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccines over time. The researchers poured through the records of over 780K veterans to look at breakthrough cases and death records from February 1 to October 1, 2021. They found that between March and September of 2021 the effectiveness of the Moderna jab dropped from 89% to 58%, Pfizer’s dropped from 87% to 45% and Johnson and Johnson’s dropped from 86% to just 13%. Also see this.
November 24 – Researchers publish a concerning paper in the New England Journal of Medicine theorizing about how the high level of spike protein antibodies created by vaccination could be what’s causing heart problems and may lead to neurological issues in the future. Though the cure may be worse than the disease in the long run, this won’t make headlines or slow the push to inject children. Alex Berenson wrote an easy to understand article about the study which you can read here.
December 7 – The World Inequality Database reveals what many already knew – the pandemic made the rich richer while the poor were made even poorer. According to the study cited, the top 10% of the world’s wealthiest took in 52% of the world’s income in 2021 and own a staggering 76% of the world’s wealth. The bottom 50%, on the other hand, took in only 8% of the world’s income in 2021 and own only 2% of the world’s wealth.
December 16 – The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) publishes a study in Eurosurveillance after being tasked with investigating a COVID outbreak following a Christmas party on November 26th. One of the attendees had returned from South Africa just a couple of days earlier. The study found that “Most of the cases (n = 79; 98%) and non-cases (n = 27; 93%) were fully vaccinated.” The study goes on to state, “Our preliminary investigation of the first outbreak in Norway with the Omicron VOC supports the notion that this SARS-CoV-2 variant is highly transmissible even among fully vaccinated people… Previous outbreaks caused by the SARS-CoV-2 Delta variant have also been reported in Norway among highly vaccinated populations.” The study’s conclusion states, “The preliminary results of our outbreak investigation indicate that the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron VOC is highly transmissible among fully vaccinated young and middle-aged adults. However, given the specific context of the outbreak in a high-risk setting for transmission, the findings must be interpreted with caution.” Ya gotta love the token “interpret the findings with caution” line. Since medical journals have become vehicles for getting the latest Big Pharma products fast-tracked and approved by governments, this line was added for their benefit.
December 22 – A new study shows how after 90 days, protection by the Pfizer and Moderna “vaccines” against the Omicron variant actually goes negative. This means that people who took the Moderna jab are 39.3% more likely to get infected than the unvaxxed, while people who took the Pfizer jab are 76.5% more likely to be infected than the unvaxxed. This means that people are going to need boosters constantly because their immune systems are gone. I know this because the last line of the study reads, “In light of the exponential rise in Omicron cases, these findings highlight the need for massive rollout of vaccinations and booster vaccinations.” This is just unreal. Hat tip to Ezra Levant.